Go Back   Team-BHP > Team-BHP > Road Safety


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th August 2018, 23:51   #361
BHPian
 
VKumar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: NCR
Posts: 371
Thanked: 1,745 Times
Default Re: XUV500: Severe crash, but not a single airbag deployed (driver injured)

Quote:
Originally Posted by honeybee View Post
After....No panchnama, FIR copy, nothing.
So you want the copies of those documents to get some 'first hand' info of the accident. But why? Will that make a difference? If yes, then what?



Quote:
We have heard the manufacturer's response and since they have been denied access to thw vehicle, that response will only be a standard marketing response.
Manufacturer wants an access to the vehicle, quite acceptable. But how can Mr. Arvind trust them?


Quote:
I for one am not inclined to particularly favour one party over the other.
Nobody is, everyone here is asking Mahindra to come up with a reasonable explanation or find a midway with Mr. Arvind when it comes to investigation. Here we have Team-BHP homepage having a news section and featured display of Ford denying a media car (Who knows what actual reason is?) and you are talking about taking sides when we have a father looking at his son suffering with brain injuries just because he feels that probably an airbag deployment would have saved his son from what he is undergoing?


What Mr. Arvind is demanding is a simple probe and Mahindra to give him some details of a few components and help him with investigations. Here we have multiple BHPians Tweeting to Mahindra - why didn't they come up with a credible answer? Let me make it clear again, nobody is blaming Mahindra; people are only looking for an answer to the question that has risen out of this particular accident.


Quote:
Originally Posted by chinkara View Post
2. It seems Arvind had asked...should have come.
Completely agree, if Mahindra is being completely transparent then they should instead co-operate and see how can they help Mr. Arvind discover the truth.



These companies put entire teams to work at times for even shallow tasks, here they have simply turned a cold shoulder and ignored the spark awaiting to let it die.


Quote:
Originally Posted by roy_libran View Post
...and I'd request everyone to reconsider on this request.

+1


Quote:
Our forum has been the single biggest channel..Let us not cut him off from this link.
Indeed, this forum is powerful enough that it can at least help him get as close to the truth as possible. It's Team-BHP; this forum stands for truth, and if Mr. Arvind gets disappointment from here too, then what is the difference between us and the guys who write what manufacturers want them to?
VKumar is offline   (9) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 12th August 2018, 00:19   #362
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dombivli
Posts: 2,748
Thanked: 1,489 Times
Default Re: XUV500: Severe crash, but not a single airbag deployed (driver injured)

Quote:
Originally Posted by VKumar View Post
Manufacturer wants an access to the vehicle, quite acceptable. But how can Mr. Arvind trust them?
There you have written the answer to this whole dilemma yourself.

Under the present condition the manufacturer is the only entity fit enough to investigate and find out what really happened with the vehicle.

The FIR or panchnama would give some details about how the accident took place.

Unless this impasse is broken and some form of investigation other than speculation and emotional discharge is carried out, this discussion is headed nowhere.

And I think it's perfectly reasonable on the part of the company to demand and get access to the vehicle in question if they have to face a culpable homicide charge. It's only fair. The more you keep denying it, the more you drive away from the possibility of finding out the truth and finding a solution to this issue.

Found your statement of 'nobody blaming Mahindra' quite ironical, where people are not only blaming them for putting unsafe vehicles out on the roads, but also trying to drown out the few voices of reason trying to go by rational thought and not merely get carried away by emotions.

What do you expect Mahindra to do? What response do you expect from the manufacturer? And without getting access to the vehicle how would a manufacturer react?

From an anguished post by a grieving father, this thread has become a Mahindra bashing one, showing more mob mentality than any sense or reason.

If Team BHP and its members stand by fairness above all, why are we not asking for the process of law to be initiated instead of mere opinions and feelings driving the entire discussion?

Peace out.

Last edited by suhaas307 : 12th August 2018 at 09:04. Reason: Minor typos
honeybee is offline   (9) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 12th August 2018, 06:00   #363
BHPian
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 437
Thanked: 350 Times
Default Re: XUV500: Severe crash, but not a single airbag deployed (driver injured)

Quote:
Originally Posted by honeybee View Post

Request mods to please close the thread.
I have been reading this thread since the beginning and i don't understand this request to close this thread.

If we start closing threads because members criticise a manufacturer and few others don't like it, then we will be pretty much closing all such threads.

