Go Back   Team-BHP > Around the Corner > Shifting gears > Gadgets, Computers & Software

Gadgets, Computers & Software PDAs, Laptops, Digi-Cams, Softwares and more


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 15th October 2007, 20:40   #421 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pune
Posts: 202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ST7677 View Post
Ah thanks, that was very helpful.

So you mean that there is practically no harmful radiation from a Plasma Display panel and I can safely consider it with toddlers at home...

(of course other issues leading to eye strain would be still there).
All this I said from point of a physics/electronics grad. Quantitative analysis of biological effect on human from plasma v/s CRT is unknown to us.

I never heard anybody had biological cell pattern changed due to EM radiation of TV or bone damaged due to X-ray from TV. Though eye functions are affected by any kind of TV watching for long time. Its subject of study. And all this by-product contribute along with eye straining.

Please make sure about your thoughts from other source.
omishra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2007, 20:52   #422 (permalink)
Senior - BHPian
 
X-Machine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mumbai/Tokyo
Posts: 1,394
Default

Hi. Well, i buy LCDs in quantity of 20-30 per month for my business. No, i am not a dealer. The thing is, i got a call from BenQ this morning stating that they have recently launched thier LCDs in India and are offering great discounted prices for the same. They will be coming over to my office tommorow with the price-list. Has anyone used BenQ Lcds? If yes, how are they?
__________________
------->> X <<-------
X-Machine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2007, 22:15   #423 (permalink)
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: hyderabad
Posts: 11
Default Sony bravia

I hav decided for sony bravia klv-40v300a bcoz of its bravia engine.. and getting for a good deal of 91k ( mrp 99990 )... not going for samsung because the specs r moreover same and in some cases sony has better features than samsung... leaving the glossy finish of the samsung
ravimittal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2007, 10:41   #424 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pune
Posts: 202
Default correction

Sorry, Correction for below statements-
Quote:
Originally Posted by omishra View Post
2. Direct the same towards phosphor material surface. IN CRT it is Phosphor between negative charged porous screen (Cathode) and in plasma it is transprant conducting surface with low -ve volts.
Please read as -
2. Direct the same towards phosphor material surface. IN CRT it is Phosphor between positive charged porous screen (Anode) and in plasma it is transprant conducting surface with +ve charge.
omishra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2007, 11:44   #425 (permalink)
BHPian
 
ST7677's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 819
Default

X- Machine, do check it out yourself by keeping it next to your existing TVs...

Quote:
Originally Posted by ravimittal
I hav decided for sony bravia klv-40v300a bcoz of its bravia engine.. and getting for a good deal of 91k ( mrp 99990 )... not going for samsung because the specs r moreover same and in some cases sony has better features than samsung... leaving the glossy finish of the samsung
Though on paper Samsung might beat Sony, but Sony's picture quality is anytime better than the Samsung.
And the Gloss Finish - frankly speaking, in real world it (or the blue accent light) doesn't lool so good as Samsung makes it out to be.
But VFM, after including Tata Sky and other discounts you get on Samsung, make Samsung a very compelling option.

If you can afford Sony, go for it. Is 91k the best offer for klv-40v300a??
ST7677 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2007, 11:58   #426 (permalink)
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: hyderabad
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ST7677 View Post
If you can afford Sony, go for it. Is 91k the best offer for klv-40v300a??
As of now this is the best offer I am getting. Samsung maybe a few thousand bucks cheaper but at the end lcd also stands for brand consciousness. A Sony is any day known to be better when it comes to televisions. Any guest coming to your home will see a Sony and be more impressed than a Samsung. I ve seen it!! Not many know about an lcd unless one intends to buy one.

I have a doubt. Will normal cable connection clarity be poor in lcd viewing? And will TataSky or Dishtv solve these problems?
ravimittal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2007, 13:19   #427 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 775
Smile

I am using tatasky on my sony 42" and the quality is excellent as compared to the local cable wallah I am sure the same holds true for dishtv.

I am not sure about the resolutions provided by these though (maybe 720i) compared to a cable walah (standard definition or 480i sd)
jassi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2007, 13:55   #428 (permalink)
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Shan2nu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hubli - Karnataka - India
Posts: 4,788
Default

Quote:
I am not sure about the resolutions provided by these though (maybe 720i) compared to a cable walah (standard definition or 480i sd)
Can't be 720 coz the TataSky reciever doesn't support HDMI or Component output (which is mandatory for recieving 720i/p).

TS prob uses the same 480 or the slightly better 576 resolution.

I have 720 resolution vids on my computer and TS signal is nowhere close to it.

Shan2nu

Last edited by Shan2nu : 17th October 2007 at 14:02.
Shan2nu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2007, 13:59   #429 (permalink)
Senior - BHPian
 
mobike008's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 3,229
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ravimittal View Post
I hav decided for sony bravia klv-40v300a bcoz of its bravia engine.. and getting for a good deal of 91k ( mrp 99990 )... not going for samsung because the specs r moreover same and in some cases sony has better features than samsung... leaving the glossy finish of the samsung
Ravi, did you look at Samsung's R81? How do you like that compared to Sony? Any idea what is the price they quoted you on it recently? I am planning to get one soon.
__________________
I have terrible reflexes- I was once run over by a car being pushed by two guys !!!!!!!
mobike008 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2007, 14:15   #430 (permalink)
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N.A
Posts: 6,029
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ST7677 View Post
Very True...

