| |||||||
| Register | BHP Garage | Classifieds | Team-BHP FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Modifications & Accessories Engine swaps, forced induction, tyre upgrades, free flowing exhausts....its all in here! |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #16 (permalink) | |
| Senior - BHPian | Quote:
Car Bibles : The Wheel and Tyre Bible If there's one question guaranteed to promote argument and counter argument, it's this : do wide tyres give me better grip? Fat tyres look good. In fact they look stonkingly good. In the dry they are mercilessly full of grip. In the wet, you might want to make sure your insurance is paid up, especially if you're in a rear-wheel-drive car. Contrary to what you might think (and to what I used to think), bigger contact patch does not necessarily mean increased grip. Better yet, fatter tyres do not mean bigger contact patch. Confused? Check it out: Pressure=weight/area. That's about as simple a physics equation as you can get. For the general case of most car tyres travelling on a road, it works pretty well. Let me explain. Let's say you've got some regular tyres, as supplied with your car. They're inflated to 30psi and your car weighs 1500Kg. Roughly speaking, each tyre is taking about a quarter of your car's weight - in this case 375Kg. In metric, 30psi is about 2.11Kg/cm². By that formula, the area of your contact patch is going to be roughly 375 / 2.11 = 177.7cm² (weight divided by pressure) Let's say your standard tyres are 185/65R14 - a good middle-ground, factory-fit tyre. That means the tread width is 18.5cm side to side. So your contact patch with all these variables is going to be about 177.7cm² / 18.5, which is 9.8cm. Your contact patch is a rectangle 18.5cm across the width of the tyre by 9.8cm front-to-back where it sits 'flat' on the road. Still with me? Great. You've taken your car to the tyre dealer and with the help of my tyre calculator, figured out that you can get some swanky 225/50R15 tyres. You polish up the 15inch rims, get the tyres fitted and drive off. Let's look at the equation again. The weight of your car bearing down on the wheels hasn't changed. The PSI in the tyres is going to be about the same. If those two variables haven't changed, then your contact patch is still going to be the same : 177.7cm² However you now have wider tyres - the tread width is now 22.5cm instead of 18.5cm. The same contact patch but with wider tyres means a narrower contact area front-to-back. In this example, it becomes 177.7cm² / 22.5, which is 7.8cm. Imagine driving on to a glass road and looking up underneath your tyres. This is the example contact patch (in red) for the situation I explained above. The narrower tyre has a longer, thinner contact patch. The fatter tyre has a shorter, wider contact patch, but the area is the same on both. And there is your 'eureka' moment. Overall, the area of your contact patch has remained more or less the same. But by putting wider tyres on, the shape of the contact patch has changed. Actually, the contact patch is really a squashed oval rather than a rectangle, but for the sake of simplicity on this site, I've illustrated it as a rectangle - it makes the concept a little easier to understand. So has the penny dropped? I'll assume it has. So now you understand that it makes no difference to the contact patch, this leads us on nicely to the sticky topic of grip. The area of the contact patch does not affect the actual grip of the tyre. The things that do affect grip are the coefficient of friction and the load on the tyre - tyre load sensitivity.
__________________ PIGZILNKILJBSCOMB | |
| | |
| | #17 (permalink) | |
| BHPian | Quote:
What happens in case I reduce the psi because I am upsizing?
__________________ Ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? | |
| | |
| | #18 (permalink) | |
| Senior - BHPian | Quote:
.The concept is that just having wider tyres does not necessarily ensure more contact area. You could even have less if you inflated them with a much higher psi.
__________________ PIGZILNKILJBSCOMB Last edited by shuvc : 14th February 2007 at 11:40. | |
| | |
| | #19 (permalink) | ||
| BHPian | Quote:
![]() Quote:
I believe that the OEM does a lot of research to come with appropriate psi figures - I realized this a couple of years back while getting air filled in an Accord - Honda has recommended a different psi for EACH of the tires - varying from 28-33. This may be OT, but I'd really appreciate if anyone could advice if there a scientific method that tells us by how much the psi should change based on the changes we make to tire sizes? Ishan, you there ??
__________________ Ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? Last edited by manveet : 14th February 2007 at 13:56. | ||
| | |
| | #20 (permalink) | |||
| Senior - BHPian | Quote:
Quote:
.. do Accord owners on the forum follow this ?Quote:
Btw, OT, does Ishan really have something to do with tyres ? I recall a vehement denial in his signature sometime ago. Must say am not aware why he did so.
__________________ PIGZILNKILJBSCOMB Last edited by shuvc : 14th February 2007 at 16:17. | |||
| | |
| | #21 (permalink) | |
| Distinguished - BHPian ![]() | Yes and I shall respond to this later. Am a bit tied up right now. Quote:
So now you know the truth & the reason behind the signature ![]()
__________________ There is a very fine line between "Hobby" and "Mental Illness". | |
| | |
| | #23 (permalink) |
| Distinguished - BHPian ![]() | What you guys aren't cosidering is the lower profile of the wider tyre. As the profile reduces, the tyre lowers it's chances of the sidewall flexing under hard braking, this makes sure that the wider (lower profile) tyre retains a larger percentage of it's contact patch when subjected to braking forces. When rolling, the diff in contact path maynot be much but from my point of view, this is a good thing as it doesn't affect the rolling resistance of the tyre. C'mon guys, do you really expect a 165/80 R13 tyre to provide as much traction as a 205/50 R15 (on the same car with the same tyre pressure)? It's just not possible!!! Shan2nu
__________________ VTEC flyby - youtube.com/watch?v=1AhWJlVRPqE |
| | |
| | #24 (permalink) |
| Senior - BHPian | Let's assume for a moment that we're testing the brakes in a laboratory, where we can just consider coefficients of friction and normal forces. For two identical cars, the normal force (or vehicle weight) is the same, so this is a non-factor in affecting the braking distances. That leaves only the coefficient of friction. If we assume that the two tyres are constructed of the same material, then they should have the same friction coefficient, right? Well, yes, except that the wider tyre has more surface area than the narrower one. I'm talking about the "circumferential" area around the outside of the tyre. This is given as Pi x Diameter x Width. Pi and Diameter are constant, but the Width's are not, by definition, the same. Therefore the wider tyre has more surface area. Why is this important? Well, it turns out that the coefficient of friction of rubber on asphalt is dependent upon temperature (actually, it's usually measured as a function of sliding velocity, but it ultimately is a function of the heat generated at the sliding interface). In our case, during threshold braking, we get instantaneous, "micro" sliding action between the rubber and the road. This causes heat to build up, which drops the coefficient of friction. A wider tyre, having more surface area, can more easily dissipate this heat energy than a narrower tyre. So in a nutshell, wider tyres can improve the braking distance BUT remember that this is co-dependent on many other factors.
__________________ Hold fast to dreams, for if dreams dry, life is a broken-winged bird that cannot fly. |
| | |
| | #26 (permalink) |
| BHPian | The stock rims for accent viva are 5J steel. You can not go beyond 185 width on these rims unless you plan to change them. A 185/60 may reduce your ground clearance. 185/65 seems to be a better bet for you, the speedo error and reduction in ground clearance are minimal. Bridgestone site shows 185/65R13 in B650. |
| | |
![]() |
« Which K&N?
|
Modded Getz »
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Will fitting wider tires result in loss of FE?Or is it... | undead | Tyre & Alloy wheel Section | 2 | 20th July 2008 10:33 |
| So many options to increase power, what about braking? | fiery enzyme | Modifications & Accessories | 37 | 24th June 2008 12:06 |
| Stock rims for wider tyres? | i_m_anaconda | Tyre & Alloy wheel Section | 1 | 19th April 2008 13:57 |
| Swift Vxi : Wider Tires At The Rear | D1ISTHE1 | Tyre & Alloy wheel Section | 3 | 3rd November 2007 00:00 |
| Do wider tyres affect FE ?? | mike3d | Tyre & Alloy wheel Section | 17 | 6th January 2006 22:51 |
All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 05:08.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461





Imagine driving on to a glass road and looking up underneath your tyres. This is the example contact patch (in red) for the situation I explained above. The narrower tyre has a longer, thinner contact patch. The fatter tyre has a shorter, wider contact patch, but the area is the same on both. And there is your 'eureka' moment. Overall, the area of your contact patch has remained more or less the same. But by putting wider tyres on, the shape of the contact patch has changed. Actually, the contact patch is really a squashed oval rather than a rectangle, but for the sake of simplicity on this site, I've illustrated it as a rectangle - it makes the concept a little easier to understand. So has the penny dropped? I'll assume it has. So now you understand that it makes no difference to the contact patch, this leads us on nicely to the sticky topic of grip. 
.
.. do Accord owners on the forum follow this ?

