Quote:
Originally Posted by reignofchaos  Heheheh I knew someone or the other would bring up the NAD C272/C372. Frankly speaking, the NADs are kinda sad amps. Having heard the C272/C162 combo and lived with a C320 for more than a year and having moved to better quality stuff, all I can say are that the NADs are uninvolving, boring and have the typical British house sound.
Its not something I'd call HiFi. There's a reason why this thing costs 60-70k. The design has a hell lotta compromises. Push-Pull, global negative feedback to keep distortion down and all of the standard tricks of the trade. Anything better than that costs a lot more money. |
Ok then tell us which amp is according to you a good amp. As you have said Nad as sad and other high class Car audio amp as boom box
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bass&Trouble Lol, what on earth is a "car boom box amp"? |
Ya new term for me also. But I do not find any driver (speaker) in a amp which will complete the boom box.