| |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | |
| Distinguished - BHPian ![]() | I have been trying to use the data available in the "Buyer Guide" of automobile magazines on various small cars to arrive at some sort of qualitative ranking. This study will compare cars based on measurables like - 1) Outright Performance (0 - 100 kmph) 2) Driveability or In-Gear acceleration (30 - 80 kmph in 3rd Gear, 40 - 100 kmph in 4th Gear) 3) Mileage and cost per Km. 4) Initial Purchase price and depreciation (cost of ownership) 5) Safety features like airbags & ABS 6) Interior space, bootspace and legroom 7) Features that make our life easy - like climate control, electric mirrors etc. This compilation does not cover subjective aspects like - - Ride & handling - Design/Looks - After sales service - Maintenance costs This compilation of data also exludes cars with automatic transmission, LPG/CNG kits and also oddballs like Premier Rio/San Storm. I've excluded Reva for obvious reasons. Also, with the arrival of BSIV norms, some of the models mentioned in this list will go off the shelf. I have NOT separated petrol and diesel cars in this "study" - it is quite interesting to compare their engine performances. Part I - OUTRIGHT PERFORMANCE This is the most used and abused statistic that everybody uses to measure a car's performance. Although, one wonders if it is really that important. I don't exactly recall getting to 100 kmph from zero in 11 seconds in my car (Optra's supposed 0-100 timing) too many times. But anyway, here are the rankings - Fiat Palio 1.6 Petrol -------------- 11.9 secs Hyundai i20 1.4 Diesel ------------ 13 secs Hyundai i10 1.2 Petrol ------------ 13.02 secs Maruti Swift 1.2 Petrol ------------ 13.09 secs Honda Jazz 1.2 Petrol ------------- 13.29 secs Maruti Ritz 1.2 Petrol ------------- 13.33 secs Maruti A-Star 1.0 Petrol ----------- 13.79 secs Maruti Swift 1.3 Diesel ------------ 13.87 secs Maruti Ritz 1.3 Diesel --------------14.36 secs Hyundai Getz 1.3 Petrol ----------- 14.47 secs Hyundai Santro 1.1 Petrol --------- 14.66 secs Chevrolet Beat 1.2 Petrol ---------- 14.86 secs Skoda Fabia 1.4 Diesel ------------ 14.95 secs Hyundai i20 1.2 Petrol ------------ 15.21 secs Fiat Palio 1.3 Diesel -------------- 15.49 secs Hyundai i10 1.1 Petrol -------------15.55 secs Maruti Estilo 1.0 Petrol ------------ 15.83 secs Chevrolet Spark 1.0 Petrol --------- 15.93 secs Ford Figo `1.4 Diesel -------------- 16.26 secs Skoda Fabia 1.2 Petrol ------------ 16.26 secs Ford Figo 1.2 Petrol ----------------16.36 secs Tata Vista 1.3 Diesel ---------------16.36 secs Chevrolet U-VA 1.2 Petrol ----------16.49 secs VW Polo 1.2 Petrol -----------------16.5 secs Fiat Punto 1.4 Petrol ---------------16.58 secs Maruti WagonR 1.1 Petrol ---------- 16.6 secs Tata Indica 1.2 Petrol --------------16.95 secs Hyundai Getz 1.1 Petrol ------------ 17.7 secs Fiat Punto 1.3 Diesel --------------- 17.84 secs Fiat Punto 1.2 Petrol ----------------18.16 secs Tata Vista 1.2 Petrol -------------- 18.36 secs Maruti Alto 0.8 Petrol ---------------20.38 secs Fiat Palio 1.1 Petrol -----------------20.45 secs Tata Indica 1.4 Diesel ---------------22.39 secs Maruti 800 0.8 Petrol ----------------26 secs Tata Nano 0.6 Petrol --------------- 29.78 secs Inferences: - As expected, petrol cars rule the top 10 scene. - Good old Palio 1.6 is on top - but is it still on sale? - The second quickest small car is a diesel! - Nobody has ever talked about i10 as a performance car, but it is quicker than the Swift! - While the Marutis are mostly on the top, the bottom end of the table has been taken over by the Tatas and the Fiats. Not to worry though - the Tatas and the Fiats come back into the game in the next section - DRIVEABILITY. |
