Go Back   Team-BHP > Around the Corner > Shifting gears > Gadgets, Computers & Software

Gadgets, Computers & Software PDAs, Laptops, Digi-Cams, Softwares and more


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 15th October 2009, 10:49   #3061 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 530
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sawyer View Post
I have used a Bravia 40 LCD for a year now, and while it works fine, the image quality drops off very quickly as one moves off center, the images can be seen but the colors get washed out. So, two questions - what distance do you view it from, and, lets say you put in 5 chairs in front of it at that distance, side by side with foot of space between each - would the image quality be close that in the center chair, from the two chairs at either ends. I am referring to use for DVD/Blu ray playback.
I have checked the Panasonic 32X9 LCD in Ezone and believe me it has superb viewing angle compared to any other.
zaks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2009, 12:00   #3062 (permalink)
BHPian
 
msdivy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by muralisk View Post
Just want to update, that, I did pick up Panasonic Plasma - G10 P42. Yesterday it was delivered and installed at my place
....
Congrats !
I have 2 queries:
1. Did you compare with C10 for non HD & HD content? How is the response for cable/DTH signal?
2. Any info on Viera Cast?
msdivy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2009, 12:05   #3063 (permalink)
Senior - BHPian
 
Sahil's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bombay
Posts: 3,069
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shuvc View Post
Not that I noticed. It was fairly similar. And IMO, for majorly DTH viewing it's better to go for a 32". The pixellations etc will be less visible at say a 8ft distance than a 40" TV.

One difference that I did feel was there - the angle of viewing was better in the 530. Picture did not fade away as much as compared to the 450.

I went for the FHD since a) I would be watching some DVDs on it and b) given the 3-4K I decided to go for the higher 5 series and "on paper" better technology. The 5 series looks good too.
Had to settle for the 450 since the 530 was not in stock. My mother insisted the TV must come on Dhanterus.

Even the 530 in 32inch does not come with the upscaling DVD !
__________________
______________
__________
______
__
Sahil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2009, 17:43   #3064 (permalink)
BHPian
 
appuchan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bangy
Posts: 600
Default

I too have got delivery of my G10 a couple of days back. Have posted my opinion so far with its performance using various sources in the HifiVision forum.
__________________
I am an eco-driver
appuchan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2009, 09:29   #3065 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 530
Default

After much deliberation and looking at my pass book finally went yesterday to E-Zone for the second time in two weeks and confirmed what I had seen earlier- The Panasonic 32X9D was looking better or same as the Samsung B450, LG LH20 which are more pricey, so swiped the card bought it without further ado. They had no freebies for this panny model since it was priced the lowest at 29,900 but I managed to bargain 1K off and got it for 28,900 which is the best VFM out there I think.

I was interested in the 42C10 but since it is slightly bigger for our living room I instead went for the 32" LCD and at that size I don't have to worry about FHD too. Now with the saved $$ I can also think of some decent HTiB .
zaks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2009, 10:35   #3066 (permalink)
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 59
Infractions: 0/3 (12)
Default

Going through this thread many times and unable to decide many times weather to buy Plasma or LCD, finally bought home LG Plasma 42PQ30 on 16th. Picture quality looks better than LCD. It has cost me Rs.37000 net by credit card after too much of bargaining, though I missed a chance at Ebay last month, deal was for Rs.35000 and 6 months installments.
The problem is we have put it in the bedroom and viewing distances only 9-10 feet and feel I should be at least 15 feet for 42" TV, what do you suggest ?
jacksons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2009, 13:25   #3067 (permalink)
Senior - BHPian
 
aadix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: hyderabad
Posts: 1,475
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacksons View Post
The problem is we have put it in the bedroom and viewing distances only 9-10 feet and feel I should be at least 15 feet for 42" TV, what do you suggest ?

extrmely good price for the panel! and with regards to the distance, it should be more than enough. anything from 6 feet onwards is more than ok for a 42".
__________________
"live to ride,ride to eliminate"
aadix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2009, 14:19   #3068 (permalink)
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 59
Infractions: 0/3 (12)
Default

