Go Back   Team-BHP > Under the Hood > Modifications & Accessories

Modifications & Accessories Engine swaps, forced induction, tyre upgrades, free flowing exhausts....its all in here!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 14th February 2007, 11:08   #16 (permalink)
Senior - BHPian
 
shuvc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kolkata
Posts: 1,723
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by manveet View Post
I disagree.

Wider tires will obviously have a greater area of contact.
Actually not - the tyre bible has a nice example ...

Car Bibles : The Wheel and Tyre Bible

If there's one question guaranteed to promote argument and counter argument, it's this : do wide tyres give me better grip?
Fat tyres look good. In fact they look stonkingly good. In the dry they are mercilessly full of grip. In the wet, you might want to make sure your insurance is paid up, especially if you're in a rear-wheel-drive car. Contrary to what you might think (and to what I used to think), bigger contact patch does not necessarily mean increased grip. Better yet, fatter tyres do not mean bigger contact patch. Confused? Check it out:

Pressure=weight/area.

That's about as simple a physics equation as you can get. For the general case of most car tyres travelling on a road, it works pretty well. Let me explain. Let's say you've got some regular tyres, as supplied with your car. They're inflated to 30psi and your car weighs 1500Kg. Roughly speaking, each tyre is taking about a quarter of your car's weight - in this case 375Kg. In metric, 30psi is about 2.11Kg/cm².
By that formula, the area of your contact patch is going to be roughly 375 / 2.11 = 177.7cm² (weight divided by pressure)
Let's say your standard tyres are 185/65R14 - a good middle-ground, factory-fit tyre. That means the tread width is 18.5cm side to side. So your contact patch with all these variables is going to be about 177.7cm² / 18.5, which is 9.8cm. Your contact patch is a rectangle 18.5cm across the width of the tyre by 9.8cm front-to-back where it sits 'flat' on the road.
Still with me? Great. You've taken your car to the tyre dealer and with the help of my tyre calculator, figured out that you can get some swanky 225/50R15 tyres. You polish up the 15inch rims, get the tyres fitted and drive off. Let's look at the equation again. The weight of your car bearing down on the wheels hasn't changed. The PSI in the tyres is going to be about the same. If those two variables haven't changed, then your contact patch is still going to be the same : 177.7cm²
However you now have wider tyres - the tread width is now 22.5cm instead of 18.5cm. The same contact patch but with wider tyres means a narrower contact area front-to-back. In this example, it becomes 177.7cm² / 22.5, which is 7.8cm.
Imagine driving on to a glass road and looking up underneath your tyres. This is the example contact patch (in red) for the situation I explained above. The narrower tyre has a longer, thinner contact patch. The fatter tyre has a shorter, wider contact patch, but the area is the same on both. And there is your 'eureka' moment. Overall, the area of your contact patch has remained more or less the same. But by putting wider tyres on, the shape of the contact patch has changed. Actually, the contact patch is really a squashed oval rather than a rectangle, but for the sake of simplicity on this site, I've illustrated it as a rectangle - it makes the concept a little easier to understand. So has the penny dropped? I'll assume it has. So now you understand that it makes no difference to the contact patch, this leads us on nicely to the sticky topic of grip.
The area of the contact patch does not affect the actual grip of the tyre. The things that do affect grip are the coefficient of friction and the load on the tyre - tyre load sensitivity.
__________________
PIGZILNKILJBSCOMB
shuvc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2007, 11:36   #17 (permalink)
BHPian
 
manveet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shuvc View Post
The weight of your car bearing down on the wheels hasn't changed. The PSI in the tyres is going to be about the same. If those two variables haven't changed, then your contact patch is still going to be the same
But why are we keeping the psi same, isn't that an assumption ??

What happens in case I reduce the psi because I am upsizing?
__________________
Ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac?
manveet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2007, 11:39   #18 (permalink)
Senior - BHPian
 
shuvc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kolkata
Posts: 1,723
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by manveet View Post
But why are we keeping the psi same, isn't that an assumption ??

