View Single Post
Old 22nd May 2007, 09:48   #226 (permalink)
rdkarthik
BHPian
 
rdkarthik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: bangalore
Posts: 185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by veyron1 View Post
Ok. Here goes. Speed/density metering or mapping is usually dependent on engine speed, air density and MAP.

Alpha-n is the advanced version for mapping which can take in more radical cam profiles because it reads from the engine RPM and throttle body positioning only, bypassing the MAP.
Alpha-N is not an advanced version for mapping. Its just an alternative. It works great on wild cam profiles because these cams produce a lot of pressure fluctuations in the intake manifold when they are working at RPMs other than designed for, confusing the speed-density system.

Quote:

Now, both systems/routings are prone to vacuum errors/stats.
What errors are you talking about? Is it computed quantity of air in the system?

Alpha-N does not depend on vacuum anyway...

Quote:
The Escorts had TBIs. How exactly did the alpha-n system "improve" the combustion characterisitics? AFAIK, MPFI's have much more precise fuel metering, correct?
right.. MPFIs are far better than TBI for precision and metering.. MPFIs can be Alpha-N too.

wrt escorts, when compared to a carb system, alpha-N TBI is definetly an improvement, but not wrt mpfi and/or speed-speed density ssytem for a stock car.

Quote:


Ok. Now for details. Let's have in detail the effects on cam profiles for alpha-n (since that's what's used for racing applications- we know that poppet and stem height are in direct relation to lift; so we'll go into that later),and ignition timing (both ignitor mapping and delco alteration-for the Escort). And how exactly do both of them alter IPW at WOT (assuming WOT is at 100%, both systems are giving 100% fuel flow)....
i thought the escort had a distributorless setup...


Quote:

Simply put, let's have in detail the differences in ACTUAL practical applications, and how-to's...
1. With Alpha-N its very difficult to pass emission standards, even at OEM levels - E2,E3,E4,etc, as compared to speed-density or maf. Thats why we dont see them on street cars (execpt in limp home mode with a screwed map sensor system)

2. Alpha-N is prefered (actually a must) for individual throttle body and/or wild cam profile applications.

3. MAP or MAF is a must for turbo/supercharger applications

waiting for the guys to chip in.......

Last edited by rdkarthik : 22nd May 2007 at 09:49.
rdkarthik is offline   Reply With Quote