I have been waiting for last couple of years to get a good Flat TV under a lac. But even today what you get is mostly crap.

LCDs have blurring and over saturation images (unreal color), the extra brightness they offer tends to create eye strain in home environment.

Plasmas still are not Full HD (1080p), are heavy and fragile, emit radiation (mfgs claim it is safe, but it still does emits radiation), limited Computer connectivity, have burn it issues, consume lots of power.

Every year around this time I start looking at these TVs but still not convinced about replacing the tube with these so called upmarket gadgets :(
I used to be like you till a few months back, and then I bought one anyway. Now I really enjoy watching movies on Television - our friendly neighbourhood video shop is thrilled because we end up picking 2-3 movies EVERY weekend where we used to rent out once in a month earlier.

Go for it - its worth it. I bought Plasma and not LCD - the Panasonic Viera because all Vieras looked like they had the best images of the lot in a showroom filled with Plasmas and LCDs of every size, brand and type.
__________________
It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.
- J Krishnamurti
Steeroid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2007, 14:40   #431 (permalink)
BHPian
 
black12rr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: bangalore
Posts: 570
Default

^^ But plasmas eat tons of power . I heard they consume as much as full loaded AC unit .
Googled an found out a 50 inch will consume 500 watts !
__________________
Do it your way .......

180Dtsi -16bhp
Zen -61bhp
Busa -200bhp ....? .

Last edited by black12rr : 17th October 2007 at 14:42.
black12rr is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2007, 16:11   #432 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 775
Smile

if you want something thats under a lac, then look at lcd projection tvs. I bought my sony 42" 3lcd for 58k and the image quality is excellent. The only difference is you cannot wall mount and there is a vertical viewing angle limitation (60degrees).
In my case i did not want to wall mount and also I am well within the vertical viewing angle of 60 degrees. Horizontal viewing angle is the same as lcd and so is the PQ

Heres the link with prices.
Sony India : 3LCD Projection TV

Sony India : KF-42E200A (KF42E200A) : Details

Note - this tv has the same bravia engine on the inside

I have plenty of friends in aussie, US and UK using lcd/sxrd projection tvs and they swear by the PQ and vfm of these babies Sony also has higher end lcd projection models which are based on SXRD technology and give 1080p and larger sizes (not sold in India yet) FYI mine is 1080i and has 1 hdmi input where i connect my ps3 for hd movies and games

EDIT - note that most dealers are not interested in selling these tvs as they don't make much given the low value, they'd rather make you buy a 1lac 40" lcd/plasma and make that extra buck. As a result they place this tv on the floor below the vertical viewing angle and this makes the PQ look bad compared to the lcds kept at eye level

Last edited by jassi : 17th October 2007 at 16:13.
jassi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2007, 19:23   #433 (permalink)
BHPian
 
ST7677's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 819
Default

No Projection TV was ruled out years ago. It just does not cut in.
The picture quality even today is way bad.

I would live with CRT as long as I can, (probably till one day when I stop all this analysis and make an impulse purchase )

Quote:
Originally Posted by black12rr
^^ But plasmas eat tons of power . I heard they consume as much as full loaded AC unit .
Googled an found out a 50 inch will consume 500 watts !
Plasma's do consume more power but not like full A/c!!!
A 42" plasma would consume about 350W, Compared to 180W for a 40" LCD.
So in a year, 4hours a day, will cost about 1k more electricity bill with plasma over LCD. Not really worth considering... is it?

Last edited by ST7677 : 17th October 2007 at 19:29.
ST7677 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2007, 20:36   #434 (permalink)
Team-BHP Support
 
Eddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Delhi
Posts: 2,184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ST7677 View Post
So in a year, 4hours a day, will cost about 1k more electricity bill with plasma over LCD. Not really worth considering... is it?
4 hrs eh ..... I am sure the kids are going to watch a lot more of Cartoon network than that
__________________
Car is no longer a luxury; parking space is.
Swift VDI(ABS) Sep 07 - 53K Kms
Ford Ikon Flair Sep 04 - 70K Kms
Eddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th October 2007, 12:28   #435 (permalink)
BHPian
 
ST7677's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 819
Default

Has anyone ever used / considered a Home theater projector?
Sony has one for 85k MRP, Just found this on Sony website...
Sony India : VPL-AW15 (VPLAW15) : Details

Please share Pros and Cons...
ST7677 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best Movies, Documentaries, games, etc to Showcase your hi-def plasma/lcd & HTS jassi Shifting gears 57 13th October 2009 20:06
LCD Display for Santro shashankre Ask the Gurus 15 26th June 2007 11:40
LED alloy wheels that can display virtually any image while you drive! Neo. Tyre & Alloy wheel Section 26 17th August 2006 16:12


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 01:39.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Team-BHP.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607