Go Back   Team-BHP > Under the Hood > In-Car Entertainment > Sound Off and Show Off

Sound Off and Show Off Discuss and show your ICE here

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 26th February 2008, 08:09   #16 (permalink)
Senior - BHPian
 
hydrashok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: In my Office
Posts: 2,040
Default

That is sure a long story of ICE I enjoyed going through it.

And at this rate, I don't think the story has ended yet. heh, heh.

That is one sweet HU! Will definitely look you(r HU) up when I'm in Bangy next

Enjoyyyy!
__________________
Seven are my colours
Many are my lovers
What was three will soon be two
The music will again sound pure and
true
hydrashok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th February 2008, 10:14   #17 (permalink)
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 3
Default

Hi,

That was a great experience to read. By the way

#28, "Madhu Siri" 2 nd floor, 2nd Main ITI layout..." does this ring any bell to you.

You have Team-BHP member next door
bkishore_77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th February 2008, 10:15   #18 (permalink)
Senior - BHPian
 
Bass&Trouble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bombay
Posts: 2,031
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by akbaree
These components produce excellent natural sound.

There has been a lot of discussion on bright and laid back nature of various speakers. I don’t feel this component speaker is bright. I feel that they produce extremely natural sound. In my opinion, if the set up has an ability to control mid range frequencies, one can extract the best out of these speakers.

what I have done is, thru my PEQ, I am reducing the mid range frequencies.

the sound is very natural but like its component brother, they also need some control over mid range to get best out of them.
The reason why Polk has been descirbed as bright or unnatural by some others is exactly because of this little exaggeration in the mid-high band. Which you have correctly pointed out. Their contention has also been that a more natural sounding speaker will not need any equalization to sound good.
__________________
Operator! Give me the number for 911!
Bass&Trouble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th February 2008, 10:49   #19 (permalink)
Senior - BHPian
 
gunbir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 2,194
Cool

Anant,

Any experience with external USB HDDs and the CD7100's USB features? I ask because USB makes it a bit more interesting than the P880 or 9887.
__________________
Stuck in my head - Goldspot - Rewind
gunbir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th February 2008, 21:06   #20 (permalink)
BHPian
 
maverick236's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: hyderabad
Posts: 50
Default

What a LENGTHY set up
just kidding
Forget the amount, that you had spent.. Satisfaction is the key... Anything for that.
Awesome Setup.. Congrats
maverick236 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th February 2008, 21:38   #21 (permalink)
BHPian
 
akbaree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 88
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkishore_77 View Post
Hi,

That was a great experience to read. By the way

#28, "Madhu Siri" ..." does this ring any bell to you.

You have Team-BHP member next door
Kishore, it's great to find you after a long time. Thanks for sharing your comments.

I went thru the thread that you have put for your introduction and I must say this - we stayed in the same building for more than 15 months and never went past passing social smiles.

if you are free over this weekend, please drop by. You can audition the system. Personal Message me.
akbaree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th February 2008, 22:47   #22 (permalink)
BHPian
 
akbaree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 88
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by low_bass_makker View Post
Congrats on the setup...
Thanks

Quote:
Originally Posted by low_bass_makker View Post
How did you choose the 24 db/octave slopes. Any particular reason behind it ?
Good question. I have only layman understanding about crossover slopes but I will try to share what I felt.

An easy anwer would be - I tried with various combinations from 6 db/octave to 24 d/octave. I left the crossover slope at what it is today because I liked the sound at that slope.

But...
I feel my sub is producing more accurate bass at that slope. For the full range speakers I have kept it at 18 db/octave to allow some low frequencies to trickle in. The sub and 6x9 felt like one unit at it. I tried with 24 db/octave for my 6x9 and I felt need of two subs. When I reduced to 12 db/octave I felt overlap between sub and 6x9 was little more and I did not like it. At 18 db/octave it sounded just perfect. As far as front components are concerned, I think they didn't had strict requirement to gel well with the sub. They sound excellent at 24 db/octave.