| | (6)
Thanks
|
| | |||
| Distinguished - BHPian ![]() | Quote:
1) Almost all small cars reach 60 kmph from zero in around 6 to 7 seconds. 2) There is almost no difference in ranking of the 0 - 60 cars from 0 - 100 cars. That is, a car that does a quick 0 - 100 does a quick 0 - 60 too. I think Fiat got rid of the old 1.2 Palio and replaced it with an anaemic 1.1 litre engine. From what I know, the new 1.2 FIRE engine powering Vista and Punto has not been placed in the Palio. Quote:
IndiCAB's are not powered by diesel engines, they are powered by dark forces of EVIL ![]() | ||
| |
| | |
| Distinguished - BHPian ![]() | Thanks daredevil! Part II - DRIVEABILITY (IN-GEAR ACCELERATION) I have been watching other people drive sitting in the passenger seat - and according to me, atleast 90% of the users are "lazy gear changers". That is, on a dual carriageway, 2nd gear is rarely ventured into. Even in a single lane state highway, the car stays in the 2nd gear for a very short time (because of the engine noise) - people tend to upshift pretty soon. That's why, to most users, driveability of a car is more important (and useful) than outright 0 - 100 kmph performance. Ranking of cars with the quickest 30 - 80 Kmph timings in the 3rd Gear: Tata Vista 1.3 Diesel -------------- 11.79 secs Fiat Palio 1.6 Petrol --------------- 11.9 secs Maruti Swift 1.3 Diesel ------------- 11.96 secs Maruti Ritz 1.3 Diesel -------------- 12.52 secs Fiat Punto 1.3 Diesel ---------------12.57 secs Fiat Palio 1.3 Diesel ---------------- 12.66 secs Hyundai Santro 1.1 Petrol ---------- 13.19 secs Skoda Fabia 1.2 Petrol ------------- 13.35 secs Ford Figo `1.4 Diesel --------------- 13.45 secs Skoda Fabia 1.4 Diesel ------------- 13.76 secs Fiat Punto 1.4 Petrol --------------- 14.11 secs Honda Jazz 1.2 Petrol ---------------14.26 secs Hyundai i10 1.1 Petrol -------------- 14.67 secs Maruti Ritz 1.2 Petrol --------------- 14.67 secs Maruti WagonR 1.1 Petrol ----------- 14.71 secs Maruti A-Star 1.0 Petrol ------------ 14.93 secs Maruti Swift 1.2 Petrol -------------- 14.98 secs Maruti Alto 0.8 Petrol --------------- 15 secs Hyundai Getz 1.3 Petrol ------------- 15.12 secs Chevrolet Spark 1.0 Petrol ---------- 15.19 secs Tata Indica 1.2 Petrol -------------- 15.25 secs Fiat Punto 1.2 Petrol ---------------- 15.27 secs Maruti 800 0.8 Petrol ---------------- 15.4 secs Maruti Estilo 1.0 Petrol -------------- 15.46 secs Hyundai i20 1.4 Diesel ---------------- 15.51 secs Hyundai i10 1.2 Petrol ---------------- 15.52 secs Chevrolet U-VA 1.2 Petrol ------------- 15.57 secs Chevrolet Beat 1.2 Petrol -------------- 15.99 secs Hyundai Getz 1.1 Petrol --------------- 16.31 secs VW Polo 1.2 Petrol -------------------- 16.83 secs Ford Figo 1.2 Petrol -------------------16.84 secs Hyundai i20 1.2 Petrol ---------------- 16.98 secs Tata Vista 1.2 Petrol ------------------ 17.91 secs Tata Indica 1.4 Diesel ------------------18 secs Fiat Palio 1.1 Petrol -------------------- 19.99 secs Tata Nano 0.6 Petrol ------------------- 20.45 secs Ranking of cars with the quickest 40 - 100 Kmph timings in the 4th Gear: Maruti Swift 1.3 Diesel --------------- 14.14 secs Tata Vista 1.3 Diesel ----------------14.87 secs Fiat Punto 1.3 Diesel ---------------- 15.22 secs Fiat Palio 1.3 Diesel ------------------ 15.26 secs Maruti Ritz 1.3 Diesel ----------------- 15.36 secs Ford Figo `1.4 Diesel ----------------- 16.36 secs Skoda Fabia 1.4 Diesel --------------- 16.49 secs Fiat Palio 1.6 Petrol -------------------18.7 secs Hyundai i20 1.4 Diesel -----------------19.01 secs Fiat Punto 1.4 Petrol ------------------ 19.53 secs Hyundai Santro 1.1 Petrol -------------- 20.04 secs Honda Jazz 1.2 Petrol------------------ 20.27 secs Hyundai i10 1.1 Petrol ----------------- 20.64 secs Skoda Fabia 1.2 Petrol ----------------- 21.17 secs Maruti A-Star 1.0 Petrol ---------------- 21.23 secs Hyundai Getz 1.3 Petrol ---------------- 21.26 secs Fiat Punto 1.2 Petrol ------------------- 21.72 secs Hyundai i20 1.2 Petrol ------------------ 22.23 secs Maruti Swift 1.2 Petrol ------------------ 22.41 secs Chevrolet Beat 1.2 Petrol --------------- 22.43 secs Chevrolet U-VA 1.2 Petrol --------------- 22.54 secs Maruti Estilo 1.0 Petrol ------------------ 22.93 secs Chevrolet Spark 1.0 Petrol --------------- 23.03 secs VW Polo 1.2 Petrol ---------------------- 23.04 secs Maruti Ritz 1.2 Petrol -------------------- 23.7 secs Maruti WagonR 1.1 Petrol --------------- 24.06 secs Tata Vista 1.2 Petrol -------------------- 24.48 secs Hyundai Getz 1.1 Petrol ----------------- 25.58 secs Tata Indica 1.2 Petrol ------------------- 25.6 secs Ford Figo 1.2 Petrol --------------------- 26.65 secs Tata Indica 1.4 Diesel ------------------- 29.7 secs Hyundai i10 1.2 Petrol ------------------- 29.92 secs Maruti 800 0.8 Petrol -------------------- 30.4 secs Maruti Alto 0.8 Petrol -------------------- 31 secs Fiat Palio 1.1 Petrol ---------------------- 34.19 secs Tata Nano 0.6 Petrol --------------------- 46.38 secs Assuming equal weightage for both 30 - 80 kph performance and 40 - 100 kph performance, the final driveability ranking of the cars (from top to bottom) - Tata Vista 1.3 Diesel Maruti Swift 1.3 Diesel Fiat Punto 1.3 Diesel Maruti Ritz 1.3 Diesel Fiat Palio 1.6 Petrol Fiat Palio 1.3 Diesel Ford Figo `1.4 Diesel Skoda Fabia 1.4 Diesel Hyundai Santro 1.1 Petrol Fiat Punto 1.4 Petrol Skoda Fabia 1.2 Petrol Honda Jazz 1.2 Petrol Hyundai i10 1.1 Petrol Maruti A-Star 1.0 Petrol Hyundai i20 1.4 Diesel Hyundai Getz 1.3 Petrol Maruti Swift 1.2 Petrol Maruti Ritz 1.2 Petrol Fiat Punto 1.2 Petrol Maruti WagonR 1.1 Petrol Chevrolet Spark 1.0 Petrol Maruti Estilo 1.0 Petrol Chevrolet U-VA 1.2 Petrol Chevrolet Beat 1.2 Petrol Tata Indica 1.2 Petrol Hyundai i20 1.2 Petrol Maruti Alto 0.8 Petrol VW Polo 1.2 Petrol Maruti 800 0.8 Petrol Hyundai Getz 1.1 Petrol Hyundai i10 1.2 Petrol Tata Vista 1.2 Petrol Ford Figo 1.2 Petrol Tata Indica 1.4 Diesel Fiat Palio 1.1 Petrol Tata Nano 0.6 Petrol Analysis: - As mentioned before, Tatas & Fiats come back into the game. It's quite obvious that the engine and transmission of Tatas & Fiats have been tuned for driveability rather than outright performance. - The Swift & Ritz diesel do quite well for itself on the driveability front too. They have the best of both worlds. - Petrols are nowhere to be seen (except for Palio 1.6). - Swift Diesel's 40 - 100 kmph time of 14 secs is beaten only by Skoda Laura 1.8 litre petrol engine. No other saloon petrol car gets close to Swift Diesel's 4th gear accelation. No wonder Swift diesel owners are so smug about their cars! ![]() - Hyundai i20 1.4 diesel and Hyundai i10 1.2 Petrol rankings, which did so well in outright performance category, simply fall of the cliff when it comes to driveability. |
| | (2)
Thanks
|
| | |
| Distinguished - BHPian ![]() | Thanks Sunil. Now I'm making a ranking of cars that perform well both on outright acceleration and driveability - to do this, I will be using a simple "point based system". Since there are 36 cars in the list, the car with the quickest outright acceleration gets 36 pts, the next one gets 35 pts (and so on) while the last one gets 1 pt. Ditto with driveability. Adding the two, the car with the highest points has the best combination of both outright performance and driveability. The methodology might be too simplistic and perhaps a bit flawed too, but it does give some idea about how the engines perform. Ranking of Cars with the best combination of in-gear acceleration and a quick 0 - 100 kmph time: Fiat Palio 1.6 Petrol --------------- 68 pts Maruti Swift 1.3 Diesel ------------ 64 pts Maruti Ritz 1.3 Diesel -------------- 61 pts Honda Jazz 1.2 Petrol ------------- 57 pts Hyundai i20 1.4 Diesel ------------- 55 pts Hyundai Santro 1.1 Petrol ---------- 54 pts Fiat Palio 1.3 Diesel ---------------- 54 pts Skoda Fabia 1.4 Diesel -------------- 53 pts Maruti Swift 1.2 Petrol ------------- 52 pts Maruti A-Star 1.0 Petrol ------------ 52 pts Tata Vista 1.3 Diesel ---------------- 51 pts Maruti Ritz 1.2 Petrol ---------------- 49 pts Ford Figo `1.4 Diesel ---------------- 48 pts Hyundai Getz 1.3 Petrol -------------- 47 pts Hyundai i10 1.1 Petrol ---------------- 45 pts Skoda Fabia 1.2 Petrol---------------- 43 pts Hyundai i10 1.2 Petrol ---------------- 42 pts Fiat Punto 1.3 Diesel ----------------- 41 pts Fiat Punto 1.4 Petrol ----------------- 39 pts Chevrolet Beat 1.2 Petrol -------------38 pts Hyundai i20 1.2 Petrol ----------------- 35 pts Chevrolet Spark 1.0 Petrol ------------- 35 pts Maruti Estilo 1.0 Petrol ----------------- 34 pts Maruti WagonR 1.1 Petrol -------------- 28 pts Chevrolet U-VA 1.2 Petrol -------------- 27 pts Fiat Punto 1.2 Petrol ------------------ 25 pts VW Polo 1.2 Petrol -------------------- 23 pts Ford Figo 1.2 Petrol -------------------- 23 pts Tata Indica 1.2 Petrol ------------------ 22 pts Hyundai Getz 1.1 Petrol -----------------18 pts Maruti Alto 0.8 Petrol --------------------16 pts Tata Vista 1.2 Petrol -------------------- 13 pts Maruti 800 0.8 Petrol -------------------- 11 pts Tata Indica 1.4 Diesel ------------------- 8 pts Fiat Palio 1.1 Petrol --------------------- 6 pts Tata Nano 0.6 Petrol -------------------- 2 pts Analysis: - If you look at the top 10 cars now, 5 are powered by petrol and 5 are powered by diesel. - Suprise entry by Hyundai Santro 1.1 petrol. Not exactly a scorcher in 0 - 100 kmph or in-gear acceleration, but performs decently well in both categories. Coming up next - the running costs. Tata Nano should redeem itself in this section. It would be interesting to see which cars offer the best balance between quick acceleration, driveability and low running costs. |
| | (1)
Thanks
|
| | |
| Distinguished - BHPian ![]() | akex, the stats are from Autocar India. I'm just doing some data mining. ![]() Part III - FUEL EFFICIENCY & RUNNING COSTS Most of these cars will be doing duty in the city limits, but it also doubles up a highway car. As expected, the diesels engines murder the petrols in this contest. Here is the mileage ranking of the 36 cars in our study - City Mileage: Maruti Ritz 1.3 Diesel ------------- 14.6 km/l Tata Nano 0.6 Petrol ------------- 14.5 km/l Maruti Swift 1.3 Diesel ------------ 14.4 km/l Ford Figo `1.4 Diesel ------------- 14.1 km/l Skoda Fabia 1.4 Diesel ------------ 14.1 km/l Hyundai i20 1.4 Diesel ------------- 13.8 km/l Fiat Punto 1.3 Diesel -------------- 13.7 km/l Tata Vista 1.3 Diesel -------------- 13.6 km/l Maruti