Go Back   Team-BHP > Under the Hood > In-Car Entertainment > Ask the Gurus

Ask the Gurus Post your ICE questions here


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 14th September 2007, 10:55   #16 (permalink)
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Sam Kapasi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bombay (but watch this space)
Posts: 7,211
Default

It isn't called a pre-amped tube, it's called a powered bass tube. That model has been pulled out for various reasons. As of now JBL has no powered bass tubes or boxes.

That tube you have posted is very popular. You will need an amplifier to drive it, but it should be fun and good VFM.
__________________
Live the YetiLife®
Sam Kapasi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2007, 11:22   #17 (permalink)
Newbie
 
firingonallfour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 44
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Kapasi View Post
It isn't called a pre-amped tube, it's called a powered bass tube. That model has been pulled out for various reasons. As of now JBL has no powered bass tubes or boxes.

That tube you have posted is very popular. You will need an amplifier to drive it, but it should be fun and good VFM.
Hi Sam

I looked hard for the preamped base tube but I couldnt find it. I think a regular Bass tube is the way to go. Any idea what VFM amplifier I should mate this with ? a 2 channel or 4 channel or is there a specific amp for subs /tubes

Any shop in mumbai that is confirmed to keep orginals ? There are two mentioned in the thread I am planning to approach

Thank you
__________________
__________________________________________
If you don't like the way I drive, stay off the sidewalk!

Last edited by firingonallfour : 14th September 2007 at 11:41. Reason: Addition
firingonallfour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2007, 12:44   #18 (permalink)
Senior - BHPian
 
panky12345's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 1,589
Infractions: 0/1 (4)
Default

Yup, you can go in for 2 options:

1. 4 channel for speakers (75.4/CS60.4) + mono (301.1) for tube

2. 4 channel for speakers ( 75.4/CS60.4)+ 2 channel bridged (CS60.2)for tube
__________________
SINGH IS KINNNNNNNG..
panky12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2007, 21:49   #19 (permalink)
BHPian
 
beanstalk_230's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lucknow/New Delhi
Posts: 196
Default

would cs 60.4 with the sub produce better sound (only the connected to sub and no comp) or a single cs 60.2 connected to the sub produce better sound ??
beanstalk_230 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2007, 23:05   #20 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Noida
Posts: 163
Default

Personally, I don't like the CS series from jbl. However, if you have to choose an amp only for the sub I would say go for the cs60.2 as it is a two channel amplifier so will work out cheaper for you.
Why don't you go in for a mono amplifier if you are going to use it only for the sub ?
akg7091 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2007, 00:00   #21 (permalink)
Senior - BHPian
 
rocksterraghu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 1,110
Default

Quote:
would cs 60.4 with the sub produce better sound (only the connected to sub and no comp) or a single cs 60.2 connected to the sub produce better sound ??
IMO, both would perform the same, unless it is a DVC.
__________________
...
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler
rocksterraghu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2007, 12:13   #22 (permalink)
Senior - BHPian
 
panky12345's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 1,589
Infractions: 0/1 (4)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by beanstalk_230 View Post
would cs 60.4 with the sub produce better sound (only the connected to sub and no comp) or a single cs 60.2 connected to the sub produce better sound ??
Relax! Here are some facts:

60.4 is a 4 channel Amp that pumps out app 160 W X 2 in bridged mode @ 4 ohms.

60.2 is a 2 channel amp that pumps app 160 W X 1 in bridged mode @ 4 ohms. (even though fxaudio says its 2 X 160W )

None of the above is 2 ohm stable in bridged mode.

1. Now, if you connect 1 sub SVC (eg Pio 306/307 C) to 60.2 in bridged mode, it would be fine. Alternatively, you can connect 1 2 ohm DVC sub in series to 60.2 to present a 4 ohm load. Total power to the sub in each case would be app 160 W.

2. If you use 60.4 and connect is just to 1 sub, you can safely go in for 1 Sub DVC 4 ohm (eg Pio 306/307 DVC) and power each coil with 2 bridged channels of the amp, pushing app 160 W X 2 (=320 W) to the sub.

If that is too complicated....in simple words, if you connect a sub to 4 channel amp, it would be app twice as loud (provided its DVC - dual voice coil) as compared to a situation when its connected to 2 channel (in this case the sub has to be SVC - single voice coil)

Hope it helps!
__________________
SINGH IS KINNNNNNNG..

