Go Back   Team-BHP > BHP India > Team-BHP Reviews > Official New Car Reviews


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th November 2016, 17:02   #1
BHPian
 
Omkar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 151
Thanked: 736 Times
Default Renault Kwid AMT (Automatic) : Official Review

The Renault Kwid AMT has been launched in India at a price of Rs. 4.25 lakhs (ex-Delhi).

What you'll like:

• Automatic is priced merely 30,000 rupees over the 1.0L MT! City convenience for cheap
• AMTs deliver better fuel-economy than conventional torque-converter ATs
• Distinctive styling! Looks swell for an A-segment hatchback
• Well-packaged cabin with good space, comfy seats, lots of storage & a huge 300 liter boot
• Suspension offers a comfortable ride with neutral handling. 180 mm of GC too
• Equipment in a budget car (driver's airbag, digital meter cluster, touchscreen ICE, navigation, full MID & more)

What you won't:

• A bare-bones AT! Manual mode, sport mode, creep feature & larger brake pedal are all missing
• AMTs simply lack the smoothness & shift-speed of conventional ATs
• Some essential features absent (internally adjustable ORVMs, retractable rear seatbelts etc.)
• Tyres & brakes should have been beefed up on the 1.0L AMT variant
• 28 litre fuel tank is the smallest in the segment and its 5 meter turning radius the biggest
• Renault's dealer & after-sales network is far weaker than that of Maruti & Hyundai


Last edited by GTO : 30th November 2016 at 17:08.
Omkar is online now   (24) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2016, 17:03   #2
BHPian
 
Omkar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 151
Thanked: 736 Times
Default

Since the Renault Kwid has already been reviewed by Team-BHP, this report will only focus on changes made to the AMT variant.

Click here to read the full road-test of the Kwid 0.8L.

Click here to check out the Kwid 1.0L review.


Last edited by GTO : 30th November 2016 at 17:07.
Omkar is online now   (14) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2016, 17:03   #3
BHPian
 
Omkar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 151
Thanked: 736 Times
Default

The last straw from the Kwid bunch is out with the 1.0 AMT. The AMT variant was first showcased at the 2016 Auto Expo and grabbed some eyeballs at the event (link to report). But we knew about the automatic even before that - at the time of the Kwid's original unveiling, BHPian SnS_12 told us where the AT's rotary knob is going to be placed (link to post)!

Automatics have always been the transmission of choice in the premium segments. However, it's not like economy segment customers don't want convenience - they most certainly do! This is where the AMT (automated manual transmission) comes in. This cheaper automatic technology is best suited to budget cars as it's relatively inexpensive to buy, has simpler mechanicals (thus lower maintenance bills than say, a DSG) and manages to return acceptable fuel economy. What's more, the AMT can be bolted onto any manual-transmission car. A manufacturer doesn't need to design a new slushbox from the ground up.

You have to give credit to Renault for continuously updating the Kwid. Such updates are key to keep the momentum going. After the 0.8L's launch in September 2015, the 1.0L variant was introduced in August 2016 and now, the AMT has arrived. Does the strategy look familiar? Yep, it's a cut-copy-paste of the Maruti Alto textbook. The Kwid's unique proposition & strong marketing push have rewarded it with splendid sales figures. The monthly sales average is around the 10,000 mark, while the total sales (since launch) are 1.07 lakhs! It outsells all other Renault-Nissan-Datsun cars combined. That's a tremendous achievement; it also proves that the cautious Indian entry-level customer will move away from the 'safe brands' if there is sufficient differentiation & the value proposition is too hard to resist.

Renault Kwid AMT (Automatic) : Official Review-kwidcomparosheetamt.jpg

The AMT is available only in the top end RXT (O) variant. One good thing about the Kwid AMT is that Renault has made the Driver Airbag standard (was optional on the 1.0 MT). The 1.0 SCe AMT gets all the features from the Kwid 1.0's optional package, including front seatbelt pretensioners + load limiters, leather insert on the steering wheel and some chrome touches too. About time for Renault to start offering ABS on the Kwid, we say!

Renault has priced the Kwid AMT at Rs. 4.25 lakhs which is just Rs. 30,000 above the 1.0 MT. This has got to be the lowest premium on an Automatic - even the Nano AMT carries a Rs. 41,000 premium, while for Maruti, it hovers between 42,000 - 47,000 rupees. Renault is consistently keeping the Kwid's VFM quotient in place; remember how the 1.0L variant was priced merely 22k over the 0.8L?

