Team-BHP - View Single Post

ImmortalZ · 26th January 2009, 11:30

X75 is worse. 5% more visibility, but a lot less heat rejection. I believe it is cheaper too.

I used VK-70 for the sides as well. Ran me 36K for the whole job. There's a Diamond series film which you can use for the sides. It is darker, but has even better heat rejection. Cost difference is minimal. 1500 bucks more for it I think.

I didn't want dark sunfilm, which is why I went with 70 all over.

P.S : Prices are for my car. Civic has a lot of window area, so it gets mighty expensive.

26th January 2009, 11:30	#633 (permalink)
ImmortalZ Senior - BHPian Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Trivandrum Posts: 1,724	X75 is worse. 5% more visibility, but a lot less heat rejection. I believe it is cheaper too. I used VK-70 for the sides as well. Ran me 36K for the whole job. There's a Diamond series film which you can use for the sides. It is darker, but has even better heat rejection. Cost difference is minimal. 1500 bucks more for it I think. I didn't want dark sunfilm, which is why I went with 70 all over. P.S : Prices are for my car. Civic has a lot of window area, so it gets mighty expensive. __________________ Honda - Providing the least Kilo per Lakh since 1948. Last edited by ImmortalZ : 26th January 2009 at 11:31.