Go Back   Team-BHP > Under the Hood > Technical Stuff

Technical Stuff Want to know your Vtec, ABS or intercooling better?


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 3rd January 2007, 12:11   #1 (permalink)
BHPian
 
narayan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: gurgaon
Posts: 638
Question Ohc 1.5 Vs Ohc Vtec

i own a 2001 ohc 1.5.
on every forum, auto mags, i come across rave views on the OHC VTEC. but somehow the 1.5 is not discussed in the same vein. in paper there is a 6 bhp diff. ive NEVER driven a VTEC. can some one say what exactly is the practical diff betn the 1.5 AND THE VTEC in terms of

1) acceleration times - 0-60 and 0-100
2) ride, handling - if any bcos of the diff in the shoes they wear
3) any other diff in mechanicals ? - like springs, exhaust etc ?

im really depressed by the fact that the 1.5 is always the underdog when compared to the VTEC for just that 6 BHP shortfall ( even considering putting a VTEC logo on the bumper
narayan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2007, 13:54   #2 (permalink)
GTO
Super-Admin
 
GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bombay
Posts: 12,185
Default

As a Vtec owner and fan, the performance difference between a 1.5 and the Vtec is not that much.

But theres somethings in life that you just cant explain. And the Vtec just makes you feel more special.
__________________
GTO

Change the way you think, and watch the world change around you.
  • Please don't PM for support. Use the Contact Form instead.
  • Please read the *NEW* Team-BHP FAQ section for all your queries.
GTO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2007, 13:55   #3 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 93
Default

VTECH Stands for "Variable valve Timing and lift Electronic Control", It's not just the logo on the bumper, It means a cutting edge technology powering your engines valves.
Here is the Anlology, You have a bucket of water, an empty bucket and small cup to transfer water from the filled one to the empty one.
To Increase the efficiency of water transfer you can use the following methods
1. Increase the size of the small cup thus by increasing the amount of water transferred.
2. You can move the cup faster between the buckets so that the work done is more.
Honda choose the later method, rotate the engine faster to produce more power, But there is a problem with this method at lower RPM's the engine guzzles up more fuel to produce the required costant power which is completely against HONDS's design, so they came up with VTECH.

If high speed operation is all we have to worry about, Honda wouldn't need to implement VTEC. Indeed, race engines that operate mostly at high rpms do not utilize any mechanism like VTEC. But street cars used for daily driving spend most of their time with the engine at low RPMs. Valves that open wide for high RPM operation contributes to rough operation and poor fuel economy at low RPMs. These undesirable traits are directly against Honda's design goals.
The solution that Honda came up with is the VTEC mechanism: open the valves nice and wide at high RPMs, but open them not as much at low RPMs. So now you have a engine with smooth operation at low RPMs, and high power output at high RPMs.
Hope you got the difference, in VTECH the camshaft is moved during operation as the RPM of the engine increases, this is done by using the oil presure inside the engine. So in VTECH the engine RPM desides how much the inlet and exhaust valves open.
Regards,
Mega
--Inspired By HONDA VTECH technology...
mega5918 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2007, 14:11   #4 (permalink)
Distinguished - BHPian
 
iraghava's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bhaiyyaland
Posts: 7,332
Default

The difference is more power, more torque, higher redline etc. The performance difference is 1.5 - 0-100 in 11.5 or so seconds and VTEC in 10.01 seconds (I'm pretty sure but could be wrong considering I read the test 5-6 years back)
__________________
There is a very fine line between "Hobby" and "Mental Illness".
iraghava is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2007, 14:40   #5 (permalink)
Team-BHP Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 5,213
Default

Power difference may not seem much but the character of the cars are very different. Ishan has mentioned why in above post
__________________
I love the whoosh, but i miss the bellowing
ajmat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2007, 14:47   #6 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 818
Default

Superb explanation mega5918 !!! I loved it !!
__________________
Long Live Schumacher !! The greatest there ever was or there ever will be !!

Exams suck !!
Nikhilb2008 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2007, 15:51   #7 (permalink)
BHPian
 
narayan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: gurgaon
Posts: 638
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iraghava View Post
The difference is more power, more torque, higher redline etc. The performance difference is 1.5 - 0-100 in 11.5 or so seconds and VTEC in 10.01 seconds (I'm pretty sure but could be wrong considering I read the test 5-6 years back)

does the 6bhp make such a big diff in 0-100 ?!! ( im depressed !)
are there any other differences ? like mechanicals, handling etc..VTEC owners - pls add in
narayan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2007, 15:59   #8 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Pankaj401's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Phoenix, US
Posts: 184
Default

Quote:
VTECH Stands for ...
Quote:
--Inspired By HONDA VTECH technology...
It was always VTEC. Everyday I see new spelling! Ah!
Pankaj401 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2007, 16:12   #9 (permalink)
BHPian
 
narayan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: gurgaon
Posts: 638
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mega5918 View Post
VTECH Stands for "Variable valve Timing and lift Electronic Control", It's not just the logo on the bumper, It means a cutting edge technology powering your engines valves.
Here is the Anlology, You have a bucket of water, an empty bucket and small cup to transfer water from the filled one to the empty one.
To Increase the efficiency of water transfer you can use the following methods
1. Increase the size of the small cup thus by increasing the amount of water transferred.
2. You can move the cup faster between the buckets so that the work done is more.
Honda choose the later method, rotate the engine faster to produce more power, But there is a problem with this method at lower RPM's the engine guzzles up more fuel to produce the required costant power which is completely against HONDS's design, so they came up with VTECH.