Quote:
extrmely good price for the panel! and with regards to the distance, it should be more than enough. anything from 6 feet onwards is more than ok for a 42".
I understand but 6 feet is too less for 42" TV, It should be at least 10 feet because otherwise picture will be very blurr and you will have move your neck from one side to other side quite often and will be pain.
jacksons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2009, 15:27   #3069 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 775
Default

I can vouch that 9 feet is a good distance for a 42" HD ready plasma/lcd
jassi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2009, 15:41   #3070 (permalink)
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pune
Posts: 1,011
Default

It all depends on what is the quality of the source. With even an upscaling DVD player as an input, the correct distance to watch a movie comes down to 2/2.5 times the screen size, this means a viewing distance of 7-9 feet.
__________________
If anything is worth doing, it is worth doing well
Sawyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2009, 19:48   #3071 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 530
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sawyer View Post
It all depends on what is the quality of the source. With even an upscaling DVD player as an input, the correct distance to watch a movie comes down to 2/2.5 times the screen size, this means a viewing distance of 7-9 feet.
It is absurd to make a calculation for viewing distance when one already has the TV. Just move back until the display seems clean and sharp enough.
zaks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2009, 19:57   #3072 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Edsel Rulez!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 142
Default

As mentioned earlier, if all you're watching is the craþþy stream served up by the neighbourhood cablewallah, you'd probably find the picture produced by a 21" CRT much better than a 42" plasma.
Edsel Rulez! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2009, 22:07   #3073 (permalink)
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 59
Infractions: 0/3 (12)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Edsel Rulez! View Post
As mentioned earlier, if all you're watching is the craþþy stream served up by the neighbourhood cablewallah, you'd probably find the picture produced by a 21" CRT much better than a 42" plasma.
In fact crt is much better any time in picture quality than Lcd or Plasma, thats what I have found.
jacksons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th October 2009, 08:32   #3074 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 530
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacksons View Post
In fact crt is much better any time in picture quality than Lcd or Plasma, thats what I have found.
Unqualified statements like this cause a lot of confusion to people. If CRT was much better why would companies invest millions of $$ on developing LCD and Plasma? The correct answer is CRT is good for old style analog transmissions but LCD/Plasma beat CRT hands down in new high resolution digital transmission and media format.
zaks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th October 2009, 11:35   #3075 (permalink)
BHPian
 
msdivy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zaks View Post
....
If CRT was much better why would companies invest millions of $$ on developing LCD and Plasma? The correct answer is CRT is good for old style analog transmissions but LCD/Plasma beat CRT hands down in new high resolution digital transmission and media format.
CRT has its advantages:
  1. Resolution & Aspect Ratio- Operate at any resolution, geometry and aspect ratio without the need for rescaling the image.
  2. Black-Level - Produce a very dark black.
  3. White Saturation - Bright-end of the intensity scale is very rugged
  4. Contrast - Produce the highest static contrast levels
  5. Gray-Scale - perfectly smooth gray-scale
  6. Gamma shape of the gray-scale- close to a perfect power-law,
  7. Color and Gray-Scale Accuracy - the very best color and gray-scale.
  8. Motion Artifacts - Have fast response times and no motion artifacts. Best for rapidly moving or changing images.
  9. Cost - Less expensive than comparable displays using other display technologies.
Where it loses out:
  1. Physical size - The picture tube makes it bulky
  2. Emissions - Give off electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields.
Due to the clear images it produces, graphic designers in our company still prefer CRT monitors.
msdivy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best Movies, Documentaries, games, etc to Showcase your hi-def plasma/lcd & HTS jassi Shifting gears 57 13th October 2009 20:06
LCD Display for Santro shashankre Ask the Gurus 15 26th June 2007 11:40
LED alloy wheels that can display virtually any image while you drive! Neo. Tyre & Alloy wheel Section 26 17th August 2006 16:12


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 19:10.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Team-BHP.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607