What happens in case I reduce the psi because I am upsizing?
Well, you could increase the contact area by reducing psi on your existing tyres as well .
The concept is that just having wider tyres does not necessarily ensure more contact area. You could even have less if you inflated them with a much higher psi.
__________________
PIGZILNKILJBSCOMB

Last edited by shuvc : 14th February 2007 at 11:40.
shuvc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2007, 13:53   #19 (permalink)
BHPian
 
manveet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shuvc View Post
The concept is that just having wider tyres does not necessarily ensure more contact area. You could even have less if you inflated them with a much higher psi.
Got it the first time around dude. I've had my "eureka" moment like the writer said

Quote:
Originally Posted by shuvc
Well, you could increase the contact area by reducing psi on your existing tyres as well .
Contrary to what it may appear, I was NOT trying to argue for the sake of doing so. Where I was coming from is that when we upsize our Tires, don't the OE recommendations get invalidated and we are thus supposed to reduce the psi.

I believe that the OEM does a lot of research to come with appropriate psi figures - I realized this a couple of years back while getting air filled in an Accord - Honda has recommended a different psi for EACH of the tires - varying from 28-33.

This may be OT, but I'd really appreciate if anyone could advice if there a scientific method that tells us by how much the psi should change based on the changes we make to tire sizes? Ishan, you there ??
__________________
Ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac?

Last edited by manveet : 14th February 2007 at 13:56.
manveet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2007, 16:16   #20 (permalink)
Senior - BHPian
 
shuvc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kolkata
Posts: 1,723
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by manveet View Post
don't the OE recommendations get invalidated and we are thus supposed to reduce the psi.
Come to think of it, should we not increase the psi for wider tyres, to maintain the same contact area ? I mean, the width is anyway increasing, so we've got to reduce the length which should be possible by increasing psi ? When I changed from 185/65 to 195/60, the tyre shop pumped in 30psi. The recommendation for the OEMs was 25-29.

Quote:
I believe that the OEM does a lot of research to come with appropriate psi figures - I realized this a couple of years back while getting air filled in an Accord - Honda has recommended a different psi for EACH of the tires - varying from 28-33.
.. do Accord owners on the forum follow this ?

Quote:
This may be OT, but I'd really appreciate if anyone could advice if there a scientific method that tells us by how much the psi should change based on the changes we make to tire sizes? Ishan, you there ??
It should be possible to calculate based on the car bible formulae. We can probably assume a weight for the vehicle and back-calculate.

Btw, OT, does Ishan really have something to do with tyres ? I recall a vehement denial in his signature sometime ago. Must say am not aware why he did so.
__________________
PIGZILNKILJBSCOMB

Last edited by shuvc : 14th February 2007 at 16:17.
shuvc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2007, 19:53   #21 (permalink)
Distinguished - BHPian
 
iraghava's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bhaiyyaland
Posts: 7,756
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by manveet View Post
Ishan, you there ??
Yes and I shall respond to this later. Am a bit tied up right now.

Quote:
Originally Posted by shuvc View Post
Btw, OT, does Ishan really have something to do with tyres ? I recall a vehement denial in his signature sometime ago. Must say am not aware why he did so.
No Shuvc I do not have anything to do with tyres apart from being a user & enthusiast. I've always had a fascination with tyres, no idea why though! There has been an impression amongst some people on the forum that I'm a tyre dealer since I have a little bit of knowledge about tyres and I was actually asked this question when a member from down south specifically called me upto clear this doubt, so just for fun I had put on a signature denying that!!

So now you know the truth & the reason behind the signature
__________________
There is a very fine line between "Hobby" and "Mental Illness".
iraghava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2007, 20:49   #22 (permalink)
BHPian
 
manveet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iraghava View Post
Yes and I shall respond to this later. Am a bit tied up right now.
Thats ok. The statement was made in jest.
__________________
Ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac?
manveet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2007, 21:17   #23 (permalink)
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Shan2nu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hubli - Karnataka - India
Posts: 4,166
Default

What you guys aren't cosidering is the lower profile of the wider tyre. As the profile reduces, the tyre lowers it's chances of the sidewall flexing under hard braking, this makes sure that the wider (lower profile) tyre retains a larger percentage of it's contact patch when subjected to braking forces.

When rolling, the diff in contact path maynot be much but from my point of view, this is a good thing as it doesn't affect the rolling resistance of the tyre.

C'mon guys, do you really expect a 165/80 R13 tyre to provide as much traction as a 205/50 R15 (on the same car with the same tyre pressure)? It's just not possible!!!

Shan2nu
__________________
VTEC flyby - youtube.com/watch?v=1AhWJlVRPqE
Shan2nu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th February 2007, 06:11   #24 (permalink)
Senior - BHPian
 
mithun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cochin/Bangalore
Posts: 1,119
Default

Let's assume for a moment that we're testing the brakes in a laboratory, where we can just consider coefficients of friction and normal forces. For two identical cars, the normal force (or vehicle weight) is the same, so this is a non-factor in affecting the braking distances. That leaves only the coefficient of friction. If we assume that the two tyres are constructed of the same material, then they should have the same friction coefficient, right? Well, yes, except that the wider tyre has more surface area than the narrower one. I'm talking about the "circumferential" area around the outside of the tyre. This is given as Pi x Diameter x Width. Pi and Diameter are constant, but the Width's are not, by definition, the same. Therefore the wider tyre has more surface area.

Why is this important? Well, it turns out that the coefficient of friction of rubber on asphalt is dependent upon temperature (actually, it's usually measured as a function of sliding velocity, but it ultimately is a function of the heat generated at the sliding interface). In our case, during threshold braking, we get instantaneous, "micro" sliding action between the rubber and the road. This causes heat to build up, which drops the coefficient of friction. A wider tyre, having more surface area, can more easily dissipate this heat energy than a narrower tyre.

So in a nutshell, wider tyres can improve the braking distance BUT remember that this is co-dependent on many other factors.
__________________
Hold fast to dreams, for if dreams dry, life is a broken-winged bird that cannot fly.
mithun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2007, 08:48   #25 (permalink)
BHPian
 
desigNation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: calicut
Posts: 401
Default

kpzen-whats your opinion about dunlop sp9000,205/50/r15?using right now on my baleno.
__________________
The "drive" must go on!!!
desigNation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2007, 10:04   #26 (permalink)
BHPian
 
sreenivass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 745
Default

The stock rims for accent viva are 5J steel. You can not go beyond 185 width on these rims unless you plan to change them. A 185/60 may reduce your ground clearance. 185/65 seems to be a better bet for you, the speedo error and reduction in ground clearance are minimal. Bridgestone site shows 185/65R13 in B650.
sreenivass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2007, 12:35   #27 (permalink)
Senior - BHPian
 
kpzen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Greater Noida
Posts: 3,387
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by desigNation View Post
kpzen-whats your opinion about dunlop sp9000,205/50/r15?using right now on my baleno.
No personal experience of Dunlop SP9000 but the thread pattern is amazing......
__________________
Prajesh

ECLIPSEd
kpzen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Will fitting wider tires result in loss of FE?Or is it... undead Tyre & Alloy wheel Section 2 20th July 2008 10:33
So many options to increase power, what about braking? fiery enzyme Modifications & Accessories 37 24th June 2008 12:06
Stock rims for wider tyres? i_m_anaconda Tyre & Alloy wheel Section 1 19th April 2008 13:57
Swift Vxi : Wider Tires At The Rear D1ISTHE1 Tyre & Alloy wheel Section 3 3rd November 2007 00:00
Do wider tyres affect FE ?? mike3d Tyre & Alloy wheel Section 17 6th January 2006 22:51


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 05:08.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Team-BHP.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461