If high speed operation is all we have to worry about, Honda wouldn't need to implement VTEC. Indeed, race engines that operate mostly at high rpms do not utilize any mechanism like VTEC. But street cars used for daily driving spend most of their time with the engine at low RPMs. Valves that open wide for high RPM operation contributes to rough operation and poor fuel economy at low RPMs. These undesirable traits are directly against Honda's design goals.
The solution that Honda came up with is the VTEC mechanism: open the valves nice and wide at high RPMs, but open them not as much at low RPMs. So now you have a engine with smooth operation at low RPMs, and high power output at high RPMs.
Hope you got the difference, in VTECH the camshaft is moved during operation as the RPM of the engine increases, this is done by using the oil presure inside the engine. So in VTECH the engine RPM desides how much the inlet and exhaust valves open.
Regards,
Mega
--Inspired By HONDA VTECH technology...
does this make the VTEC more smooth and fuel effcient than the 1.5 ? IF SO how much is the diff in FE..

also is this the reason why the normal 1.5 is very jerky in city driving..( the lack of VTEC in an engine that typically makes most of its power higher up the rev range - i mean any shift below 2500 rpm and the gear change is def not smooth unless u play the clutch )
narayan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2007, 17:06   #10 (permalink)
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Shan2nu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hubli/Blore - Karnataka - India
Posts: 4,066
Default

You gotta drive it to understand the diff.

Stock vs stock, the Vtec is much more superior than the 6bhp diff you see on papar.

What you're seeing is the power output at one particular rpm, performance doesn't depend solely on that, the torque and power curve is what gives the car it's acceleration.

Generally, to achieve performance with FE, manufacturers use a cam profile that gives you good performance with good FE. What Vtec does is, use a sedate cam profile at low revvs, which uses less air than what a normal engine would take in (improving FE) and activates an aggressive cam profile at higher revvs, which maximises the engines air intake (increasing torque and power).

If the Vtec system is deactivated, the performance would drop drastically as the engine would run with the sedate cam profile.

Shan2nu
__________________
VTEC flyby - youtube.com/watch?v=1AhWJlVRPqE

Last edited by Shan2nu : 3rd January 2007 at 17:18.
Shan2nu is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2007, 17:24   #11 (permalink)
BHPian
 
goldie_malhotra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 684
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shan2nu View Post
If the Vtec system is deactivated, the performance would drop drastically as the engine would run with the sedate cam profile.
Shan2nu
I think the NHC iDSI model would be a good example of that.

There is little difference between the FE of the VTEC and iDSI models of the NHC, since most of the times the sedate cam profile gets used. But the wild cam profile of the VTEC gives it much better top-end power.
__________________
Too much work, too less play - seems like I need some BHP
goldie_malhotra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2007, 17:39   #12 (permalink)
Senior - BHPian
 
Surprise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chennai
Posts: 1,299
Default

MEGA 5918, that was superb. You put that down in a simpler/easier way.
Surprise is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2007, 18:41   #13 (permalink)
Distinguished - BHPian
 
DCEite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: (Gur)Gaon
Posts: 1,891
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mega5918 View Post
VTECH Stands for "Variable valve Timing and lift Electronic Control"
I really admire your post.

BUT... the 'H' was not needed.
DCEite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2007, 19:17   #14 (permalink)
Team-BHP Moderator
 
Mpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago/B'lore
Posts: 3,668
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mega5918 View Post
Hope you got the difference, in VTECH the camshaft is moved during operation as the RPM of the engine increases, this is done by using the oil presure inside the engine. So in VTECH the engine RPM desides how much the inlet and exhaust valves open...
The cam does not move, there is a different lobe for every stage.

BMW's valvetronic technology moves the cam.
__________________
The difference between the men and the boys....................is the speed of their toys.
Mpower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2007, 20:42   #15 (permalink)
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Ford Rocam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mumbai-India
Posts: 906
Default

Since most of the people have explained you mechanical difference between 1.5 Non Vtec & 1.5Vtec engines it actually doesnt ends there, Honda has two different Fuel/Ignitions Maps stored in ECU one for low speed CAM designed for fuel economy & one aggresive map for High speed CAm desgined for Power so when your Vtec Engages it reads from a different set of Ignition/Fuel Curve which is optimized for High Speed High duration Cam lobes. So you get best of both worlds fuel economy & power up at high RPM.
__________________
Cheap and reliable wont be fast, cheap and fast wont be reliable, reliable and fast wont be cheap.
Ford Rocam is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OHC Vtec malcolm Modifications & Accessories 81 18th February 2008 14:22
First Mods for my OHC VTEC..... adit1329 Modifications & Accessories 20 19th May 2006 13:29
wanted ohc vtec!! speed0mania Shifting gears 0 17th May 2006 01:28
NHC-Vtec or OHC Vtec..which is a better buy? sunith Sedans 4 2nd May 2006 21:25
Wanted: OHC VTEC or OHC 1.5 adit1329 Shifting gears 4 16th March 2006 17:39


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 04:13.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Team-BHP.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441