On the flip side, the Kwid's AMT is also a bare-basic deployment. It uses the main ECU itself (not a separate one for the transmission), and doesn't even have creep / manual mode / sport mode functionality (all of which are available in the Nano!!). Renault appears to have forgotten that one of the reasons behind the Kwid's success has been its impressive feature list. We wish they charged 10,000 rupees more and gave us an AMT with all the missing features.

So, what's new on the outside?

Umm, nothing. The AMT gets no cosmetic updates over the 1.0 MT. It looks exactly the same...


… except for this small 'Easy-R' AMT badge at the rear. Renault wants you to read Easy-R as easier:


The Kwid AMT is available only with the 1.0 engine. Smart move, the additional power is always welcome when you have a lazy transmission. Can't say the same about this loud chequered-flag sticker though (should be simple to replace with a plain black one like the Kwid 800):


AT exclusively on the RXT. We won't complain about the lack of variants as the RXT is the only one with the driver-side airbag:

Last edited by GTO : 30th November 2016 at 17:06.
Omkar is online now   (19) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2016, 17:03   #4
BHPian
 
Omkar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 151
Thanked: 736 Times
Default

So, what's new on the inside?

The dashboard layout remains the same as the Kwid MT, except for the AT dial which has been placed on the centre fascia (Kwid MT gets a blank filler there) & absent gear stick. The AT knob's unique placement is quite comfortable & ergonomic to use. Also, since you won't be using it too much (except while parking), there's nothing to complain about:


Rotary knob with merely 3 positions reminds us of toy cars . Dial didn't feel that cheap (neither is it premium in anyway). Its operation is smooth enough too. The center area with the red marker is fixed, only the outer ring moves. No safety issue as the driver needs to press the brake pedal to move it from N->D or N->R:


"Look ma, no gear lever"!! What you get instead is this deep cubbyhole (750 ml bottle shown here). On a lighter note, BHPian DryIce said "I am worried about a water bottle placed in that cubby hole. New owners (who shift from an MT) may find a bottle in their hands when all they wanted, was to engage reverse!"




RXT (O) trim means you get a leather wrap & airbag here:


Digital instrument cluster is almost identical to the MT, except for...


…this 'foot on brake pedal' light which keeps on blinking if your foot isn't on the brake pedal when required (i.e. starting the car, moving to D / R). It's accompanied by 4 audible beeps:


The gear position is displayed on the bottom left. If the brake pedal isn't pressed properly while switching between the modes, this indicator starts blinking as well. You don't get a useful readout for the currently engaged gear (Maruti Alto has it):


No dead pedal here (Alto AMT doesn't have one either). There is enough place to rest your left foot though:


Sadly, the brake pedal is the same small size as the MT!! Usually, ATs get a bigger / wider brake pedal (likewise with the Alto AMT). This is definitely the most bare-bones AT deployment we've see in the Indian car market. Not cool, Renault. As feature-packed as your MT is, the AT misses the bare essentials!


AMT instructions provided on the driver's sunvisor:

Last edited by GTO : 30th November 2016 at 17:05.
Omkar is online now   (19) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2016, 17:03   #5
BHPian
 
Omkar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 151
Thanked: 736 Times
Default

Driving the Kwid AMT

Kwid 1.0L makes 67 BHP @ 5,500 rpm and 91 Nm @ 4,250 rpm. Good call in offering the AMT only on the more powerful 1.0, and not the 0.8L:


AMT components sit next to the gearbox:


The engine & gearbox are controlled by the same ECU (not separate ones like in other cars). One of the reasons for its competitive price:


What is an AMT? Mechanically, the AMT gearbox is identical to the Kwid's 5-speed manual transmission. What's different is how the clutch is operated and how the gears are shifted. In the manual, the driver is responsible for these tasks. With the AMT, hydraulic actuators located in the engine bay operate the clutch and shift gears. There's no clutch pedal, and zero driver input is required for gearshifts, making it exactly like a conventional automatic to operate. Simply put, the mechanical functions of operating the clutch and gear-lever have moved from inside the cabin to the engine bay.

This AMT unit isn't the same as the one in the Duster AMT. The Duster uses a ZF Sachs AMT, while the Maruti-Suzuki cars deploy Magneti Marelli AMTs. The AMT of the Kwid is developed with Bosch (hardware) and FEV (software).

