Go Back   Team-BHP > Buckle Up > Street Experiences


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 4th July 2017, 17:25   #271
BHPian
 
avira_tk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 647
Thanked: 614 Times
Default Re: Come April 2017, no more Liquor shops on the highway!

Quote:
Originally Posted by sgiitk View Post
I think we are missing the main point. We, as a nation, are unable to drink responsibly. So in the interest of safety alcohol at or around highways MUST be banned. Our enforcement mechanism is also bent!
Come on, that's just going overboard. We have too little enforcement, urban drunk driving has decreased specifically because of those who do it are heavily penalised.

There are plenty of people who drink responsibly, banning something with no thought to the extent of the damage shows the extent of the disconnect. Its very easy to pontificate when you have no skin in the game.

The main point is that we have excelled in throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
avira_tk is offline   (5) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2017, 20:42   #272
BHPian
 
djpeesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 599
Thanked: 735 Times
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sgiitk View Post
I think we are missing the main point. We, as a nation, are unable to drink responsibly. So in the interest of safety alcohol at or around highways MUST be banned. Our enforcement mechanism is also bent!
We as a nation have failed to stop crimes against women. What can we ban for that?

There are absolutely no shortcuts to dealing with the elephant in the room - law enforcement. The sooner we accept that the police forces in most states have failed, the easier it will be to put the country back on track.
djpeesh is offline   (6) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2017, 00:43   #273
BHPian
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Lucknow
Posts: 35
Thanked: 36 Times
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djpeesh View Post
We as a nation have failed to stop crimes against women. What can we ban for that?

There are absolutely no shortcuts to dealing with the elephant in the room - law enforcement. The sooner we accept that the police forces in most states have failed, the easier it will be to put the country back on track.

Truer words have never been spoken. Law enforcement is the single point of failure in our system. I believe everyone wants to follow the law. No one wants unnecessary hassles in their lives. But when they see that the guards of the society are themselves not interested, people can't help but test the boundaries of the law.

We Indians have become masters at taking the easy way out. Be it anywhere.

(Sorry if I sound wrong)
Stratosphere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2017, 07:49   #274
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pune
Posts: 2,346
Thanked: 1,004 Times
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by avira_tk View Post
Its very easy to pontificate when you have no skin in the game.

The main point is that we have excelled in throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
I agree. And the SC is more guilty than most given its exalted position, so they can now only get respect by threatening contempt of court, as in a farcical play.

Today's shocking news: A bench consisting of the CJI has said yesterday that highways within city limits could be considered as internal or district roads. That the ban was meant to ensure that alcohol was not available to drivers plying on fast moving highways, not those passing through cities. So why did they not say this in their decree?

Hold them accountable to pay for the mess caused by ill considered ivory tower decrees laid down by the SC itself then. But no, they are above all of us and exempt from accountability themselves. More banana republic behaviour, this.

Our problem isn't just enforcement; it also too many silly rules made by idiots, even English ones from before 1947. So that even the good rules can't be enforced because of diffused efforts.

Less rules, and more enforcement is what we need, but who is bothered about effectiveness? The more the rules, the more the opportunity for corruption.

Edit:
Some lawyers here ought to know: if all the hotels and bars now file a joint claim against the specific judges that made this not fully thought out decree, for compensation for loss of business of what must be amounting to over a hundred crores by now, will it be a claim that can be enforced under law?
If not, why not?

Last edited by noopster : 5th July 2017 at 08:34. Reason: Merged the edit in
Sawyer is offline   (4) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2017, 14:09   #275
BHPian
 
DriverR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 317
Thanked: 145 Times
Default Re: Come April 2017, no more Liquor shops on the highway!

Impact of the ban

Liqour ban along highways: UP suffers Rs 5,000 crore loss

Quote:
The Uttar Pradesh government has incurred a loss of about Rs 5,000 crore following the Supreme Court order banning all liquor shops along national as well as state highways.
Of the 8,591 highway liquor shops affected by the Supreme Court order, 2,000 are yet to be relocated while 3,000 shop owners have surrendered their liquor licences.
It would be good to see what has been the number of road accidents for the same time period.
DriverR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2017, 10:11   #276
Distinguished - BHPian
 
sgiitk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Kanpur
Posts: 7,042
Thanked: 3,586 Times
Default Re: Come April 2017, no more Liquor shops on the highway!

Quote:
Originally Posted by TorqueyTechie View Post
Supreme court today has said that the government can denotify roads inside cities as highways and allow bars to run. This move will benefit many state governments as it had caused lot of grievances to both the state exchequer as well as the owners, workers in the industry.
By the looks of it, the SCI recognizes that this was an unexpected effect of their ruling. More important they are willing to amend it.
sgiitk is offline   (1) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2017, 10:51   #277
BHPian
 
GeneralJazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: KL-58/KL-07
Posts: 102
Thanked: 208 Times
Default Re: Come April 2017, no more Liquor shops on the highway!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sawyer View Post
Some lawyers here ought to know: if all the hotels and bars now file a joint claim against the specific judges that made this not fully thought out decree, for compensation for loss of business of what must be amounting to over a hundred crores by now, will it be a claim that can be enforced under law?
If not, why not?
I don't think anything can be done about that. From what I read, the only action that can be taken against higher court judges is impeachment. And that's impractical.

I think this article is provides some info on this:

https://ccs.in/internship_papers/201...sha-tirkey.pdf
GeneralJazz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2017, 11:45   #278
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pune
Posts: 2,346
Thanked: 1,004 Times
Default Re: Come April 2017, no more Liquor shops on the highway!

Interesting, and it says how the judiciary has to be independent of the executive and legislature. And that a FIR cannot be filed against a judge - what if the judge is a murder suspect though?

The article also says this: "The main task of judiciary is to dispense speedy justice and bring relief to the litigant".

But when the judges make decrees that have nothing do with the above, and when their boss essentially says that the decree was not fully thought through, why are these judges exempt from bearing the responsibility for commercial losses suffered by the people of India by their not thinking things through? Setting aside the question that this is none of their business in the first place. But if they choose to make it so, they should also be responsible for commercial losses suffered when they make mistakes. As we do.

If a class action suit or some such is filed here for commercial damages, it would be an excellent thing that would bring this subject to the fore. Not all public interest litigation needs be directed against the Government. Why not against judges?

Of course the SC will then bring a contempt of court charge against those filing such a case.
Sawyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Smuggling: Imported Tyres being stuffed with cigarettes & liquor! GTO Tyre & Alloy wheel Section 7 19th September 2014 10:55


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 22:42.

Copyright 2000 - 2017, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks