|
| |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #46 | |
| Distinguished - BHPian ![]() Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Weekdays@Chennai, Weekends@Kerala
Posts: 4,462
Thanked: 576 Times
| Quote:
| |
| |
| | #47 |
| Senior - BHPian Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Mumbai
Posts: 3,321
Thanked: 74 Times
| Problem is this rule has some exemptions. The judge that passed this order will cite security concerns and get exemptions from removing tints. If this rule applied to all, including politicians, celebrities and other officials in authority, then no judge would have passed this stupid order. |
| |
| | #48 |
| Senior - BHPian | The only fine I'm worried about is the Speeding one, 900 bucks is going to pinch. I don't commit the other offences so no problems for me there. Let's see how sternly this is implemented. Khaadu teri biwi paregi to bahut maaregi, sharam kar!!! |
| |
| | #49 |
| BANNED Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: same as the proposed venue for F1 ;-)
Posts: 1,155
Thanked: 3 Times
| |
| |
| | #50 |
| Senior - BHPian Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: cincinnati, jabalpur,chennai
Posts: 1,223
Thanked: 140 Times
| |
| |
| | #51 |
| BHPian Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: delhi
Posts: 107
Thanked: 2 Times
| About the bus drivers being 12th pass could somebosy tell me if all police personnel starting from a hawaldar are at least 12th pass. I understand its good if the drivers are educated but curios to know if Delhi police's house is in order before bringing somebody else's house in order. Also let me remind all of you that some(don't know how many) years ago there did not use to be a 10+2. I think it was just upto class 11th and then graduation. |
| |
| | #52 | |
| BHPian | Quote:
| |
| |
| | #53 |
| BHPian | Today's paper carries a half page Advert regarding the Rules that go into effect from today i.e. 9th April. The Advert mentions 2 links in bold Upon following the link, you'll realize that it doesn't lead to the specific Article or Order - it's just one further from the Home Page. And I quote form the website "Use of dark, black or reflective glasses in vehicles is not permitted as per law. As provided in Rule 100 of Central Motor Vehicle Rules 1989, the glass of windscreen and rear window of motor vehicles should have a visibility of at least 70% and that of side windows a minimum visibility of 50%. The specification of glass should conform to Indian Standards [ IS:2553 - Part 2 - 1992 ]. The front windscreen shall be of laminated safety glass, whose pieces do not fly in the event of a crash and edges would be less jagged than in case of ordinary glass." Frankly, this just validates my apprehension about Tabloids like the TOI. So, question arises - are articles just being written to scare the public or is there any substance in it? Because, if I recollect correctly - None of the official Traffic Police Adverts conclusively mention anything to the effect that indicates that even 70% visibility sun-film is not allowed. Perhaps someone can provide a scanned image of todays newspaper advert to clarify, I may be wrong. Last edited by manveet : 9th April 2007 at 12:42. |
| |
| | #54 |
| Senior - BHPian | Now i am all the more confused. Just removed my sun film today in the morning. Got late to office by 1 hour because of that. And i dont even live in Delhi. (Gurgaon). And now i see this (post 54). |
| |
| | #55 |
| Team-BHP Support ![]() | dceite, all tints have been banned. Reason "Equipment to check % is expensive". Same dumb logic was given when this was done in chandigarh. |
| |
| | #56 |
| BHPian Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: New Delhi
Posts: 107
Thanked: 4 Times
| So this mean that even in the case where there is 70% visibility & 50% visibility in rear & the side windows in the vehicle,one is likely to be challened?? I haven't removed the tint in my cars so far..Guess will wait & watch.. Can this order be challenged?? |
| |
| | #57 |
| BHPian | |
| |
| | #58 |
| BHPian | this is the link for the high court judgement. The link is given at the bottom of the Advertisement Last edited by rishibravo : 9th April 2007 at 13:33. |
| |
| | #59 |
| Senior - BHPian | Advt says order applicable to all vehicles plying in Delhi. Does that mean this rule is not applicable in Gurgaon/Noida/Fbad ? |
| |
| | #60 |
| Team-BHP Support ![]() | Of course not, but if you go to delhi, you will be challaned due to tints. |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Protest against Tata Motors.EDIT Supreme Court Orders Tata to repair Sumo (pg.40) | v1p3r | The Indian Car Scene | 713 | 19th January 2013 17:31 |
| Supreme Court bans tourism in core areas of Tiger reserves across the country | gauravdgr8 | Shifting gears | 26 | 17th October 2012 14:02 |
| Crashgate bans overturned by court | McLaren Rulez | Int'l Motorsport | 4 | 6th January 2010 20:15 |
| Supreme Court says bandhs are fine ! | maverick030581 | Shifting gears | 21 | 5th February 2009 00:48 |