| |||||||
| Register | BHP Garage | Classifieds | Team-BHP FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Sedans Indigo, City, Fiesta, Octavia etc. |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #31 (permalink) | |||
| Newbie Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: bangalore
Posts: 18
| Quote:
Quote:
![]() Even if I give you my wallet, I'll have a new confusion. Should my cart have two bullocks or four? :-)Quote: Thanks for so many responses. This community is incredibly enthu. A lot of responses suggest Accord or CRV. How does the gadgetry compare between these two cars? Last edited by tsk1979 : 23rd May 2008 at 11:55. | |||
| | |
| | #34 (permalink) |
| Senior - BHPian | I would recommend Accord as you would be at the back seat. Lot of space, comfortable ride and great power. The handling and build quality have improved compared to the previous version. You will have to compromise on the gadget front. Last edited by PatienceWins : 23rd May 2008 at 12:08. |
| | |
| | #35 (permalink) | |
| Newbie Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Delhi
Posts: 43
Infractions: 0/1 (4) | Quote:
Considering your options 1. Octavia RS is a great car but its dated , i THINK that its not available now, and also its back seat is not as comfortable as other sedans , as ive experienced myself. 2. Laura vRS - I dont have any idea when will it'll be launched or will it happen , and not point considering as already you have delayed it , no point delaying it further. 3. Passsat - I personally dont like its styling and since its for 26 lac , this choice is also eliminated. so I think your choice narrows down to Accord and CRV. Though honda's have good handling , but build quality of skoda is little better . For direct comparison 1. Handling - Accord might score better as it has lower centre of gravity. 2. Acceleration - 7th gen accord was faster than CRV , so the new one is also expected to be faster , but 0-100 of CRV is also respectable at 11 sec roughly, and is more than adequate. 3. Highway presence - CRV scores big on this part 4. Cornering - Ofcourse , accord again for lower centre of gravity. I personally feel, accord is more suitable for you as you'll be sitting mostly on the back seat and its equally capable car performance wise giving you what you expect as a driver and since it's an entirely new car , you always feel delighted when heads turn to see the new car. Though resale is not a prob for you , but still you can easily get big bucks for accord as all hondas have good resale value. I expect I might have helped you.
__________________ Honda City Gxi, May 2005 - 20k Maruti Alto Lxi, Oct 2005 - 16k | |
| | |
| | #38 (permalink) |
| Super-Admin | There is always something special about buying the latest car on block...the intangibles are many. This and the fact that the new Accord is a *superb* all-rounder ought to clinch the deal. To me, the bigger the car...the better. However, this may or may not be applicable to you. Test drive the Laura too.
__________________ GTO Change the way you think, and watch the world change around you.
|
| | |
| | #39 (permalink) |
| BHPian Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Pune/Bangalore
Posts: 241
| Drive the new Accord and you'll fall for it. Okay the handling isn't as sharp as the previous Accord considering it has grown in every direction but the rear seat comfort has improved by a mile now. You have access to all the goodies from the rear with stereo controls et al. It is still 'furiously fast' though, and the automatic box with manual override gets it to 100 in a shade below 10 seconds- appreciable for a executive barge. It is even quicker than the Superb- Petrol V6 that is. Edit: The Superb has a healthy dose of wood garnishing everywhere.... from door panels to the center console.
__________________ If a car doesn't allow you to toe-n-heel.. it ain't worth driving. Last edited by doomsday : 23rd May 2008 at 13:50. |
| | |
| | #40 (permalink) |
| BHPian Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: mumbai
Posts: 86
| NEW ACCORD. the best part is its less japanese, more european. the only bad part is that in terms of features, the laura is better. but then in terms of features laura is better than the mercedes c & e both. ACCORD has too many things going in its favour right now. |
| | |
| | #41 (permalink) |
| Newbie Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Faridabad
Posts: 48
| With that much money to spend, i would give the Mitsubishi Pajero also a glance. Awesome road presence, superb handling and a great heritage among cars. Its like some people are driven in their cars and some people arrive in their cars.Believe me no body messes around with a Pajero in traffic. Get a Pajero, with oversized rubber and own the road. Give it a test drive before making a decision. The Accord is a good choice but seems flimsy in terms of build quality. CRV has a very typical shape and is a fuel guzzler. SUV's may come and SUV's may go, but Pajero goes on forever. ![]()
__________________ U zoom when you vroom... |
| | |
| | #42 (permalink) |
| BHPian | CR-V would be a great choice. 2.0 engine also has good FE and is peppy too. Plus Point:- Back seat four way adjustable = comfortable for long journeys. Spacious- Do I have to say anything. Ok VERY. 6-speed gear shift(better), A/T option only in 2.4 4x4. On highway you can easily touch 200, with no vibration and believe me you wouldn't come to know until you look at the speedo. And at that speed too the car seems very much in control. Regards YOU KNOW WHO CR-V (CR-V asking you to buy CR-V)PS: I own one too.
__________________ It's easy to shoot, It's hard to SCORE!!! |
| | |
| | #44 (permalink) | |
| BHPian | Quote:
He has 20L budget, while civic is under 13, no? And accord with wooden interiors there is only CR-V left.
__________________ It's easy to shoot, It's hard to SCORE!!! | |
| | |
| | #45 (permalink) |
| BHPian Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Coimbatore
Posts: 912
| Im gonna add more confusion here. How about waiting for Civic Hybrid?? I guess it ll fall in that price range.
__________________ Remember that nobody will ever get ahead of you as long as he is kicking you in the seat of the pants. |
| | |
![]() |
« Thinking about a 2000 Lancer Automatic in Chennai EDIT : Now bought 1.8 Invex
|
Confused on used car purchase! »
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Do you buy with your heart or mind? | rangaraj | The Indian Car Scene!! | 1 | 11th November 2007 13:51 |
| Cielo Replacement Suggestions - Under Rs. 20L | vcash | Sedans | 32 | 28th May 2007 05:55 |
| 2 cars for 20L | theEnd | Sedans | 25 | 20th August 2006 19:23 |
| Help me ease my troubled mind | xentric | Sedans | 77 | 13th March 2006 15:57 |
| Mind blowing F1 stat. | Hatari | Motor-Sports!! | 13 | 2nd June 2004 22:37 |
All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 21:46.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441








Even if I give you my wallet, I'll have a new confusion. Should my cart have two bullocks or four? :-)


