View Single Post
Old 9th September 2007, 18:49   #69 (permalink)
-GS-
BHPian
 
-GS-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Delhi
Posts: 348
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by speedy View Post
on paper even from the company it states 52 for the caddy. i agree there are minor cosmetic changes that cannot be very easily made out. i have papers of the company as well cause the maharaja wanted it that way. the identity does not change in any ways.
to clear the doubt the next time you are free i shall call the owner and we can inspect it more closely. i knew i should have looked for the plates and taken pictures of it. alot of issues would have been settled.
So you have the papers of the company that states its a 52 caddy but with some minor cosmetic parts of a 51 caddy. Even if you didn't have the papers, people would have been able to recognize it. But here we are just not able to recognize it because the model 680 K is no where to be found and it doesn't look like a 680 S.

Lets not discuss the Caddy here as it would make the reading confusing.
__________________
Ability is nothing without opportunity - Napoleon Bonaparte
-GS- is offline   Reply With Quote