Go Back   Team-BHP > Under the Hood > In-Car Entertainment


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 19th July 2007, 14:14   #76
Senior - BHPian
 
headers's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Greater Chennai
Posts: 4,589
Thanked: 454 Times
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by headers View Post
LBM, and Gurus, I've changed my rear speakers to a JBL GTO 937.. The music sounds much better now..fast beats are now audible..but in songs like.."Billie Jean - Michael Jackson" where there is a secondary bass guitar..there is complete mayhem..we hear either a continuous boom or..too much noise.. I'm still not sure how to make the port..the local guy [not a professional installer] just tells me he'll do a hole for around 3 to 4" dia ..but am wondering if it will screw things up further..

I understand that the sub is a free air one..but i need to install it in my Gypsy..help please!! ANd thanks..i'm finding this thread very informative..
With reference to the above, LBM, Navin and gurus..I burnt the same song ..or rather converted to 128 KBPS from existing 256 KBPS..and the extra claimed noise has dissappeared. Can you tell me why? Still havent managed to port my SUB..

Cheers
headers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2007, 16:46   #77
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Faridabad
Posts: 6,814
Thanked: 294 Times
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by headers View Post
With reference to the above, LBM, Navin and gurus..I burnt the same song ..or rather converted to 128 KBPS from existing 256 KBPS..and the extra claimed noise has dissappeared. Can you tell me why? Still havent managed to port my SUB..

Cheers
It might be you have changed some setting...which is causing the differnce.

But it might be that the MP3 quality which is reduced..and causing this
low_bass_makker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th July 2007, 09:57   #78
Team-BHP Support
 
navin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: mumbai
Posts: 22,505
Thanked: 3,882 Times
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by headers View Post
With reference to the above, LBM, Navin and gurus..I burnt the same song ..or rather converted to 128 KBPS from existing 256 KBPS..and the extra claimed noise has dissappeared. Can you tell me why? Still havent managed to port my SUB..
Such noise cannot be attributed to just a change in bit rate. Maybe your earlier 128k rip was not done well.
navin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2007, 12:46   #79
Senior - BHPian
 
headers's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Greater Chennai
Posts: 4,589
Thanked: 454 Times
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by navin View Post
Such noise cannot be attributed to just a change in bit rate. Maybe your earlier 128k rip was not done well.
No Navin, I think the Sound quality reduces with 128KBPS..the optimal i'm told is 160 or 192KBPS and 256 is an overkill..

But the surprising fact is that the noise dissappears with reduction in bit quality..That was just an experiment i made and wanted to share the results with you guys.

Ofcourse..The porting of my Sub is not yet done..

AM infact planning to relocate the JBLs under the drivers seat and the SUB elsewhere..[http://galleryvikram.fotopic.net/c1292978.html]

Need sugestions ..i would like to retain the loading area at the back and listen to good music
headers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2007, 12:53   #80
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Faridabad
Posts: 6,814
Thanked: 294 Times
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by headers View Post
No Navin, I think the Sound quality reduces with 128KBPS..the optimal i'm told is 160 or 192KBPS and 256 is an overkill..
No Sir 256 is not a overkill....
low_bass_makker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2007, 13:00   #81
Senior - BHPian
 
headers's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Greater Chennai
Posts: 4,589
Thanked: 454 Times
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by low_bass_makker View Post
No Sir 256 is not a overkill....
Well LBM, why not..? I heard it IS an overkill only by surfing the web..frankly for me is what matters most is the quality of the music and not the technical jargon!!

Pardon my ignorance..
headers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2007, 13:19   #82
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Faridabad
Posts: 6,814
Thanked: 294 Times
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by headers View Post
Well LBM, why not..? I heard it IS an overkill only by surfing the web..frankly for me is what matters most is the quality of the music and not the technical jargon!!

Pardon my ignorance..
I think you missed this thread...


http://www.team-bhp.com/forum/ask-gu...s-mp3-etc.html
low_bass_makker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2007, 13:50   #83
Team-BHP Support
 
navin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: mumbai
Posts: 22,505
Thanked: 3,882 Times
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by headers View Post
Well LBM, why not..? I heard it IS an overkill only by surfing the web....
check out Hydrogenaudio Forums.
navin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A/C blower 1 and 2 setting not working Dippy Technical Stuff 13 13th November 2009 15:36
Which one: Dual 8" sub V/s Single 10" sub? Invinsible In-Car Entertainment 53 28th May 2009 13:33
ground zero Sub vs image dynamics Sub rohanGT In-Car Entertainment 105 29th March 2009 05:01


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 14:08.

Copyright 2000 - 2017, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks