| || ||Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|20th August 2008, 15:48||#16|
Senior - BHPian
Join Date: Jun 2008
Thanked: 54 Times
Saw the first Jetta on road today. It looked different and fresh. Quite well built and solid. But, yes, no road presence, certainly not worth what they are charging. See the photos below. It won't turn any head and won't even look as something so new. From front it reminds of old optra. The rear is quite impressive though. Black moulds towards the bottom of body give good lift to design. But boot protruding too much, which gives an oldish profile from side. Tail lights LCD and plastic reminds me of Chinese toys(sorry, too harsh).
Overall, looking from outside way behind the New as well as Old Accord. New Accord is a statement by it self, a real head turner, the true status symbol (for likes of me). VFM, size, style is in the Accord. Jetta if offered by GM would have been a good update of Optra and top diesel model wouldn't sell for more then 13 L.
All IMO as can't give anyone else’s opinion.
Teach them a lesson don't buy any and go for Accord petrol.
|20th August 2008, 15:55||#17|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Thanked: 9,723 Times
|20th August 2008, 16:40||#18|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Thanked: 8,930 Times
2.Laura has reputation for being very costly to maintain,jetta shares the engines so maintainance is expected to be same.
3.Interior color on laura comes accroding to color,white gets black interiors and some colors have beige.
4.Features wise Jetta misses out on sunroof and projector xenon lamps.
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Cruze LTZ vs Jetta Comfortline vs Laura Elegance||sabynag||The Indian Car Scene||118||13th January 2012 16:50|
|Jetta 1.9, Cruze 2.0, Sonata Transform 2.0 , Laura 1.9 - Need Help!!||punitkakri||Sedans||158||10th June 2010 14:03|
|VW Jetta AT or Skoda Laura L&K 2.0 AT EDIT: its The Jetta 1.9 TDi A/T||akhilesh51||Sedans||27||14th July 2009 18:20|