Alto 0.8 Petrol -------------- 12.9 km/l Chevrolet Spark 1.0 Petrol ---------- 12.3 km/l Honda Jazz 1.2 Petrol -------------- 12.3 km/l Maruti Estilo 1.0 Petrol --------------12.3 km/l Tata Indica 1.4 Diesel -------------- 12.27 km/l Fiat Palio 1.3 Diesel ----------------- 12.2 km/l Maruti 800 0.8 Petrol ---------------- 12.2 km/l Hyundai Santro 1.1 Petrol ----------- 12.1 km/l Maruti A-Star 1.0 Petrol ------------- 12.1 km/l Hyundai i10 1.1 Petrol --------------- 12 km/l Maruti Swift 1.2 Petrol --------------- 11.9 km/l Maruti Ritz 1.2 Petrol ---------------- 11.8 km/l Hyundai i10 1.2 Petrol ----------------11.7 km/l Maruti WagonR 1.1 Petrol------------- 11.7 km/l Chevrolet Beat 1.2 Petrol -------------11.5 km/l Hyundai i20 1.2 Petrol ---------------- 11.2 km/l Ford Figo 1.2 Petrol ------------------ 10.9 km/l VW Polo 1.2 Petrol --------------------10.9 km/l Chevrolet U-VA 1.2 Petrol ------------- 10.6 km/l Tata Indica 1.2 Petrol -----------------10.5 km/l Hyundai Getz 1.3 Petrol --------------- 10.4 km/l Tata Vista 1.2 Petrol ------------------ 10.3 km/l Fiat Punto 1.4 Petrol ------------------ 10.2 km/l Fiat Palio 1.1 Petrol ------------------- 10.2 km/l Fiat Punto 1.2 Petrol ------------------- 9.7 km/l Skoda Fabia 1.2 Petrol ----------------- 9.7 km/l Hyundai Getz 1.1 Petrol ---------------- 9.3 km/l Fiat Palio 1.6 Petrol -------------------- 9.1 km/l Highway Mileage: Tata Nano 0.6 Petrol ------------------- 20.1 km/l Hyundai i20 1.4 Diesel ------------------ 19.5 km/l Maruti Ritz 1.3 Diesel-------------------- 19.3 km/l Maruti Swift 1.3 Diesel ------------------ 19.1 km/l Ford Figo `1.4 Diesel -------------------- 18.5 km/l Skoda Fabia 1.4 Diesel------------------ 18.5 km/l Fiat Punto 1.3 Diesel ------------------- 17.5 km/l Maruti 800 0.8 Petrol ------------------- 17.5 km/l Maruti Alto 0.8 Petrol-------------------- 17.5 km/l Maruti A-Star 1.0 Petrol ----------------- 17.1 km/l Maruti Swift 1.2 Petrol ------------------- 17 km/l Chevrolet Spark 1.0 Petrol --------------- 16.9 km/l Honda Jazz 1.2 Petrol ------------------- 16.9 km/ Maruti Estilo 1.0 Petrol ------------------- 16.8 km/l Maruti Ritz 1.2 Petrol -------------------- 16.7 km/l Tata Indica 1.4 Diesel ------------------- 16.6 km/l Hyundai i10 1.1 Petrol -------------------- 16.3 km/l Fiat Palio 1.3 Diesel ---------------------- 16.2 km/l Hyundai Santro 1.1 Petrol----------------- 16.2 km/l Maruti WagonR 1.1 Petrol ----------------- 16.2 km/l Hyundai i10 1.2 Petrol --------------------- 16 km/l Tata Vista 1.3 Diesel ---------------------- 15.7 km/l Hyundai i20 1.2 Petrol---------------------- 15.5 km/l Tata Vista 1.2 Petrol ---------------------- 15.5 km/l VW Polo 1.2 Petrol ------------------------ 15.5 km/l Ford Figo 1.2 Petrol ----------------------- 15.4 km/l Chevrolet Beat 1.2 Petrol ------------------- 15.3 km/l Skoda Fabia 1.2 Petrol --------------------- 15.2 km/l Chevrolet U-VA 1.2 Petrol------------------- 15 km/l Fiat Punto 1.2 Petrol ----------------------- 15 km/l Fiat Palio 1.1 Petrol ------------------------- 15 km/l Fiat Punto 1.4 Petrol ----------------------- 14.6 km/l Hyundai Getz 1.1 Petrol --------------------- 14.6 km/l Tata Indica 1.2 Petrol ---------------------- 14.5 km/l Hyundai Getz 1.3 Petrol---------------------- 14.4 km/l Fiat Palio 1.6 Petrol ------------------------ 14.1 km/l But because of the difference in petrol and diesel prices, the above comparison table doesn't make sense. What matters is the running cost - that is, the cost in rupees per Km. Assuming a 70% city and 30% highway run for each car, and