Last edited by panky12345 : 15th September 2007 at 12:14.
panky12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2007, 13:58   #23 (permalink)
Team-BHP Support
 
navin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: mumbai
Posts: 12,576
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by panky12345 View Post
If that is too complicated....in simple words, if you connect a sub to 4 channel amp, it would be app twice as loud (provided its DVC - dual voice coil) as compared to a situation when its connected to 2 channel (in this case the sub has to be SVC - single voice coil)
panky you are talking about a 3db increase. it wont appear as twice as loud. more like "a tad louder".
__________________
Scixelsyd Etinu
navin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2007, 14:37   #24 (permalink)
Senior - BHPian
 
panky12345's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 1,589
Infractions: 0/1 (4)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by navin View Post
panky you are talking about a 3db increase. it wont appear as twice as loud. more like "a tad louder".
Agreed Sir! But given a case like this (powering DVC with 2 channels bridged), how much increase in loudness can be perceived. I'm noob with physics and such, cant relate db with RMS and their results.
__________________
SINGH IS KINNNNNNNG..
panky12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2007, 01:40   #25 (permalink)
Newbie
 
firingonallfour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 44
Default

ok I am officially confused now

But here is what I gather from the thread

1. i would have liked a powered bass tube .. but they dont sell them anymore'
2. I should go for a bass tube plus amp
3. There is a 2 channel amp, a 4 channel amp and a mono amp ( 2 channel being cheaper.. no one said much about a mono amp)
4. So I power the tube with a 2 channel amp or a mono amp( may be a 60.2 or some similar make) leave the four speakers as they are
5. This way I get the thump I need

Right ?
__________________
__________________________________________
If you don't like the way I drive, stay off the sidewalk!
firingonallfour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2007, 10:37   #26 (permalink)
Senior - BHPian
 
panky12345's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 1,589
Infractions: 0/1 (4)
Default

All you would get is just low notes with virtually no sound....trust me it'll be very very annoying!
__________________
SINGH IS KINNNNNNNG..
panky12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2007, 02:19   #27 (permalink)
Newbie
 
firingonallfour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 44
Default

Hi Guys I am sorry for the late response I was traveling. Took my car finally to Shreenath Motors, Milan Subway today. I discussed the idea of the subwoofer and tube with him. He opened up my rear speakers and turns out that they are plain janes - just simple paper cone speakers. So he suggested getting good 3 ways speakers in the rear and testing. I got JBL GTO937. The sound quality and bass has increased manifold. I am leaving it the way it is for now. Once I get tired of the base I will upgrade. I have noted your valuable inputs. I will use them when I upgrade. Thanks a lot guys for your help.
__________________
__________________________________________
If you don't like the way I drive, stay off the sidewalk!
firingonallfour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2007, 08:53   #28 (permalink)
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 1,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by navin View Post
panky you are talking about a 3db increase. it wont appear as twice as loud. more like "a tad louder".
Quote:
Originally Posted by panky12345 View Post
I'm noob with physics and such, cant relate db with RMS and their results.
!!!! That's no excuse for erroneous judgements!
anupmathur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2007, 12:08   #29 (permalink)
Team-BHP Support
 
navin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: mumbai
Posts: 12,576
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by panky12345 View Post
Agreed Sir! But given a case like this (powering DVC with 2 channels bridged), how much increase in loudness can be perceived. I'm noob with physics and such, cant relate db with RMS and their results.
the max SPL of a sub is dependant on the following:
1. the freq at which the measurements are done (Max SPL at 100hz is usually much higher than the at 50Hz).
2. the Max excursion of the subwoofer. Excursion is usually quoted as either linear one way, linear p-p (usually double of linear one way), max one way and max peak to peak.
3. the power available (do you have enough power to push the sub to max Xmax?)
4. the sub's install and alignment. for example a corner loaded horn will beahve different from an IB which will behave differently from a 3 chambered 6th order band pass, etc...

the number of coils does not make a difference exacpt it it's ablity to extract more current from the amplifier (when the coils are in parallel).

Also assuming the coils are 4 ohms each many car amps will not be happy about a running into a 2 ohm load (DVC bridged sub) when they are bridged (ch amp car amp).
__________________
Scixelsyd Etinu
navin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Toyota Camry amit The International Automotive Scene 24 18th November 2008 22:22
2004 Toyota Camry Bass&Trouble Sedans 16 27th September 2008 00:10
Upgrading from Toyota Camry? Jaggu Luxury, Imports & Niche 46 26th February 2008 23:04
Difference between Toyota Camry V4 and V6? yeis Technical Stuff 11 15th May 2006 16:49


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 14:55.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Team-BHP.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471