|
| |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #5686 |
| Senior - BHPian | Yeah, have had to up the budget to about 18k already Blore bhpians - any volunteers ? Yeah, I did think there was too much in terms of the higher frequencies - but playing around with the equlizer setting did help a bit. Yes I did check out the Hertz (and some ppl suggested Bostons) but could not hear them. Yes, vocals, midranges and a mild soft bass would be it. Whats the primary diff in ovals/round ones for the rear - could avoid cutting/spacers unless theres a big diff. I'm saying this only cause all the speakers in my home theatre are round, and of course theres 3 but it sounds very "natural". I'm sory if my vocab is off the mark, I do play music and understand harmonics and octaves, but the technicalities lose me quick. |
| | |
| | #5687 | |
| Senior - BHPian | Quote:
So, the shape is stretched to an oval so that we get more cone surface area, as well as a smaller (narrower) install footprint. This narrow install footprint can be anywhere in the car, not just the rear parcel shelf. A 6x9 has the approximate cone surface area of an 8" woofer. We won't be able to fit an 8" woofer in each corner of the rear parcel shelf, right? Some manufacturers like Ford use a smaller oval size, a 5x7". Some purists say that a proper round speaker will give a better overall response than an oval speaker. I'd read quite a few such arguments on various forums long back. [Maybe we can all fight over it here too. I'm not tech enough, so I'll stand back & listen ]. I guess this is why in the home environment there are no ovals, just rounds. No space issues -- just sound quality maximisation issues.The reason I mentioned ovals for your rear is that you don't plan for a sub. So the only way to get some decent bass would be to use ovals. If you do plan for a sub sometime, a 6.5" round speaker would a better (and overall money-wise) choice. Don't cut your rear parcel shelf for ovals if the current provision allows for only rounds. Just use spacers. You'll be able to get ovals in there. There will be a difference in bass response between 6.5" coaxials and 6x9 coaxials. The 6x9s will give better bass. Your home speaker setup has 3 round speakers in the same box? That means you probably have a 3-way system. Nice! They would sound quite good! [Shameless self-promotion -- check out my TBHP Garage. You'll see 3-ways there too].Last edited by hydrashok : 8th April 2007 at 13:06. | |
| | |
| | #5688 |
| Senior - BHPian | Thanks again for a detailed education-of-the-novice! Hmm, am getting tempted to go with 6.5" inch (components?) at the rear too. And add an amp/sub later, or if budget permits (lotsa other redos - so gotta figure out total costs) So far, have not liked any of the 6x9s I've heard - but that does not include the Hertz ones, only the JBLs, Sonys etc, i.e. setup rather horridly I'd guess. Again, loking for Bangalorean volunteers to enlighten me.... |
| | |
| | #5689 |
| Senior - BHPian | If you prefer 6.5"s, go for co-axials in the rear. You really don't need components in the rear (you're sitting in the front, right?). As for Bangy boys, try posting here: http://www.team-bhp.com/forum/team-b...ets-bangy.html |
| | |
| | #5690 |
| Senior - BHPian | Depends on which series. We had the entry level stuff (6x9 - fx93, 5.25" front comps, cant remember the model) and ran them off an Alpine f240 for a short time but my cousin was not happy and he upgraded soon. Even I personally feel for the price its better to go with some other options. On the other hand bostons premium stuff is supposed to really sing, but Iv had no first hand experience. |
| | |
| | #5691 | |
| Senior - BHPian Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Bombay
Posts: 2,726
Thanked: 45 Times
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #5692 | |
| BHPian Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Kolkata
Posts: 574
Thanked: 6 Times
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #5693 |
| Senior - BHPian | Pioneer TS-W251R 10inches Subwoofers Shop Online; Gift in India: * Brand New ORIGINAL Pioneer TS-W251R 10inches Subwoofers Subs 1200W* Automobiles* Car Electronics* Car Speakers, Subwoofers, Boxes Buy mobile phones Gift Flowers Buy Indian Apparel Buy Books in India Buy Cameras Any good ? Can HUs drive subs directly ? (Sorry if this is another dumb noob question) |
| | |
| | #5694 | |
| Senior - BHPian Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Bombay
Posts: 2,726
Thanked: 45 Times
| Quote:
I didn't understand the need for a relay. The relay is inside the amp, that activates when it senses a signal from the remote lead. | |
| | |
| | #5695 | |
| Senior - BHPian | Quote:
Is your budget/plan getting out of hand? You'll need at least 10K to add a sub (sub + box + amp + wiring). At least. Better done at about 16K minimum if you want to get something that sounds good. And an OHC needs a bit of damping to take a sub, and that will be another 3K at least. Since the sub will be in the boot, you had best get a 12", and not a 10". And considering your taste, maybe a Pio entry-level sub (= Boom Boom) is not exactly for you. A JBL GT4-12 would be good.I'd suggest that you do the current upgrade (HU + speakers), wait for a bit and then do the sub and everything else as an upgrade later. Else you'll end up buying less-than-good stuff now, just to squeeze everything into a tight budget and regret everything later. And in any case I'm sure you need to keep the budget on a leash, considering all the other stuff you're getting done to the car. Sorry for sounding like I'm giving a lecture, but this is just a nudge. Please don't take it the wrong way. Your money, your call ![]() | |
| | |
| | #5696 |
| Senior - BHPian | hydrashok, the lecture's most welcome! Helps clear up the befuddled mind. What you said about not spending money on a less than optimal sub makes a lot of sense. Thanks. So - HU with 2/3 preouts (how critical are 3?), front components, rear 6.5" speakers. Add amp and sub later if needed. 8+6+4 now ? |
| | |
| | #5697 | |
| Senior - BHPian | Quote:
![]() Well, if you plan for a sub later, getting a 3 pre-out HU would be nice (maximum control over the sub and the amp driving the sub), but not absolutely essential. You may not get a 3 pre-out HU for 8K and don't break the bank just for 3 pre-outs. Even 2 pre-outs will be ok. Esp. with most Pio HUs (with 2 pre-outs), you can actually switch the rear pre-out to sub-out mode. So running the fronts and a sub from a 4-ch amp will make a lot of economic sense (without any loss of features/functions). The rear speakers can be run off the HU. Alternatively, you can also keep the front & rear speakers running off the HU and get a 2-ch amp/mono amp (for a sub), fed by the sub-out. 8 + 6 + 4 should do it now. ![]() Last edited by hydrashok : 9th April 2007 at 00:03. | |
| | |
| | #5698 | |
| Team-BHP Support ![]() Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: mumbai
Posts: 17,960
Thanked: 1,111 Times
| Quote:
Glass wool should be about 1-2 lbs per cu. ft. Anymore and it is too much. I Staple it to the walls. Let me know if you prefer 2 8" subs to a 12". You might notice that you loose some low end extention and get some mid bass slam. | |
| | |
| | #5699 |
| BHPian | Hi Navin Sir, After playing around with various permutations and combinations this is what my present settings are. The car being one of the few places where I am actually listen to music, I wanted the best I could get (within my budget) and I must admit am pretty satisfied and proud now. Settings: 1) Turned down bass boost (from the amp) down from 12 db to around round about 4 db or so - as above. 2) Loudness (compensates for deficiencies in the low- and high-sound ranges at low volume) to mid. Whenever I need a bit more 'thump,' I turn the loudness from mid to high. Or from mid to low, when my tympanic membranes are tired. 3) Subwoofer cut-off frequency to 80 (-2) Hz. 4) HPF on and at 50 Hz. 5) Bass Frequency (for level adjustment) - not really sure what it does to 40 (+1), bass is equal to treble under these settings. 6) Compression and BMX functions of the HU: I have set it off. The manual says "Using COMP and BMX functions let you adjust the sound playback quality of this player. Each of the functions has a two-step adjustment. The COMP function balances the output of louder and softer sounds at higher volumes. BMX controls sound reverberations to give playback a fuller sound." I just found that the sound (of the bass) was best with both of them off. The bass seems just right for a wide variety of music (Classic Country to Rock to Mozart). Also, thankfully you can't hear much of the 'boom' when you are outside the car (for passersby) - and I sure like this. Impression/Plan 1) Bass can probably be tighter - not sure if the Wagon R really is more suited for a smaller diameter sub like 10"? Have not tried out the two 8" idea as yet - I will probably run this setup for a while now as it is. 2) The Wagon R is not the ideal car for ICE - especially not for the Boom variety -- I will need damping done in the future. 3) I am contemplating a HU upgrade soon. I feel it will improve the sound quality. I can pass on the present HU (Pio 5850) to my brother who recently bought a Swift. I am looking at the blaus for a possible buy. 4) I am trying to get genuine Audison/Monster interconnects - I am using local (read fake) ones right now. 3) I thought I could play the music now and then with the bass turned off. I realized I just can't - I am addicted to the boom now! Thanks once again for all your inputs. Last edited by johy : 9th April 2007 at 13:43. |
| | |
| | #5700 | |
| BHPian Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Kolkata
Posts: 574
Thanked: 6 Times
| Quote:
| |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OE Replacement - Navigation System for Cruze "Mega Audio" | lawyer | Sound Off and Show Off | 36 | 15th September 2012 11:43 |
| "Kicker" audio setup in my Hyundai Sonata | Frankenstein | Sound Off and Show Off | 9 | 4th March 2011 13:35 |
| Car audio losing sound at low rpms! EDIT : Solved by "The Steg" | GTO | Ask the Gurus | 162 | 23rd November 2010 17:27 |
| sub enclosure advice from audio gurus | clipto333 | Ask the Gurus | 22 | 4th January 2007 10:29 |