I am no expert (since that is the fashionable thing to say) but this accident clearly is a one where Airbags should have deployed.. period. It doesn't matter if the manufacturer is M&M or Tata or Merc or VW or any other manufacturer. If this is the intended outcome of Mahindra's implementation, then there is something wrong in their implementation and it should be rectified. If it is a one-off, they should find out why it happened.

I have seen some members mentioning that maybe the victim was not wearing seatbelt. It is possible (although his father is saying otherwise). But from what i could gather it is not gospel truth that airbags will be deployed only if seat belts are worn. Even for front airbags, it depends on the implementation and it seems there are many types of implementations (default deployment, passenger detection, dual stage etc) where airbags will deploy even if it is not worn. So it is important we understand how it is implemented in the XUV. I hope someone can answer this. I will try to understand from my sources in the company too.

For the side and curtain airbags it (wearing of seatbelts) doesn't seem to be a necessary requirement in most implementations.

Mahindra owes an explanation and should understand the lack of confidence in them. But if we go by the wishy-washy explanation they gave on the other incident (XUV aquaplaning) then i don't see much of point in that. I have nothing against Mahindra and i would be the first one to agree that in the Indian scenario irrespective of which manufacturer it is, the situation will probably the same (the lack of confidence of they being fair and transparent)

Regarding the opinion of the person SDP quoted. I won't give much credence to it. He seems to be finding an explanation to the outcome (airbags not deploying) rather than trying to analyse if the outcome itself is what is expected. Plus he seems to have got some basic things wrong (like the statement that 'front cross member is not impacted'. To me it clearly is). I won't blame him as he probably did a quick and cursory job without giving too much attention. So, to me it is just another opinion just like others, nothing more, nothing less.

So i would say let the discussion go on. I am sure some good will come out of it

Last edited by Mohan Mathew A : 12th August 2018 at 06:02.
Mohan Mathew A is offline   (14) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 12th August 2018, 08:49   #364
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Gurgaon
Posts: 202
Thanked: 116 Times
Default Re: XUV500: Severe crash, but not a single airbag deployed (driver injured)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mohan Mathew A View Post

So i would say let the discussion go on. I am sure some good will come out of it
Agree. Also agree with your point that this need not be Mahindra specific, but a full discussion will help illuminate the area of safety for all manufacturers.

Safety equipment can save lives. I am a first hand exhibit of that. About 6 years back, when NH8 expansion was going on, I was driving too slow (~50) in my Wagon R. A truck sped from the left, suddenly realized that there was a diversion (and hence I had slowed down), tried to cut to the right and banged my left rear. Car picked up trucks's momentum, moved right, hit the boulders NHAI had placed to indicate "road closed"and toppled over. My wife and I were hanging upside down but uninjured, thanks to the seat-belt. So we unbuckled ourselves, with the help of locals got out of the door and straightened the car. The truck driver had fled - he was sure there were fatalities. I actually took the car to MASS Behror, and completed the trip to Jaisalmer. Everywhere we went, people came over to see the car with paints peeled off on the sides and roof(!). But we completed the trip without any hassle (except for a puncture and tyre change at noon in the middle of the desert).

In another incident I know of, a colleague's Honda Accord was smashed in a 3 car pile up - the car before him braked suddenly, the LCV behind him could not and he was sandwiched in between. Thanks's to crumple zones and airbags all 4 passengers (he and his brother in law in front, wife and sister at the back) survived with minor injuries. He was so thankful of the safety features that after scrapping the car he bought another Accord. So I know that Accord is a safe car.

No matter how carefully you drive, there can be accidents. And I would certainly be very keen to understand in what conditions the safety equipment will work and in what conditions it will not.

Last edited by SDP : 12th August 2018 at 10:31. Reason: Typo
chinkara is offline   (8) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 12th August 2018, 09:21   #365
BHPian
 
revvharder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Delhi
Posts: 41
Thanked: 124 Times
Infractions: 0/1 (5)
Default

Guy's the discussion is going in circles and will keep going in circles until the manufacturer or the OP returns or shares something with us. Because we can only think of what happened or what should have happened and i think 25 pages are enough for that. Everyone wants to help OP but everyone here is held back in their own way and the thing is unless some technical guys investigate the vehicle we cannot do anything. So guys i would request everyone to post only if something important comes up and refrain ourselves from piling up pages until OP arrives with some answers and then continue our discussion.

