View Single Post
Old 5th April 2008, 21:22   #7 (permalink)
clipto333
BHPian
 
clipto333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: jalandhar
Posts: 912
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shrivz View Post
The GTO 75.4 was a great amplifier with respect to the power it put out at its price!

The GTO1004 has a slightly better Signal to noise ratio: 85dbA (reference 1W into 4 ohms) compared to 80dbA (reference 1W into 4 ohms) of the 75.4, hence sound quality would be better, but at the cost of power. It would be a good bet to run 4 speakers off it. It wouldn't do justice to a subwoofer as the 75.4 did!

The GTO 75.4 would be a better bet for running a DVC sub in bridged mode. (it is by far one of the best amps to run a sub with that kind power at that price!)
Hi,

The difference in power is really negligible but from what i know, the 1004 is much better sq wise. The 75.4 no doubt is a great amplifier. But, it was a little harsh. For sub duty though, nothing can beat this amp. It has loads of power. I think the 1004 wont be far off. There wont be a great difference in sub output. 225 watts are not at all bad.

I think, the 1004 will be equally good if not better and Imo, it looks good too. But at 15k for the 1004, the 75.4 makes more sense to me.

cheers
clipto333 is offline   Reply With Quote