Go Back   Team-BHP > Around the Corner > Motorbikes

Motorbikes Everything related to the two-wheeled breed.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 27th February 2008, 02:44   #16 (permalink)
BHPian
 
gendarmee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 518
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by hollywoodhogan View Post
is it? not quite my dear.

seriously, breeze or not the leading link suspension is outdated and of that there is no doubt.
Even the internal combustion engine is out dated, same bore and same piston!?!

The kind of suspension depends more on the design, one can also cry about bikes having 2 shocks for the rear & that mono shocks do better, the same way one can cry about a gear less scooter having only one shock in the rear while bikes & blaze have 2 shocks.
IMO, Nothing is out dated as long as it does the job well.
Get the bushes changed if they are worn out, and it does well.

__________________
FIAT!
gendarmee is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27th February 2008, 16:39   #17 (permalink)
BHPian
 
ravi@64bhp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 463
Default

Just test rode the much-talked Aviator.

Looks:
Lookwise I did not like it at all, may be it will take more time for me to accostom to the new look. The scooter looks a bit bigger in size. I am 5'8" and not able to put my legs completely on the ground sitting astride (I was able to do that but not comfortably). The front rim size is bigger (12 inch), but the rear wheel size remains 10 inches. The scooter looks a bit huge, and rear look elevates the tiny tyre size.

Engine:
Same old 102cc engine, same pickup, same smoothness. NOt much to say. The bike really needs a bigger heart. I am really disappointed in this aspect.

Handling and Breaking:
The bigger front wheel, telescopic front suspension, and disc brake definitely helped in good breaking. Handling and maneurability are good, but not as Flyte. I could not test on potholed road to check the suspension capabilty.

The bike is available on the spot for Rs. 49000 OTR (disc brake version) and all colors are available (JSP honda, kukatpally, hyderabad).
__________________
'03 HH Splendor - 28,000km
'06 Kinetic Blaze - 10,700km
'07 Kinetic Flyte - 8500km
'06 HH Zma - 35,000km
'07 WagonR Lxi - 31,800km
ravi@64bhp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th February 2008, 18:30   #18 (permalink)
BHPian
 
gendarmee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 518
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by ravi@64bhp View Post
Just test rode the much-talked Aviator.


The bike is available on the spot for Rs. 49000 OTR (disc brake version) and all colors are available (JSP honda, kukatpally, hyderabad).

What? the narayanguda Honda guy, where i took the activa said that the aviator will take time to come last week.
I'll check it out tomm again.
I agree with the styling part, it more like scooterette, activa with a face lift.
__________________
FIAT!
gendarmee is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 6th March 2008, 21:34   #19 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: bangalore
Posts: 300
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gendarmee View Post
Even the internal combustion engine is out dated, same bore and same piston!?!

The kind of suspension depends more on the design, one can also cry about bikes having 2 shocks for the rear & that mono shocks do better, the same way one can cry about a gear less scooter having only one shock in the rear while bikes & blaze have 2 shocks.
IMO, Nothing is out dated as long as it does the job well.
Get the bushes changed if they are worn out, and it does well.
perhaps yes but just one point, hold the front brake and try to push dowm on a leading link suspension. there will be no action whereas in the telescopic type the suspension will act even with the front brake held tight. so basically whilst riding and during braking on broken roads the leading link will harden up and not act but shudder and thud. besides the leading link suspension has been abandoned my all manufacturers except in cases where cost is a factor.

the aviator sports a telescopic suspension.
__________________
life is a beach....enjoy it!

surYa
hollywoodhogan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2008, 06:50   #20 (permalink)
BHPian
 
ravi@64bhp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 463
Default

Yesterday, I stopped a guy who is riding this Avaiator in the traffic, and asked how he felt. He said, the handling and suspension were tooo good compared to the activa and dio. He previously rode an Activa.

There is a review at Motorcyclist At Large of Aviator, and he claimed the handling and breaking is superb compared to Flyte and Access.
__________________
'03 HH Splendor - 28,000km
'06 Kinetic Blaze - 10,700km
'07 Kinetic Flyte - 8500km
'06 HH Zma - 35,000km
'07 WagonR Lxi - 31,800km
ravi@64bhp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2008, 11:53   #21 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Visakhapatnam
Posts: 44
Default

If the Aviator is going for allmost 50k, isn't it a bit too near the blaze bracket? They should get it down to atleast 45k.
chvvkumar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2008, 16:23   #22 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 109
Default

for the disk brake version braking is better but thats very expensive version..
motorcyclist hasnt said handling is better than flyte/access.. hes talking @ the front telescopic forks
sunilbakshi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th March 2008, 12:45   #23 (permalink)
BHPian
 
vasanthn21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 51
Default

Are the disc brakes in Aviator really good?

The reason I am asking is - I have heard many stories about disc brakes (I do not have first hand experience, just have heard, so correct me if I am wrong!)

I have heard about people skidding and falling when they apply the disc brakes accidentally on wet roads and the rear brakes are pressed a little late. I heard about this in bikes like Pulsar!

Thought I am a staunch Honda fan, one of the things I do not like about Activa is its road grip on wet roads. I have experienced and seen many Honda riders (both Activa and Dio) skidding and falling on wet roads, even when the vehicle is inclined a little bit, and the brakes are used! I personally feel the road grip was better in Kinetic.