Starting the Kwid AMT: Turn the key into ON position and you'll hear a wheezy sound. No need to worry, that's just the AMT gearbox initialising. Slot the shift control dial to N position, press the brake pedal and crank the engine after 3 seconds (it won't start if you don't wait). With the brake pedal pressed, turn the dial from N to D mode and off you go! If the brake pedal isn't pressed, the system warns you with 4 beeps and the 'foot on brake pedal' light.

In city traffic: The start-off is smooth and the AMT has adequate pep to handle the typical urban conditions. The Kwid is a good city commuter and the AMT just adds to the ease of driving. The high seating position and manoeuvrability make the car a breeze to drive around. Just slot her into 'D' and let the AMT's hydraulics (instead of your limbs) take care of the clutch & gearshifts. You can cruise around with just one hand + one leg. The light steering, healthy visibility & small footprint also contribute to making things effortless. If you like the Kwid & drive in traffic everyday, the 30k price premium makes this AT a no-brainer. Your left leg will thank you.

One problem with the Kwid AMT though is the absence of a 'creep' function (crawling without accelerator input). Competing AMT units get 'creep' which means you can drive in bumper-to-bumper traffic with just one pedal. Translated, leave the brake pedal, close the gap to the car in front and press the brake again. In the Kwid however, you have to alternate between the brake & accelerator pedals. Drive around for a considerable amount of time in tight traffic & you'll realise just how big a miss 'creep' is. You'll also miss the creep function while parking in a tight spot. For instance, with the Alto AMT, you can slowly inch into the parking spot without pressing the accelerator.

While the lack of the creep feature means you don't have to keep the brake pedal pressed at red lights, we still recommend doing so for safety reasons (in case you get rear-ended & to prevent rolling if the road has even a slight slope).

Gearshift quality: AMTs aren't known for their gearshift quality and no, the Kwid AMT is nowhere as smooth as a torque-converter slushbox or CVT. No comparison. The gearshifts are indeed very noticeable and yes, that infamous head bob is still there (especially in the lower gears). You move forward with the gap in power delivery, as the AMT slowly shifts up to the next gear. Some of you might get used to this, others will find it to be a deal-breaker. Be sure to go for a long test-drive before cutting a cheque. First-time automatic drivers won't have any complaints with the AMT. However, those used to smoother AT gearboxes will definitely notice the compromise.

The good news is, a feather-light foot will control the head bob to tolerable levels (a heavy foot makes it more prominent). Best to drive the AMT with minimal accelerator inputs around town since the drop in acceleration at each shift won't be as large. Important to note that, no matter how evident the gearshifts seem to the driver, passengers will barely notice them! Passengers just don't anticipate shifts the same way the driver does, and this makes it a smoother ride for them. Then, there are some driving tips you can apply to make your gearshift experience smoother. Here's one that some will be okay with, others might find cumbersome: When accelerating up to speed, let off the accelerator at intervals, and the AMT will cease that opportunity to upshift. E.g. When going from 0-40 km/h, let off the accelerator very slightly right after ~10, ~20 and ~30 km/h, and the AMT will take each one of those opportunities to upshift a gear - almost like you told it to! Finally, you'll be happy to know that shift quality gets better between higher gears, and is virtually seamless when going downhill.

On the rare occasions that you floor the accelerator hard, you'll see the AMT trying miserably to match the sudden requirement of power. The shifts are extremely jerky when driven like this, and the typical 'head bob' is transformed into a full body jerk!! The engine also gets noisy at high rpms, so it's just better to back off.

Lastly, you can hear the gears shifting in the Kwid (if you pay attention). Things weren't so obvious in the Marutis.

Slowing down & the absence of Manual Mode: Let go of the accelerator and you'll see that downshifts also happen with a little head bob. But what will really get your goat is the absence of manual mode. In the Alto AMT, you can downshift (using manual mode) to slow the car down via engine braking. Not so with the Kwid where you'll have to depend on the brakes only. This can get pretty unnerving on downhill slopes & mountain roads. Continuous downhill driving can overheat the brakes. What's worse, if you gain a bit of speed or take your foot off the accelerator, the transmission will upshift (the last thing you want when rolling down)!! Solution = Manipulate and keep the speed low to prevent an upshift.

This absence of manual mode can be a deal-breaker. Unlike the Alto AMT, you cannot choose a gear to climb a steep incline in. Lastly, the missing manual mode means you can't prepare the car for overtaking (before the actual move). In an Alto, you can downshift, bring the engine into its power band and then move out of your lane to overtake. With the Kwid, you have to be patient.

Highway performance: The Kwid 0.8L wasn't much of a highway performer, but that was fixed with the 1.0. The AMT unit is nicely mated to the 1.0L for relaxed cruising. On the highway, gathering speed isn't much of an issue and the engine-gearbox combo works well in tandem. We suggest cruising at a comfortable pace in the middle lane (vis a vis trying to drive hard in the fast lane). After all, the AMT is about convenience, not outright performance. You can cruise at 100 km/h in the Kwid AMT - we don't recommend going higher in a basic economy hatchback.

Overtaking will need some planning though. The AMT acts very dumb-witted if you ask for a quick response. It takes a second or two to downshift when you suddenly floor the accelerator to overtake the car in front of you. Even then, power delivery isn't instantaneous and hence, it's advised to keep safe gaps for overtaking. Since manual mode isn't available with this AMT unit, downshifting before overtaking isn't an option. It will definitely take you longer to overtake than in an Alto AMT. What's more, the Kwid AMT can decide to upshift in the middle of an overtaking move (in the Alto, you can hold the gear to the redline). Just be cautious out there.

Handling inclines: In stop & go traffic on an uphill stretch, the AMT will roll back between your releasing the brake pedal & pressing the accelerator. As is the norm with AMTs, you'll have to heavily rely on the handbrake to avoid rollback. Be sure to use the handbrake properly, else you'll be burning the clutch up. The low end torque of the 1.0L is satisfactory by segment standards and the car has no trouble going up inclines. If parking on a slope, make sure you leave the knob in R/D position and engage the handbrake (there's no 'Park' mode in an AMT).

Fuel-efficiency: The Kwid's AMT is tuned for economy and is always eager to upshift. You'll see it moving into 2nd at 12-13 kmph! The ARAI-tested fuel economy is 24.04 kmpl which is ~1 kmpl more than the manual variant. AMTs generally deliver good fuel economy (unlike the fuel guzzling torque-converter ATs - talk to any i10 AT owner). Plus, the Kwid has a 3-cylinder engine which is inherently more efficient.

Additional Points:
  • We had mentioned this in the Kwid 1.0 review too - Renault should be selling the 1.0 with beefier brakes. This is all the more required in the AMT variant where you lose out on engine braking (versus the MT). Overall braking is as expected in an economy hatchback (read = nothing to write home about), but they are more suited to an easy driving style. We wish Renault had provided ABS & given more powerful brakes here.
  • Despite its shortcomings, the AMT manages the clutch & gearbox a lot better than sub-par drivers out there. There's no doubt that it is more talented than a below-average driver in choosing when to shift, how to shift and what gear to be in.
  • The vehicle cannot be started with the gear selection knob in R or D positions. N only.
  • If the shift control dial hasn't been slotted in position properly, 'R-N' or 'N-D' will start blinking together on the MID.
  • For regular usage, there is no need to use Neutral, other than for starting the Kwid.
  • If you're buying the Kwid AMT, be sure to get the extended warranty for 4 years / 80,000 km. While the AMT is mechanically very simple, we still don't know how its long-term performance will be.
  • Renault says they aren't offering the creep function 'based on owner feedback'. Really? How come the thrice-as-expensive Duster AMT has it then? Hogwash.
Omkar is online now   (34) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2016, 17:10   #6
GTO
Team-BHP Support
 
GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bombay
Posts: 44,124
Thanked: 65,072 Times
Default Re: Renault Kwid AMT (Automatic) : Official Review

Thread moved from the Assembly Line (The "Assembly Line" Forum section) to the Official Review Section. Thanks for sharing, Omkar! Rating 5 stars.

As a car, I like the Kwid more and that'll be my choice among the manuals.

However, for an Automatic which is the talking point of this review, I would choose the Alto AMT over the Kwid any day anytime. Renault has stripped the AMT (an already basic automatic) of crucial features. The lack of manual mode is disappointing. These 3-cylinder 1.0s are small engines at the end of the day and there will be several situations where you need manual mode (overtaking, climbing steep inclines, engine braking down the ghats). No creep is another bummer; how can you make it harder to use an AT??? The Alto AMT provides both of these features and more. All automatics aren't equal and the Alto's is clearly the superior deployment. Plus, I like the Maruti 1.0 engine more than Renault's.