I think depending on frequency responses of two drivers, the slope requirements between them will differ. Moreover I also think that crossover point is important factor affecting crossover slope selection.

Last edited by akbaree : 26th February 2008 at 22:48.
akbaree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th February 2008, 23:19   #23 (permalink)
BHPian
 
akbaree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 88
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gunbir View Post
Anant,

Any experience with external USB HDDs and the CD7100's USB features? I ask because USB makes it a bit more interesting than the P880 or 9887.
The access is fast. Folder/File search is quite good. Track can be changed by selecting left/right buttons. Folder can be changed by selecting up/down buttons. The HU displays all information stored in ID3v1/ID3v2 tags. I really like the rotary search function. At a click of a button the screen displays three rows. One in the forefront (center row) and two in the background. The center row shows the present song (along with track # and folder #). Volume knob can be rotated/used for quick selection. A small scrollbar on the right is very helpful to know where the present selection is in the whole list.

However during search (using rotary function or otherwise) the HU only display the physical file names (e.g. abcdef~1.mp3) . I am not sure if other HUs have the ability to use tags to search. I would have liked if the HU can display title from the ID3v1/ID3v2 tags for searching.

I am not sure if you have any specific questions.
akbaree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th February 2008, 00:09   #24 (permalink)
BHPian
 
akbaree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 88
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bass&Trouble View Post
The reason why Polk has been descirbed as bright or unnatural by some others is exactly because of this little exaggeration in the mid-high band. Which you have correctly pointed out.
With you clarifying what others meant when they described Polk Momo as bright, I feel good. Good about my ear. I can trust my ear more now.

I have agreed in my post that I feel some equalization over mid range frequencies is required to derive best out of these speakers/components. But they sound very good even without equalization.


Statement 1: Polk is bright
Statement 2: Polk has little exaggeration in the mid-high band

I feel, Statement 1, will make very different perception about the product then Statement 2. Moreover they are remarkable at producing bass, mid bass and highs. The strength and stability.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bass&Trouble View Post
Their contention has also been that a more natural sounding speaker will not need any equalization
Why do we have equalization?
Isn't it natural for human ear to be more sensitive to frequencies at which Polk Momo's appear a little aggresive?


I am no Polk salesman. I have tried sharing strengths of the product that I chose to buy.

Last edited by akbaree : 27th February 2008 at 00:10.
akbaree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th February 2008, 08:58   #25 (permalink)
Team-BHP Moderator
 
navin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: mumbai
Posts: 11,788
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bass&Trouble View Post

The reason why Polk has been descirbed as bright or unnatural by some others is exactly because of this little exaggeration in the mid-high band. Which you have correctly pointed out. Their contention has also been that a more natural sounding speaker will not need any equalization to sound good.
For anyone familiar with "Mellisa" this is quite easy to fix. Obviously "The Man in the Lab Coat" prefers his sound this way.

Disclaimer: I once (somewhere in '87) tested a pair of Polk SDA SRS for dynamic range and found it wanting. Replacing the woofers with Peerless TP165R (the Polk tweeters were Peerless KO10DT) helped. Please keep in mind that my reference bass bin then was a Jpair of BL B460. Polk at that time use to source their drivers from Peerless so I am not sure why they did not use the 165R woofer instead of the 165F that they used. Peerless's retail price was the almost the same.
__________________
Scixelsyd Etinu

Last edited by navin : 27th February 2008 at 09:06.
navin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2008, 08:56   #26 (permalink)
BHPian
 
blueraven316's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 917
Default

As far as I can say from some tuning sessions that this head unit is a really neat sounding one, with a lot of features to play with which can remarkably improve the sound on any good Audio setup.
The Polk speakers sound a lot better than I have ever heard on this player, though I myself have istalled many but I am not a big fan of Polk speakers, but at the same time I do beleive they are good but there is better available in their price range, but like that there is always something better and the upgrades go on and on and on..............
I feel anant should enjoy the speakers to the max for some time before he decides any further upgrades, the next step would be like JL Audio or Image Dynamics on those amps.
blueraven316 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2008, 10:40   #27 (permalink)
Team-BHP Moderator
 
navin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: mumbai
Posts: 11,788
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blueraven316 View Post
..but I am not a big fan of Polk speakers, but at the same time I do beleive they are good but there is better available in their price range...
I feel anant should enjoy the speakers to the max for some time before he decides any further upgrades..
Raven,
what dont you like about Polk? I have noticed that this boost in the upper mids (around 3K) started creeeping in just after their SDA models died out (1990). My guess is that they did it so that they could fudge their sensitivity figures (guys, many manufacturers do things like this so it is not something personal against Polk). Another theory is that Polk's polyamide dome exibhits some resonances that are not filtered out. Till 1990 their top components were 3 way and one did not notice this.

I do agree that Anant should enjoy his speakers. The anamolies mentioned above are pretty easy to fix.
__________________
Scixelsyd Etinu
navin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2008, 14:53   #28 (permalink)
BHPian
 
blueraven316's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 917
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by navin View Post
Raven,
what dont you like about Polk? I have noticed that this boost in the upper mids (around 3K) started creeeping in just after their SDA models died out (1990). My guess is that they did it so that they could fudge their sensitivity figures

I do agree that Anant should enjoy his speakers. The anamolies mentioned above are pretty easy to fix.
What you said is spot on, From whatever little I have seen Polk speakers can sound really bad with some little mistakes in amp tuning and source unit settings.
One of the reasons why many people feel that Polk speakers are horribly bright as they probably have not seen them setup really well.

I am not a big fan of those speakers, though I do like loudness and strength in speakers but at the same time it needs to be versatile in ways it can be tuned and still sound nice, that adds a lot more life into any speaker sound.

OT : What is your opinion on the Rockford Punch component speakers post 05' ? I am asking you this as you have seen and heard a lot more speakers than I have.
blueraven316 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2008, 20:48   #29 (permalink)
BHPian
 
akbaree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 88
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by navin View Post

I have noticed that this boost in the upper mids (around 3K) started creeeping in just after their SDA models died out (1990). My guess is that they did it so that they could fudge their sensitivity figures (guys, many manufacturers do things like this so it is not something personal against Polk). Another theory is that Polk's polyamide dome exibhits some resonances that are not filtered out.

The anamolies mentioned above are pretty easy to fix.
Quote:
Originally Posted by navin View Post
For anyone familiar with "Mellisa" this is quite easy to fix. Obviously "The Man in the Lab Coat" prefers his sound this way.
Navin, as always, your posts make me feel that I am living in some 17th century and you are from the 21st century. I tried looking up "Mellisa" on google, and could not find anything.

Would you mind telling me in more simpler way. I would like to try and fix these anomalies and would be in a position to better appreciate this.

Is this something that I can do?
Is equalizing a good solution?
akbaree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th February 2008, 09:51   #30 (permalink)
Team-BHP Moderator
 
DerAlte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,623
Default

Arey arey @akbaree-bhai, don't take that to heart.

Google "MLSSA" (you are not reading wide enough on TBHP - you missed the Melissa humour on another thread, about Melissa and @bass&trouble).
__________________
Never believe it cannot be done - it's only that you haven't found out how!!!
DerAlte is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Analysis of my car's honking sound svaid Technical Stuff 11 5th November 2007 11:24
What was your car's actual resale? yeis The Indian Car Scene!! 15 9th August 2006 14:02
Physics behind car's movement sbasak Technical Stuff 44 4th June 2006 18:56
Car's Spotted in Bangladesh GTI WR6 The International Automotive Scene 15 18th August 2005 08:48


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 22:52.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Team-BHP.comAd Management by RedTyger

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430