View Single Post
Old 26th July 2007, 14:55   #741 (permalink)
extreme_torque
Senior - BHPian
 
extreme_torque's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delhi
Posts: 1,325
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kkr2k2 View Post
you mean you are not a lord yet

Thanks a ton e_t, that was very informative.
From the information you have given, I will use the raw-format when I want to try some photography and want to capture some fine details. But for the rest of the times will use '' in-camera processing ''. For the time being, i will leave the proceesing thing to the camera for capturing those ''memorable'' shots, as I am yet to learn the photography and photshop tools.

raj.
Far far from it infact

The noise reduction was just an example, RAW basically gives you all the freedom to do the processing after you have clicked the pic. Its the "original" image.
I remember reading a review of some pentax cam where they specifically mentioned that the processed pics straight out of the camera arent good, while the RAW images came out awesome, in this case you can click the pic in RAW and since the in camera processing isnt good, you can process it afterwards to your satisfaction. Canon cam's have very good in camera processing, so good at times that getting the same results with a processed RAW image becomes very difficult.
extreme_torque is offline   Reply With Quote