Go Back   Team-BHP > Under the Hood > In-Car Entertainment


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th June 2009, 04:49   #226
BHPian
 
ibm_jennifer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Chennai
Posts: 529
Thanked: 7 Times
Default

Quote:
Also if you are limited by hardware throughput nothing on codec part can overcome if decoded data exceeds the limit.
Man, My question is How your Audio Terminology "DECODING LIMIT" refers to analog audio? I know about digital and I never asked anybody to go with digital output in car.

How its possible that the decoded data exceeds the limit? Whats the limit here?

And for your information MLP is necessary for DVD-Audio because of the throughput limit of DVDs. A 24/96 at 5.1 Audio needs 13.8Mbps in LPCM but DVDs throughput limit is 9.8Mbps. So MLP is accepted as a standard to overcome the limitation of DVDs. And there is no decoding limitation because any of the available 24/192 DAC can handle upto 25Mbps easily. But as you said it may affect the digitla out. But WHO THE HELL ASKED YOU TO USE DIGITAL OUT in a car? And where you will buy a DIGITAL Reciever/Amplifier in car which has a 24/192 DAC?

PLEASE DON'T JUMP OUT OF THE TOPIC AND AVOID DISCUSSING about HOME DTS RECEIVERS or EMBEDDED SYSTEMS. I ALREADY AGREED THAT ALL YOUR STATEMENTS ARE TRUE and Those who follow my statements are stupids as I AM AN IDIOT.

Quote:
Becuase sound card manufacturer is scaling down as per thier own spec
Fantastic, Can you prove this? Can you prove me that A 24/192 Khz capable sound card DOWNSAMPLE the TRUEHD/DTS-MA audio in its analog output? Please this is WHAT I AM ASKING YOU FOR YEARS!!!

Quote:
Who told you BMC is an algorithm ?
I am sorry, but I studied to encode a binary data you need an algorithm: Biphase mark code - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quote:
And the 2 192Khz Channel on SPDIF is possible with any manufacturer not just Asus.
But we need 24/96 at 5.1 man and can you prove me your statement is TRUE in any other sound card other than HDAV?

Quote:
The third option is via the S/PDIF (or TOSLINK) digital interface. However, because of concerns over unauthorized copying, DVD-A players are required to handle this digital interface in one of the following ways:
  • Turn such an interface off completely. This option is preferred by the music publishers.
  • Downconvert the audio to a 2-channel 16-bit/48 kHz PCM signal. The music publishers are not enthusiastic about this because it permits the production of a CD-quality copy, something they still expect to sell, besides DVD-A.
  • Downconvert the audio to 2 channels, but keeping the original sample size and bit rate if the producer sets a flag on the DVD-A disc telling the player to do so.
But why dont you stop posting in this thread or please answer this question first:


WHERE FROM YOU LEARNED "DTS-MA or TRUEHD scaled down (means downsample) in ANALOG OUTPUT"?

If you cant answer: POTHITTU PO!

Last edited by ibm_jennifer : 7th June 2009 at 05:05.
ibm_jennifer is offline   Received Infraction
Old 7th June 2009, 11:07   #227
Team-BHP Support
 
navin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: mumbai
Posts: 22,509
Thanked: 3,884 Times
Default

Thread closed to everyone has cooled of. You can google many things but there is a lot google cannot dig up - atleast I cant find it.
navin is offline  
Old 8th June 2009, 11:03   #228
Team-BHP Support
 
navin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: mumbai
Posts: 22,509
Thanked: 3,884 Times
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by amitk26 View Post
I would have loved if you would have done little search before coming up with this idiotic blabber.

Dear poser and fake
Quote:
Originally Posted by ibm_jennifer View Post
You don't know whats decoding and someone thought you that DIGITAL output is better than Analog output and youa re just catching the point. Do you believe, its TRUE?

Man, Again please dont push around. Who the hell asked you about VIDEO. If you dont know to answer me please keep quite.

What's Navin/Sam/Dealtre comments now?
This thread was closed not because the discussion got too technical but becuse members started bringing their egos to the table.

The text in bold in the above quoted posts are examples of poor attitude. TBHP does not tolerate such behaviour. Both of you (IBM and Amit) are welcome to post as long as the posts are not abusive and maintain TBHP's standards of decorum.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ibm_jennifer View Post
What's Navin/Sam/Dealtre comments now?
Like Sam said below, neither of us wanted to get involved in a debate where ill-manners and egos are involved.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Kapasi View Post
This highly technical debate would have been mildly enjoyable if there weren't any egos and ill-manners involved.

By the way I thought Urmila was lovely in Rangeela.
BTW Sam who/what is Rangeela and Unrimla?
navin is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Santro v/s BMW X5 v/s Safari v/s Bolero v/s Volvo 5000 VictorSinha Street Experiences 17 4th December 2009 17:50
Tata Safari Dicor LX 4 X 2 or Safari Dicor EX 4 x 2 Digitalmafia SUVs, MUVs & 4x4s 55 1st June 2009 17:31
Safari EX 4x4 5000 km Review and Impressions THE-U- Long-Term Ownership Reviews 25 17th August 2007 08:22
Lilliput!!! - 5000 Kilometre milestone report (Safari LX) sumitsingh Long-Term Ownership Reviews 18 20th February 2007 09:41
suggest car for 5000 km per month Max Sedans 39 16th December 2005 13:38


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 09:46.

Copyright 2000 - 2017, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks