Go Back   Team-BHP > Under the Hood > In-Car Entertainment > Ask the Gurus

Ask the Gurus Post your ICE questions here


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 15th December 2008, 16:16   #1 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dehra Dun
Posts: 113
Default whether bridging and parallel wiring causes any degradation in sound quality?

hello friends
in my quest for a good 2 channel sq amplifier, that too on a limited budget, i came across an option to buy a low rms 4 channel amplifier (jbl gto 504) and to bridge the 4 channels (2 into 1 + 2 into 1), to power my 75 rms front components, now i have a slightly technical query, when i bridge 2 channels of an amplifier, then what kind of an output do i get, i mean is it a mono signal or a stereo and which is better quality wise, a single powerful channel powering a single 4 ohm component or 2 channeld bridged into 1 powering a single 4 ohm component, my only compulsoy requisite is total sq setup and the second part of my query is that does using the all 4 channels of an amplifier into bridged mode (2 into 1 + 2 into 1) to power the front 2 component 4 ohms each cause any degradation in sound quality? some sites recommend to never use all the channels of an amplifier in bridged mode, so where does that leave me, either to do the above or to wire my components in parallel so it presents a 2 ohm load to the amplifier, then that brings me to the third part of my query that if i use my components in parallel(2ohms)mode, will that cause any degradation in sound quality? gurus pleasethrow some light on the subject matter.
makanaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th December 2008, 16:52   #2 (permalink)
BHPian
 
DjNik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kolkata
Posts: 291
Default

The suggested way of wiring is not correct & hence not recommended.
DjNik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th December 2008, 17:09   #3 (permalink)
Senior - BHPian
 
Bass&Trouble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bombay
Posts: 2,508
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by makanaka
when i bridge 2 channels of an amplifier, then what kind of an output do i get, i mean is it a mono signal or a stereo and which is better quality wise,
Very Navinesque intentions.

There are many amplifiers that allow both summed mono and stereo bridging. It is a matter of which terminals are being used, and the input selector switch. I am not sure the JBL will provide this feature.

However, there is a workaround. Use a Y Splitter to split the left channel and feed it to both the inputs in Channel A, or 1/2, as the case may be. Likewise, right goes completely into Channel B or 3/4. And then connect the left speaker to Channel A and right speaker to channel B. You will have bridged stereo this way.

Quote:
Originally Posted by makanaka
some sites recommend to never use all the channels of an amplifier in bridged mode,
There are very few amps I have come across that have been unsuitable for operation as stated. One used to be a 4-ch from Sony. You will not face this issue with JBL. Especially when you are running the channels full range.

Quote:
Originally Posted by makanaka
either to do the above or to wire my components in parallel so it presents a 2 ohm load to the amplifier, then that brings me to the third part of my query that if i use my components in parallel(2ohms)mode, will that cause any degradation in sound quality?
I am not able to understand how you will benefit by doing this.

If you have just one set of comps, you will connect them to the same channel and lose stereo, AND have another channel idle in case of a 2-ch amplifier (3 for a 4-ch amplifier). Plus the output on 2 ohms in one channel will not be more than the output of both channels combined at 4 ohms.

If you have two sets of comps, you can do this and retain stereo but lose on fader. Yet with a 4-ch amp, you have 3 channels idle! And I do not suggest bridged 2 ohm with the concerned amp.

None of the above will however have a significant degrading or improving effect on "sound quality". At best, your comps will run healthier on account of the greater power running to them.
__________________
Losers Commute. We Ride.

Last edited by Bass&Trouble : 15th December 2008 at 17:11.
Bass&Trouble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th December 2008, 19:52   #4 (permalink)
Team-BHP Support
 
DerAlte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 2,912
Default

Why go to such lengths for the sake of matching the numeric figures from the specs? Why do you consider 50W rms / channel low without actually experiencing how loud it would go with the 75W components? You keep saying SQ, but ultimately want to reach SPL levels on a budget somehow? Think again, sir! Please audition first - any good dealer should be able to demonstrate the effect of independent Front and Rear, as well as summed Front and Rear.

IMHO summing FL+RL (and FR+RR) and then bridging the amp to 2 ch will give you a stereo image which will sound like headphones - SQ without decent imaging!!!
__________________
Never believe it cannot be done - it's only that you haven't found out how!!!
DerAlte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th December 2008, 22:54   #5 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dehra Dun
Posts: 113
Default

thanks friends for your replies, deralte, i dont have an idea how loud will a 50w rms input on a 75w driver sound, thats why just to be on the safe side i wanted to get an amplifier that can use the components to its full potential, i will try to listen to a 50w rms regular 2 channel amplifier before buying it, for sure, bass and trouble , i was thinking of bridging the 2 channels of a 2 channel amplifier and then wiring my only 1 pair of components to them in parallel, theoretically that way i will have the bridged mono output which is almost double to that of a single channel and again because now the components are presenting the load of 2 ohms, again the power deficiency would be addressed, this is just a query and i am trying to explore various options so pardon my ignorence friends ,
makanaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reva - tinny Ice Sound Quality Vicki_Rau Ask the Gurus 6 23rd March 2009 22:55
ICE for a true audiophile. Best 'real' sound quality? lynx Ask the Gurus 48 6th January 2009 18:12
Please help improve sound quality. nishant.mi Ask the Gurus 23 10th August 2008 17:50
Which (ICE Component) will make the most difference in Sound Quality? low_bass_makker Ask the Gurus 43 7th April 2008 11:00
Sound Quality not good on new ICE setup. Help! maverickzCar Ask the Gurus 24 28th December 2007 15:15


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 02:49.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Team-BHP.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607