| || ||Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|18th September 2010, 16:24||#1|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Thanked: 206 Times
Misleading Tata website!!!
I noticed this in the Vista website.
Is it deliberately done to fool the prospective customers?
Even kids (TBHP) know Ritz never came with 68 bhp engine.
It's hard to believe nobody at Tata noticed this!!!
|18th September 2010, 17:30||#2|
Senior - BHPian
Join Date: Nov 2009
Thanked: 172 Times
I could'nt believe that just for the sake of their product, a company could do this. It should be acted upon as a crime. Maruti India should file case against them for distructing image of their brand.:(
|18th September 2010, 17:45||#3|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Quilon/ Sharjah
Thanked: 5 Times
Must have been a typing mistake or maybe the no-petrolhead website designer thought that the Ritz was a just better looking WagonR. But still such mistakes should have been rectified before launching the website.
If you analyze the data provided it is beyond doubt that the Vista is least powerful vehicle in the category, even the 1.0L Suzuki engine gives more power. So, I couldn't help but wonder, what exactly is TATA trying to accomplish with an engine comparison chart.
Last edited by harishnair : 18th September 2010 at 17:46.
|18th September 2010, 18:14||#4|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Thanked: 382 Times
Good spotting. I don't think it was deliberate, especially since the conclusion doesn't boast about class leading power or torque. It says that the Vista has 'adequate power for city and highway use', which is sort of true, and that it has 'adequate torque at low rpm', which it does. It seems like a mistake, nothing more. I hope you did contact tata and inform them of this, Skyline GT-R
|18th September 2010, 18:37||#5|
Distinguished - BHPian
Join Date: Sep 2009
Thanked: 6,569 Times
Even I dont think it was deliberate. All these could lead to legal issues and no company would want to spend time sorting out the issues + all that negative marketing!
Now one reason it could have happened is by typo [interchanging the numbers] ?? 86 could have become 68 ? I read in Ritz website that K10 engine is 85 ps ! so this could have been a mistake happened like this. Anyway good finding GTR !
|18th September 2010, 18:59||#6|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Coimbatore / Bangalore / New York
Thanked: 13 Times
I hope this is not deliberate. In my experience building/browsing auto websites, vehicle comparison data is normally provided by 3rd party vendors. But this particular page (Surprise Yourself.........Features) is a static html and it is possible someone typed/copy pasted the information.
But then these kind of mistakes would be covered under the terms and conditions. Nevertheless it makes sense for TML to rectify this mistake. I have notified them about this page. Hope they would listen
Here is the contact us page link - Tata Cars | Contact us
|22nd September 2010, 11:28||#8|
Join Date: May 2009
Thanked: 257 Times
They had this printed on brochures too. I had brought it to the notice of the sales guy but as expected : he did not have a clue what I was talking about. He hadn't seen a Ritz in his life : forget knowing it's engine specs !!
|22nd September 2010, 18:48||#11|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Thanked: 58 Times
@ Harish: I completely agree. I guess the tag line Surprise Yourself has a hidden meaning in this comparison chart! They should have compared interior specs instead.
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|How BHP, Torque and power-to-weight ratios can be misleading||VeyronSuperSprt||Technical Stuff||16||19th April 2016 07:25|
|Misleading car/bike ads.||pgsagar||The Indian Car Scene||67||19th April 2015 13:25|
|"Handling" - the most ambiguous/misleading term||rajushank84||Technical Stuff||23||15th September 2010 00:19|
|Mercedes/dealer to compensate for misleading consumer||DriverR||The Indian Car Scene||1||3rd March 2009 16:13|
|The hidden/misleading truth behind BMW LOGO???||CrAzY dRiVeR||The International Automotive Scene||9||19th May 2008 19:37|