Sorry mods for back to back posts.
Guy's Arvind is consulting an international crash test consultant in Germany. The consultant gave some queries which Arvind forwarded to Mahindra, but they are silent on these points and reply to everything except them.
He says "If they answer these, my consultant can immediately suggest the best agency to investigate"
Following are the questions:
Q1) Would like to have a copy of the 'Type' Approval for Mahindra Xuv500, manufacturing year 2013, issued by ARAI
Q2)'Type' Approval and the test report of Frontal and Curtain Airbags from the Approval Body including ARAI.
Q3) Name of Test Agency who approved it if anyone different.
Q4) Are these test reports part of ARAI and valid for sale in India ?
Can anyone can help dig up some answers ?

Last edited by SDP : 12th August 2018 at 18:31. Reason: Merging back to back posts
revvharder is offline   (10) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 12th August 2018, 18:04   #366
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dombivli
Posts: 2,748
Thanked: 1,489 Times
Default Re: XUV500: Severe crash, but not a single airbag deployed (driver injured)

Quote:
Originally Posted by revvharder View Post
...
Following are the questions:
Q1) Would like to have a copy of the 'Type' Approval for Mahindra Xuv500, manufacturing year 2013, issued by ARAI
Q2)'Type' Approval and the test report of Frontal and Curtain Airbags from the Approval Body including ARAI.
Q3) Name of Test Agency who approved it if anyone different.
Q4) Are these test reports part of ARAI and valid for sale in India ?
Can anyone can help dig up some answers ?
https://www.araiindia.com/faqs_aype_...ertificate.asp

A stone wall.

The type approval report is given to the manufacturer who holds its distribution rights. The ARAI cannot share it with anyone else.
honeybee is offline   (10) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2018, 11:51   #367
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NCR
Posts: 8
Thanked: 22 Times
Default Re: XUV500: Severe crash, but not a single airbag deployed (driver injured)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bhpfaninblr View Post
Whatever happened to arvindb4?
No news from him or about his son. Is anyone in touch with him? Hope things are fine at his end. He has suddenly gone silent.

If anyone is in touch with him, please update this thread
Amongst other things Arvind is busy attending to Madhav,who only last week had to undergo a neuro surgery for the third time.
Madhav has since been discharged and awaits removal of stitches,while undergoing Physio and speech therapy as part of his rehab.

Last edited by Eddy : 13th August 2018 at 12:13. Reason: Please use the "Contact Us" form for any clarification on moderator actions. Thanks
Cavalier is offline   (19) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 15th August 2018, 01:00   #368
BHPian
 
Vigkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 675
Thanked: 1,167 Times
Default Re: XUV500: Severe crash, but not a single airbag deployed (driver injured)

I have been following this thread since the day 1 and have gone through each and every post.

My thoughts align with the majority of BHP-ians - At least the side airbags should have deployed. This is not a rollover case and there was multiple side impacts. Even the front impact seems to be major - But as pointed out, it might be an impact "not suitable" enough to deploy airbags.

On the other hand, I have 2 questions. Would be great if I can get the answers - that will help me form a Point of View. I do not want to form an opinion just by going through the information provided.
  1. This question was asked by MANY members. However, the OP who has responded to many individual posts has missed answering this one. May be he does not have a clear information on this and hence refrained from posting - There was a recall related to airbag deployment software - did this car go through the recall procedure and get the software updated? If not, is it fair to assume that Mahindra w(sh)ould have done the update during a regular service? What is the implication if the software was not updated? Could that possibly have caused the presumed error in airbag deployment?

  2. Will airbags deploy if the vehicle engine is switched off, but is ignition on? I am not sure of the exact specs of the 2013 XUV W8 - but immaterial of it having a push button start or key start - in case of an accident, if the vehicle turns off, it should still be in ignition ON. Now, I might be speculating and pardon me for that. Is it remotely possible that the engine got switched off as a result of the initial impact and the rest of the side impact was due to the momentum and inertia of motion while the engine was off. Will such a scenario still induce airbag deployments?
Vigkey is offline   (2) Thanks Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Global NCAP: Renault Duster scores 0 stars without airbag, 3 stars with airbag RSR Road Safety 60 29th May 2017 08:45
Mahindra XUV500 W8: Severe topple, but Side Airbags didn't deploy! glenmz Road Safety 129 5th September 2015 22:20
Toyota Etios airbags not deployed on accident psankar The Indian Car Scene 16 20th November 2014 17:44
Lamborghini LP 550-2 Balboni accident. Driver dead, cyclist badly injured Anand123 Road Safety 146 23rd February 2012 09:37
Clarkson injured in head-on crash Amien The International Automotive Scene 24 14th October 2008 18:40


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 09:43.

Copyright 2000 - 2018, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks