Go Back   Team-BHP > Under the Hood > In-Car Entertainment


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 9th February 2007, 22:10   #16
BHPian
 
sk456's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: @Noida/Gurgaon
Posts: 570
Thanked: 7 Times
Default

uglu ugly ugly....... total annhilation...look like explodes...morels look slghtly more presentable than the polks thogh..

Last edited by sk456 : 9th February 2007 at 22:17.
sk456 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2007, 00:12   #17
Team-BHP Support
 
navin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: mumbai
Posts: 22,509
Thanked: 3,884 Times
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Kapasi View Post
Here is a Morel High end speaker. lol, I like it boss, it's Full On!! but it is D.I.S.C.O., strike one more name off your list old man.
I have to brush up on my grill making skills. these guys are all going DISCO.
P.S. the grill for the sub in m Octy (B&T postes a pic sometime ago) was made by me.
navin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2007, 02:29   #18
elf
BANNED
 
elf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bombay
Posts: 1,034
Thanked: 9 Times
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by navin View Post
... the grill for the sub in m Octy (B&T postes a pic sometime ago) was made by me. ...
Aunty show pichhar pliss?
elf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2007, 08:27   #19
Team-BHP Support
 
Vid6639's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 14,469
Thanked: 19,377 Times
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elf View Post
Aunty show pichhar pliss?

here you go elf:

http://www.team-bhp.com/forum/car-en...tml#post366626 (The Verna Audio Thread)
Vid6639 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2007, 00:18   #20
BHPian
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chennai-Bangalore-Mangalore
Posts: 77
Thanked: 0 Times
Default

the Polk Momo 6X9 Speakers mmc 690 is the best 6x9 speakers out there
its really good and with a good amp the volume can be pushed to the limits and u still get very clear and awsome sounding music and good bass

for those who have a budget get this it wont dissapoint u
gautamballal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2007, 03:51   #21
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Sam Kapasi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mumbai (but wat
Posts: 6,989
Thanked: 1,452 Times
Default

Thank you gautam. You're on a page digging expedition aren't you?
Sam Kapasi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2007, 13:47   #22
BHPian
 
akbaree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 585
Thanked: 48 Times
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blueraven316 View Post
Now, why an Alpine mono ? Anwar said the Polk momo Monoblock could not run the two subs and did not deliver enough juice, though i did not hear the POLK mono play, With the Alpine head and MRD amp setup was sounding nice. Tuned for clarity, subs sounded pretty tight, Speakers were good, but the component 6.5s had too much treble for a speaker at that price range, and started giving up a little earlier than it should have, on pumping up the volume. Overall sounds pretty neat though, pretty crisp midbass at medium volume levels.
The Polk Momo 4 channel amp can pump only 75 RMS to each channel. The components are 125 RMS each. And that's why they give up before you expect them to give up. If there would have been a more powerful amp, say 125 RMS pumping in each of the components, then the sound would have been much better. I have powered my MMC 6500 with RF P450.2 (100 RMS x 2) and they are awesome. At very high level the voice distorts a little bit but that's because my amp doesn't has all the power to supply to the components.
akbaree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2007, 17:29   #23
BHPian
 
clipto333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: jalandhar
Posts: 912
Thanked: 5 Times
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by akbaree View Post
The Polk Momo 4 channel amp can pump only 75 RMS to each channel. The components are 125 RMS each. And that's why they give up before you expect them to give up. If there would have been a more powerful amp, say 125 RMS pumping in each of the components, then the sound would have been much better. I have powered my MMC 6500 with RF P450.2 (100 RMS x 2) and they are awesome. At very high level the voice distorts a little bit but that's because my amp doesn't has all the power to supply to the components.
hi,

you saw the date when BR posted??

i think gautam has revived old threads on more than one occasion thats why sam said "page digging expedition" , right sam?

anyway, i think 75w rms is quite fine to power a 125w rms comp. im powering my 100w comps with 75w amp and they play really nice

And BTW the alpine amp was used to power the sub, not the comps. :-)

cheers
clip
clipto333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2007, 17:43   #24
BHPian
 
akbaree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 585
Thanked: 48 Times
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by clipto333 View Post
hi,

you saw the date when BR posted??

i think gautam has revived old threads on more than one occasion thats why sam said "page digging expedition" , right sam?

anyway, i think 75w rms is quite fine to power a 125w rms comp. im powering my 100w comps with 75w amp and they play really nice

And BTW the alpine amp was used to power the sub, not the comps. :-)

cheers
clip
I think I mentioned Polk Momo amp. Did I mention Alpine? I never said that 75 RMS amp cannot be used to power 125 RMS speaker. I just said it would not be great enough. Again I also said I am also powering my Polk Momo components with a 100 RMS amp and it sounds great. Again I just shared my opinion.

Well I have just started posting and may be look at the thread time more carefully. It is so easy to miss it. There is so much of information that you get lost. This site is too good for people who want to know things and share things.
akbaree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2007, 17:53   #25
Senior - BHPian
 
sammyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurgaon/Doon
Posts: 1,738
Thanked: 338 Times
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Kapasi View Post
Here is a Morel High end speaker. lol, I like it boss, it's Full On!! but it is D.I.S.C.O., strike one more name off your list old man.
hmm are these dissected ladybirds ?
sammyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2007, 02:21   #26
BHPian
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chennai-Bangalore-Mangalore
Posts: 77
Thanked: 0 Times
Default

i have powered the polk momo mmc 690 with a earthquake amp (130watts rms *4) 600W.4 Untitled Document

front i have focal components
gautamballal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2007, 10:36   #27
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Faridabad
Posts: 6,814
Thanked: 294 Times
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gautamballal View Post
i have powered the polk momo mmc 690 with a earthquake amp (130watts rms *4) 600W.4 Untitled Document

front i have focal components
which model of focal do you have in front?
low_bass_makker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th July 2007, 13:27   #28
BHPian
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chennai-Bangalore-Mangalore
Posts: 77
Thanked: 0 Times
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by low_bass_makker View Post
which model of focal do you have in front?
i have the Focal Polyglass 165 V1 6.5'' component speakers
gautamballal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th July 2007, 16:23   #29
BHPian
 
clipto333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: jalandhar
Posts: 912
Thanked: 5 Times
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by akbaree View Post
I think I mentioned Polk Momo amp. Did I mention Alpine? I never said that 75 RMS amp cannot be used to power 125 RMS speaker. I just said it would not be great enough. Again I also said I am also powering my Polk Momo components with a 100 RMS amp and it sounds great. Again I just shared my opinion.

Well I have just started posting and may be look at the thread time more carefully. It is so easy to miss it. There is so much of information that you get lost. This site is too good for people who want to know things and share things.
hi, im sorry for that. i got confused(maybe because of momo-mono) but why so rude? people make mistakes sometimes right? :-)

IMO, the comps are not giving up, the amp is. another reason could be the comps are crossed over lower than they should.

cheers
clip
clipto333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st July 2007, 10:13   #30
Team-BHP Support
 
navin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: mumbai
Posts: 22,509
Thanked: 3,884 Times
Default

The difference between similarly designed 75W and 100W amps is 1db! The 100W amp you used must have had more headroom than the 75W amp to sound so much better.

BTW most woofers are more limited by their physical excursion limits than thermal. Try feeding you 6" woofer 75W at 30Hz and see.
navin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Polk audio speaker dealers? jp1 In-Car Entertainment 25 12th August 2014 20:57
Confused between Pioneer 308d4 or Polk db1240 or Polk db1212 althaaf In-Car Entertainment 10 27th October 2011 14:03
Polk MOMO Swift blueraven316 In-Car Entertainment 44 13th August 2007 20:49
HU Query for JBL speakers was "Polk MOMO vs db Compos" hyper-VTEC In-Car Entertainment 43 13th December 2006 15:03
Polk Momo C 500.1 Mono Block AMP freakrz In-Car Entertainment 24 3rd June 2006 11:12


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 18:15.

Copyright 2000 - 2017, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks