| |||||||
| Register | BHP Garage | Classifieds | Team-BHP FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| View Poll Results: Which offers better performance? | |||
| K&N | | 25 | 56.82% |
| Ractive | | 19 | 43.18% |
| Voters: 44. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| BHPian Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: cochin
Posts: 167
| I had been searching the entire forum for a comparison between k&n and ractive air filters.Found none..so decided to start a thread on it..Actualy i am planning to fit one for my palio..iam in a dilemmaa to choose what.. Heard that, k&n ::>> most popular and reliable 10 miles guarantee. Guarnteed improvement in performance most commonly used long lasting costly(4500 for universal) ractive::>>not so popular very cost effective(2000 bucks(approx) for conical) Same performance as k&n. no one has made a comparison between the too. few questions:- 1)is k&n worth that money? 2)is ractive less costly because of the cheap materials used to make it or is it because it is less popular? 3)is ractive as reliable as k&n? 4)regarding the performance gain which is good? ractive or k&n?
__________________ 2004 MODDED ZEN |--| FIAT PALIO 1.6 GTX|--| 2002 BOLERO |--| 2006 LANCER |--| 2001 OMNI |--| 97 M 800 |--| 2004 HONDA UNICORN Last edited by HAFI : 22nd March 2007 at 12:10. |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| BHPian | I think a lot of people here use ractive and are very happy. I would say the availability and brand name is the only major difference between k&N and Ractive. There are some Bhpians who have used both the brands (like viper) . It would be helpful if they share their views on both the brands
__________________ Boyz will remain Boyz.......Only their Toyz change |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| BHPian | I believe comparing the two would not be a good idea - that would potentially lead this thread to go all over the place on whether K&N is actually good or not - we have seen the same on countless other threads. Perhaps we can discuss the merits of Ractive seperately. Just my 2 cents. Regards. p.s. - I am a satisfied Ractive user.
__________________ Ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Senior - BHPian Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Currently at Chennai. Originally from Blore.
Posts: 1,674
| Its actually 10 years or one Million miles guarantee, whichever is earlier. ![]() BTW i have an OE K&N which i am satisfied with. Of course the brand name does instill a sense of reliability and peace of mind. For brands which are less popular, people are generally skeptical.
__________________ RIP Tootie !!! Missing you terribly. Last edited by n_aditya : 22nd March 2007 at 13:21. |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) | |
| Senior - BHPian Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Currently at Chennai. Originally from Blore.
Posts: 1,674
| Quote:
![]()
__________________ RIP Tootie !!! Missing you terribly. | |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Senior - BHPian Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Chennai
Posts: 1,312
| Iam a happy customer of Ractive. Gives wonderful performance at minimal spending comparatively. Since I have not tried out k&n, could not comment on that. As mentioned by rishibravo, Bhp'ians who had tested with both the brands could let everyone know if there is any markable difference betweeen these two |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) | |
| BHPian | Quote:
I would know the difference between running 4 km/day in a pair of Reeboks and an Action and/or Chinese-made shoe - would end up having stress fractures with the latter.Last edited by johy : 22nd March 2007 at 13:56. | |
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| BHPian | What if someone told you that the Reebok you are so gung ho about is made in the same factory in China that manufactures similar non-branded sneakers at 1/5th the price.
__________________ Ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| BHPian | K&N is a supreme brand. I myself bought Ractive after pondering over both brands for quite some time. reason - VFM. Yet to use it and see. There will be difference between brands. But i don't think the difference will be huge. Or is it? Not sure. Praying that my ractive will not disappoint me. can we put a poll and see how many use these brands and how satisfied they are? I think there are enough Ractive users on t-bhp atleast. Last edited by kutlee : 22nd March 2007 at 15:13. Reason: poll ! |
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| Senior - BHPian | The international prices of K&N and Ractive and Pipercross ,etc... dont differ much for a similar model. I would just have to repeat RTech's words here. Not to forget, K&N is wet type(oil) and Ractive is dry type(no oil).Pipercross is foam-based. I know of one bike tuner who travels to the South-east and purchases K&N filters at the international pricing(meant half the indian price) and sells it to customers at the Indian price.
__________________ hindu.com/mp/2008/08/25/stories/2008082522220200.htm |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RACTIVE SF400 Foam Air Filter | eagle_f1 | Shifting gears | 5 | 29th October 2007 20:39 |
| ractive or k&n? | NIKHILallug | Modifications & Accessories | 5 | 9th May 2007 19:10 |
| Wish GTO & GTO's Girl A Lifetime of Love & Togetherness! | Steeroid | Shifting gears | 118 | 20th July 2006 05:19 |
All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 06:16.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446








I would know the difference between running 4 km/day in a pair of Reeboks and an Action and/or Chinese-made shoe - would end up having stress fractures with the latter.