a petrol price of Rs. 52 per litre and diesel price of Rs. 39 per litre, the ranking of running costs for each car would be something like this - Running costs: Maruti Ritz 1.3 Diesel ------------ Rs. 2.44/km Maruti Swift 1.3 Diesel----------- Rs. 2.47/km Hyundai i20 1.4 Diesel ----------- Rs. 2.51/km Ford Figo `1.4 Diesel ------------ Rs. 2.53/km Skoda Fabia 1.4 Diesel ---------- Rs. 2.53/km Fiat Punto 1.3 Diesel ------------ Rs. 2.63/km Tata Vista 1.3 Diesel ------------ Rs. 2.74/km Tata Indica 1.4 Diesel ----------- Rs. 2.87/km Fiat Palio 1.3 Diesel ------------- Rs. 2.91/km Tata Nano 0.6 Petrol ------------ Rs. 3.21/km Maruti Alto 0.8 Petrol ----------- Rs. 3.64/km Maruti 800 0.8 Petrol ------------ Rs. 3.77/km Chevrolet Spark 1.0 Petrol ------- Rs. 3.8/km Honda Jazz 1.2 Petrol ------------ Rs. 3.8/km Maruti Estilo 1.0 Petrol ----------- Rs. 3.81/km Maruti A-Star 1.0 Petrol ---------- Rs. 3.82/km Maruti Swift 1.2 Petrol ----------- Rs. 3.87/km Hyundai Santro 1.1 Petrol ---------Rs. 3.9/km Hyundai i10 1.1 Petrol ------------ Rs. 3.91/km Maruti Ritz 1.2 Petrol ------------- Rs. 3.92/km Maruti WagonR 1.1 Petrol --------- Rs. 3.98/km Hyundai i10 1.2 Petrol ------------ Rs. 4/km Chevrolet Beat 1.2 Petrol --------- Rs. 4.11/km Hyundai i20 1.2 Petrol ------------ Rs. 4.16/km VW Polo 1.2 Petrol -------------- Rs. 4.23/km Ford Figo 1.2 Petrol -------------- Rs. 4.24/km Chevrolet U-VA 1.2 Petrol -------- Rs. 4.36/km Tata Vista 1.2 Petrol ------------- Rs. 4.38/km Tata Indica 1.2 Petrol------------ Rs. 4.44/km Fiat Palio 1.1 Petrol -------------- Rs. 4.47/km Hyundai Getz 1.3 Petrol ---------- Rs. 4.48/km Fiat Punto 1.4 Petrol ------------- Rs. 4.51/km Skoda Fabia 1.2 Petrol ----------- Rs. 4.58/km Fiat Punto 1.2 Petrol ------------- Rs. 4.61/km Hyundai Getz 1.1 Petrol ---------- Rs. 4.78/km Fiat Palio 1.6 Petrol -------------- Rs. 4.91/km |
| | (1)
Thanks
|
| | ||
| BHPian | Quote:
Couple of points from myside; >> The withdrawn 1.6 GTX is still into comparison, however, Swift with 1.3 G13B block is not here. I am saying this because, manufacturer listed timings for a 0-100 km sprint is 12.9 secs. This can become the second best had you included in your analysis. >> The Other point is, being an i10 owner i appreciate your statement that i10 is quite fast. But unfortunatley in real world conditions all its power is going waste. Reason: Tall boy design, body roll, poor handling very bumpy suspension and last but not the least scary dynamics. Had Hyundai had got a better chasis with low CoG that aids better cornering and a slightly stiff suspension i10 would have made a mark in performance hatches in India. Last edited by Mi10 : 3rd May 2010 at 13:00. | |
| |
| | ||||
| Distinguished - BHPian ![]() | Quote:
So basically, if you had owned a Honda Jazz (for eg), your city mileage would have been more than 12.3 km/l - and hence the ranking of the cars wouldn't have changed . Quote:
Quote:
| |||
| |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Diesel Hatchback Ready Reckoner (Price, Specs, Features etc.) | jessie007 | The Indian Car Scene | 16 | 27th February 2013 11:18 |
| Kanha Ready Reckoner- Read before planning Kanha trip | kunalsb | Travelogues | 12 | 8th June 2011 18:37 |
| Prospective Car buyer's search- Bought a car that was not in contention at all! | himanshugoswami | Sedans | 38 | 9th April 2009 16:58 |
| Cars in India-a buyer's guide | vnabhi | What Car? | 6 | 28th June 2008 22:57 |
| A true dud according to BSM 2006 car buyer's guide | Samurai | The Indian Car Scene | 71 | 11th January 2006 21:45 |