I wish Renault had just charged Rs. 10,000 extra and given it all the regular AT features. I'm disappointed because Renault - of all brands - should know that features are important in this segment. Impressive equipment levels were a major contributing factor to the Kwid's success & differentiation formula.

Last edited by GTO : 30th November 2016 at 17:12.
GTO is offline   (24) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2016, 17:35   #7
BHPian
 
avdhesh15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 440
Thanked: 448 Times
Default Re: Renault Kwid AMT (Automatic) : Official Review

Superb review! But the lack of the Rs 10,000 AMT functions will be a deal breaker for many. Surely they will learn from "customer feedback" and implement these changes. Overall a good move, but just stopped short of being perfect. Good to see market leaders being challenged in their turf.
avdhesh15 is offline   (3) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2016, 18:07   #8
Distinguished - BHPian
 
RavenAvi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Flying Around
Posts: 4,107
Thanked: 16,462 Times
Default Re: Renault Kwid AMT (Automatic) : Official Review

Excellent review, Omkar. Rated 5 stars!


3 costly misses which could have otherwise made the Renault Kwid Easy-R AMT the perfect urban runabout and the occasional highway runner:

1) No "creep" function.

Those who maneuver their cars through tight and congested city conditions will know how valuable the "creep" function is, specially for parking in tight spots and at stop-go signals.

2) No Manual mode.

Owner would have no control of the car, when the D mode is selected. Slopes/inclines/overbridges/basement parkings, etc., would need plenty of careful skill.

3) No RxT AMT on offer.

At around 12,000-15,000 rupees cheaper than the RxT (O), the RxT could have given the Maruti-Suzuki Alto K10 AGS nightmares because it would have arrived at almost the same price at which the Maruti is priced at!

Renault Kwid AMT (Automatic) : Official Review-untitled.jpg
(ex-showroom, Delhi pricing for Metallic/Non-Metallic)

It would have also served the company better to advertise the starting price as the same at which the Maruti offering is placed in the market.

A small, but critical miss.

Now, the difference between the AMT variants of both cars might look small, yet it is significant enough for Maruti SAs to highlight that the Alto K10 AGS is cheaper than the Kwid AMT, while offering manual mode, "creep" function, etc.

The Kwid is Renault India's bread-and-butter car at the moment. They would be served even better if they did enough to improve further on the ~10,000 monthly sales numbers the Kwid has been racking up in recent times. No doubt that the AMT version will sell well too, but Renault could have made it a very tempting and compelling package if they incorporated the above. Hopefully in the near future, they will do these corrections to make the market leader very uneasy in something which has otherwise been their comfort zone.

Last edited by RavenAvi : 30th November 2016 at 18:33. Reason: missed a few words
RavenAvi is offline   (9) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2016, 18:27   #9
BHPian
 
landcruiser123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: BLR, KA, IND
Posts: 651
Thanked: 751 Times
Default Re: Renault Kwid AMT (Automatic) : Official Review

Renault should have just given paddle shifters to make one more segment distinguishing feature.

The lack of essential features is a stupid move by Renault. Also, Renault could have charged more, but should have included hill start assist.

Overall, the Kwid is appealing as a second city car to me. Small, good GC, decently spacious and has got a massive boot- all with an Automatic option now.
landcruiser123 is online now   (5) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2016, 18:30   #10
BHPian
 
guptad42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 83
Thanked: 21 Times
Default Re: Renault Kwid AMT (Automatic) : Official Review

I was dreading this conclusion!
The Kwid is so much better than Alto in interior space, comfort and features that I was loathe to reconsider Alto K10 AMT, even though I found the Alto good to drive. But Kwid's AMT is just not safe. So, I have to go back to Alto.


I mean how hard could it have been to give us up and down buttons on the steering (down on the left spoke and up on the right) and link them to the ECU? Renalut could have gone to town about the amazing 'new' feature - gear control on the steering wheel! ( I know it does the same job as paddles, but those aren't ON the steering wheel.)

Hopefully, Kwid will still offer reasonable competition to Alto and Celerio AMT in sales and help keep prices down.

Does anyone know if the Alto AMT refinements were implemented in the Celerio AMT? The Alto AMT felt much smoother than the Celerio when it came out.
guptad42 is offline   (2) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2016, 19:27   #11
BHPian
 
kisharchit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Noida/Delhi
Posts: 282
Thanked: 328 Times
Default Re: Renault Kwid AMT (Automatic) : Official Review

Excellent review and one I have been waiting for long. A couple of friends have been waiting to buy this car but there was no proper review to refer to. I guess with this review, renault can add some more sales.