So, are the tires in Aviator capable of handling the vehicle when disc brakes are applied? I believe Honda engineers have more brains than me, and they would have tested this, but I want to get the opinion of people who have driven it (preferably on wet roads or on gravel!)
vasanthn21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th March 2008, 20:49   #24 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Visakhapatnam
Posts: 44
Default

Grip on wet roads is an issue on the scooters. As for the disc brakes, its very simple physics. Basically, the front wheel acts acts as a guide/rudder for your vehicle. So, even if the rear wheel looses traction, you can still manage but if you loose grip on the front, I bet even the best will fall. So the moral of the story is: NEVER use the front brake hardly when its slippery (rain, water, oil, sand etc.). Use the front:back brakes in for example, 75:25 ratio.
chvvkumar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th March 2008, 22:28   #25 (permalink)
BHPian
 
gendarmee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 518
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hollywoodhogan View Post
perhaps yes but just one point, hold the front brake and try to push dowm on a leading link suspension. there will be no action whereas in the telescopic type the suspension will act even with the front brake held tight. so basically whilst riding and during braking on broken roads the leading link will harden up and not act but shudder and thud. besides the leading link suspension has been abandoned my all manufacturers except in cases where cost is a factor.

the aviator sports a telescopic suspension.
True, the performance of this suspension is not compare able to the telescopic.
but wait. The suspension has also got to do with the design of the vehicle.

Also, scooters are designed for slow speed driving and bikes for faster speeds, telescopic makes more sence there.
It also changes the frame design, coz a different type of fork is required and potentially increases the costs of manufacture.If one is looking for a overall exciting scooter with power and one which can do high speeds he/she should consider getting a bike.

One can not have any kind of suspension on any design.
The leading link, may not be the best but as I said before does serve the purpose well enough. I've found it satisfactory, as long as its serviced on a regular basis.
I havent checkout the suspension by pressing it down, the the kines would get presses easily when the shocks were in bad shape. One thing i dislike about telescopic shocks is that they get compressed every time one hits the brake, find that very irritating.

Comming to the the Aviator, i Saw it today, The sides of the rear look remarkably similar to the activa, just that its been redesigned with shorter curvier body cover/mudguards and new lights. the display console is pretty dull.
I though it was the same activa frame with a redesigned front end and body which is a touch less broad than the activa, with more plastic less metal. 3 months waiting time, I'd just go get a flyte or kinetic 4s if nothing. heck, one was enough with the activa. I dont think it some custom scooter to wait for that long.
On the other hand if one books through the district dealer 20 km outside the city, delivery is in 3 working days.
Yet to get a TD.
__________________
FIAT!
gendarmee is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 14th March 2008, 23:05   #26 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: bangalore
Posts: 300
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gendarmee View Post
True, the performance of this suspension is not compare able to the telescopic.
but wait.
thank you. btw where is your youtube video of putting an old kinetic-honda on stand?
__________________
life is a beach....enjoy it!

surYa
hollywoodhogan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th March 2008, 23:09   #27 (permalink)
BHPian
 
gendarmee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 518
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by hollywoodhogan View Post
Thank you. btw where is your you tube video of putting an old kinetic-honda on stand?
The body of the post has the message, not just the first line.

Been very busy lately. On a day when i get back home before sunset, i'll record and post it.
__________________
FIAT!
gendarmee is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2008, 12:14   #28 (permalink)
Newbie
 
Etrnlwanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ernakulam
Posts: 10
Default

So finally...of the two, which is a better scooter.. the Aviator or the Access? ( I need a new scooter, and I dont fancy the flashy looking Flyte so that's off my list)
Playing it safe, I've booked the Access, but the wait period for the Access is 2 months while the Aviator could be delivered within 10 days. I test drove both, but there isnt much to chose between them. The Access sure looks a little staid in its style vis-a-vis the Aviator , but then its got an awesome mileage factor going for it and the fact that for the same price range you're getting a 125 cc scooter.
Man! This dilema is driving me nuts!
Help, anybody?
__________________
Drive defensively - buy a tank.
Etrnlwanderer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2008, 18:45   #29 (permalink)
BHPian
 
gendarmee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 518
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Etrnlwanderer View Post
which is a better scooter.. the Aviator or the Access?
Neither of the 2 have any serious drawbacks.
I found the aviator to be a redesigned activa with a new exterior,body & front fork suspension part, has the super dependable Activa engine.
The access is light and easy to tread in traffic, slightly cramped under seat space, and is torquey.
__________________
FIAT!
gendarmee is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2008, 21:50   #30 (permalink)
Newbie
 
Etrnlwanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ernakulam
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gendarmee View Post
Neither of the 2 have any serious drawbacks.
I found the aviator to be a redesigned activa with a new exterior,body & front fork suspension part, has the super dependable Activa engine.
The access is light and easy to tread in traffic, slightly cramped under seat space, and is torquey.
Thanks mate! I think my preference is slowly but surely shifting towards the Access. "Torquey" is the key word, should be fun to ride in the city if its got a little zip, dont you think?
And like you mentioned, if the Aviator is just a revamped Activa engine, why not buy the Activa itself! hehe
__________________
Drive defensively - buy a tank.
Etrnlwanderer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Got my Honda Aviator vivekji05 Motorbikes 18 10th June 2009 17:40
Honda Aviator Help Needed! Bluu Motorbikes 8 2nd June 2009 15:45
Activa or Aviator ? lambuhere1 Motorbikes 6 21st July 2008 12:31
A new Aviator or the same old Pulsar ? Please help. sary Motorbikes 19 22nd April 2008 12:24
Honda City and CR-V - Driving Impression!!! Shan2nu Test-Drives & Initial Ownership Reports 6 8th May 2004 13:15


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 11:04.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Team-BHP.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552