I think for city pottering the car is fine. Yes it does not have manual mode but it is fine I guess in city limits.
kisharchit is offline   (1) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2016, 19:28   #12
BHPian
 
Cooltronics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 185
Thanked: 81 Times
Default Re: Renault Kwid AMT (Automatic) : Official Review

Out of all the aspects discussed, I, for once, like the usual size of brake pedal. Larger brake pedals are making first time drivers use their left leg to apply brake which is MONSTROUS MISTAKE
I was travelling in a cab and was hit behind by an AMT Celerio twice within 2 minutes in bumper to bumper traffic and on asking came to know that the lady was using left leg for brakes and right leg for accelerator. In fact many of my known friends have expressed comfort in driving like it, little knowing the adverse effect of it
Cooltronics is offline   (3) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2016, 19:45   #13
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Rajeevraj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 2,956
Thanked: 6,372 Times
Default Re: Renault Kwid AMT (Automatic) : Official Review

Great Review. Thanks for sharing.

Good to see the Kwid get an AMT variant and that too at a 30K premium. But the lack of a manual mode or S mode is unforgivable. Even on my Vento TSI DSG which is arguably the best AT Box around from a performance perspective, there are instances, maybe 5% of the time where I need to pop it into S or even into Manual mode to get the control I want. Omitting this in a basic AMT set up in an entry car is actually very risky in my opinion. Our driving conditions are way too unpredictable to manage without some level of manual control.

Quite a pity. A nice car, priced well but with this huge deal breaker.
Rajeevraj is offline   (4) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2016, 19:54   #14
BHPian
 
rageshgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chennai/Vaikom
Posts: 316
Thanked: 151 Times
Default Re: Renault Kwid AMT (Automatic) : Official Review

Great review! Has exactly the details I was looking for.

The Kwid took the fight to the Alto in most of its key areas, and now with the AMT, Alto has its task cut out.

The lack of creep, S, and M modes are a downer. But knowing Renault, and how they have reacted to customer feedback in the past, they might come up with an iteration with some of these missed features added.
rageshgr is offline   (2) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2016, 21:40   #15
BHPian
 
400notout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Navi Mumbai
Posts: 105
Thanked: 179 Times
Default Re: Renault Kwid AMT (Automatic) : Official Review

I successfully coaxed my father in law to go for the Kwid AMT. Took some persuasion converting an alto owner to buy a Renault. He needed the car urgently and Renault thrissur gave him the car in the first lot of 30 they ordered. Earlier they had quoted a waiting of around a month then one day suddenly post demonetisation they called him up and said he could have the car in a week if he made the payment.

My first choice was a Tiago AMT but that didnt seem happening soon. Had already booked Celerio ZXI AMT opt but MS cited a waiting period of 1 month for the said model, without airbags the model was available within a couple of days preferebly LX model. We were waiting for that when the Renault KWID AMT news came out. I asked him to go have a look. He did and he liked what he saw but the dealer couldn't arrange for a test drive. The dealer followed up when a test drive car was available, my FIL didnt have any trouble driving it, He hadn't driven automatics previously. He made the payment via cheque and is awaiting delivery in a couple of days.

Some pointers during the purchase

1) He got a call from sundaram insurance that his car is insured from date 29th Nov. When he said he was yet to receive the car, they asked him to ask the dealer to change the date. Whats the usual process here?

2) The dealer has refused to register the car, they have asked him to register the car himself at the RTO. They will just deliver with temporary registration. First time I'm hearing this. Are procedures different in kerala? Has someone faced something similar?

All in all pretty excited to have the car in the family, will share pics when it arrives.
400notout is offline   (2) Thanks Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Renault Kwid 1.0L : Official Review Vid6639 Official New Car Reviews 57 5th December 2016 11:20
2016 Renault Duster Facelift & AMT (Automatic) : Official Review Aditya Official New Car Reviews 228 3rd December 2016 20:33
Renault Kwid : Official Review Vid6639 Official New Car Reviews 504 26th November 2016 12:21
The Renault Kwid AMT. EDIT: Launched at Rs. 4.25 lakh dZired The Indian Car Scene 63 23rd November 2016 20:40


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 22:10.

Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks