Go Back   Team-BHP > Under the Hood > Technical Stuff


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 8th July 2008, 23:23   #106
Senior - BHPian
 
iraghava's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bhaiyyaland
Posts: 8,028
Thanked: 153 Times
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedMM340 View Post
Superchargers on large V8 motors can chew up 60+ horsepower at 5000+ rpm, so are just not that efficient at high rpm.
That was partly the reason Mercedes discontinued their 5.5L Supercharged engine. It was apparently robbing them of 100 bhp at peak rpm.
iraghava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th July 2008, 01:04   #107
Senior - BHPian
 
v1p3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: BLR - chasing cars...
Posts: 4,836
Thanked: 26 Times
Default

The whole loss factor is a bit overstated. You lose 100 hp but then you're gaining a lot more from the boost. It's not so much a loss in itself, as much as it is a deduction from the power increase.

If superchargers were so inefficient, top fuel dragsters wouldn't be using them.
v1p3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th July 2008, 02:56   #108
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Mpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 10,432
Thanked: 1,682 Times
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedMM340 View Post
Plus the SC has a much high cost and as far as I know there are no SC production cars here in India. With the possible exception of Mercedes? So in an extremely price sensitive market like India, Superchargers will not proliferate. Even in the U.S., SCs have just a fraction of the marketshare of turbos
Yes. Merc offers the C200K and E200K in India and no problems with dust have been reported so far. Audi A6 for 2009 will have supercharger standard on their V6s.

With any kind of compressor clearance between impeller and housing is critical. Even in turbo's compressor the goal is to minimize the clearance between the impeller and the housing for better efficiency. In fact Nissan once designed an abradable impeller that they would artificially wear to get the absolute minimum clearance.
Mpower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2009, 18:58   #109
BHPian
 
Dante's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nasik
Posts: 374
Thanked: 16 Times
Exclamation Turbocharger Vs Supercharger

Well many of them must be knowing this but for some who don't know, stick around.

Turbocharger VS Supercharger

Let's start with the similarities. Both and superchargers are called forced induction systems. They compress the air flowing into the engine*. The advantage of compressing the air is that it lets the engine stuff more air into a cylinder. More air means that more fuel can be stuffed in, too, so you get more power from each explosion in each cylinder. A turbo/supercharged engine produces more power overall than the same engine without the charging.*
*The typical boost provided by either a turbocharger or a supercharger is 6 to 8 pounds per square inch (psi). Since normal atmospheric pressure is 14.7 psi at sea level, you can see that you are getting about 50-percent more air into the engine. Therefore, you would expect to get 50-percent more power. It's not perfectly efficient, though, so you might get a 30-percent to 40-percent improvement instead.

*The key difference between a turbocharger and a supercharger is its. Something has to supply the power to run the air compressor. In a supercharger, there is a that connects directly to the engine. It gets its power the same way that the water pump or alternator does. A turbocharger, on the other hand, gets its power from the exhaust stream. The exhaust runs through a turbine, which in turn spins the compressor. There are tradeoffs in both systems. In theory, a turbocharger is more efficient because it is using the "wasted" energy in the exhaust stream for its power source. On the other hand, a turbocharger causes some amount of back pressure in the exhaust system and tends to provide less boost until the engine is running at higher RPMs. Superchargers are easier to install but tend to be more expensive.

Note from the Team-BHP Support Staff : Do make sure that you provide the references/original source for every piece of material that has been taken from another website/publication, to give credit to the original author.

Source - HowStuffWorks "What is the difference between a turbocharger and a supercharger on a car's engine?"

Last edited by Rehaan : 19th June 2009 at 18:47. Reason: Please see the note in your post.
Dante is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2009, 19:08   #110
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Technocrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Mid West
Posts: 14,897
Thanked: 2,478 Times
Default

For more definitions on both check This Thread (A Guide On Technical Jargons)
Technocrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2009, 20:58   #111
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 94
Thanked: 10 Times
Default

There are engines that have both - at low speed supercharger works & once enough boost is created turbo comes into picture when a clutch disengages the drive!
The only problem with turbo is 'lag', going in for low inertia turbo decreases the turbo lag, but then increases the boost at high rpms beyond the limit. This is where wastegated turbocharger comes into picture. Here at high rpms/boost the exahust is let off directly to the exhaust instead of passing through turbo. VGT's are newest entries where the boost is controlled at different speeds making the turbo to be effective through most of the operating regions!
Gany is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2009, 10:32   #112
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: CHENNAI
Posts: 386
Thanked: 28 Times
Default

Folks,
Somehow i have got a feel that the Turbo in my Scorpio CRDE 2.6 is not performing optimally.
How do we check its performance? does the regular A s s set ups have some equipment to handle it?

tnx
PRADEEP KUMAR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2009, 10:34   #113
Senior - BHPian
 
iceman91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: melbourne/bangalore
Posts: 1,958
Thanked: 22 Times
Default

the Golf has a supercharger and turbo charged engine.

Pradeep wrong thread but yes you can get it checked at an A S S
iceman91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2015, 02:52   #114
BHPian
 
Kappa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Jaipur
Posts: 44
Thanked: 16 Times
Lightbulb Air Compressor as Turbo?

Hello! I was wondering on this for quite a long time. The challenges we face today, regarding turbochargers in our cars (like turbo-lag etc.) are something which give the petrol cars an edge over the turbocharged diesel ones, and also make the petrol motors the better choice for us petrolheads.

But wait, what if we use an air-compressor(air pump) for the purpose of forced induction, instead of the traditional exhaust gas driven turbine-based turbocharger? The compressor could be fitted at the air intake of the vehicle, attached to a dedicated micro-computer which monitors and adjusts the power of the compressor in real time, based on the requirement of air by the engine, which would further depend on the throttle input by the driver. And regarding the problem of the energy that could be used up by the compressor, regenerative braking could help us here. The energy wasted by the vehicle could be saved and be made available for use, which shall be used exclusively by the compressor, thus freeing up the engine from any extra loads. This can greatly benefit us during city traffic conditions as we tend to brake a lot while under heavy traffic.

This way, the problems like low rpm turbo-lag can be solved, and will make the turbo'd diesel engines quite versatile - torquey, fuel efficient, plus no turbo lags!
And yes, this idea should work not only for the diesel engines, but also for the modern turbocharged petrol engines like the Ford Ecoboost, VWAG's TSI engines etc.

So, what do you think ?

Last edited by Kappa : 25th February 2015 at 02:57.
Kappa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2015, 03:05   #115
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: India
Posts: 9,359
Thanked: 13,315 Times
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kappa View Post
But wait, what if we use an air-compressor (air pump) for the purpose of forced induction, instead of the traditional exhaust gas driven turbine-based turbocharger?
Just a thought - Will the 'Air Pump' be able to hold on to the boost in power that will be generated?! Varying load condition? heat generated? sustained high RPM's?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kappa View Post
This way, the problems like low rpm turbo-lag can be solved, and will make the turbo'd diesel engines quite versatile - torquey, fuel efficient, plus no turbo lags!
If the low-end driving is the issue, add another smaller capacity turbo for lower RPM effectiveness and for regular highway ones keep the regular turbo in place. 2 turbo's will do it!

Why not a Super charger?!
a4anurag is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2015, 04:03   #116
Distinguished - BHPian
 
CrAzY dRiVeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bangalore / TVM
Posts: 8,947
Thanked: 16,652 Times
Default Air Compressor as Turbo?

What you are talking about is essentially a super charger. And you have mentioned the disadvantage yourself - it saps energy.

Regenerative braking might give you back some of that energy but it doesn't prevent the wastage of energy and pushes the costs higher up, now doesn't it?

Also- turbo lag can be enjoyable as well, depending on the tuning. Cars like the original Swift DDiS, Cruze VCDi were all known to be more enjoyable when they had turbo lag followed by a grin inducing boost. Not the case for cars like Corolla D4D, original Renault Fluence etc where the boost is actually required to get the car moving, forget having fun with it.

PS- In my personal opinion, I think NA petrols have lost the edge they once had over diesels. Modern diesels are not only fast, but very efficient as well compared to their NA petrol counterparts. Also, if the diesel suffers from turbo lag- the NA petrol suffers from weak low end torque. However, give me a turbo petrol like the 1.4 TJet or the 1.8 TSi- then we are talking!

Last edited by CrAzY dRiVeR : 25th February 2015 at 04:18.
CrAzY dRiVeR is offline   (3) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2015, 05:37   #117
Senior - BHPian
 
rajeev k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Emerging Metro
Posts: 3,306
Thanked: 1,730 Times
Default Re: Air Compressor as Turbo?

Turbochargers are also, sort of air compressors. The centrifugal air compressors are exactly the same. These also runs at much higher rpm and are highly efficient and consumes much lesser power.

Today almost all major industries are going in for centrifugal compressors to meet their compressed air requirement.

Centrifugal gas compressors were used since a long time in Fertilizer and Petrochemical industries for compressing syn-gas and other gases.
Air and Gas compressors are multistage and quite big, whereas Turbochargers are smaller.

Last edited by rajeev k : 25th February 2015 at 05:39.
rajeev k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2015, 10:50   #118
Distinguished - BHPian
 
dhanushs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bathery/BLR
Posts: 3,446
Thanked: 4,055 Times
Default Re: Air Compressor as Turbo?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kappa View Post
This way, the problems like low rpm turbo-lag can be solved, and will make the turbo'd diesel engines quite versatile - torquey, fuel efficient, plus no turbo lags!
And yes, this idea should work not only for the diesel engines, but also for the modern turbocharged petrol engines like the Ford Ecoboost, VWAG's TSI engines etc.

So, what do you think ?
The turbo lag problem was solved as soon as it was implemented, AFAIK (Twin turbo, VGT etc. etc.) . However, the issue was to implement it in common, day to day use cars, which needed cost effectiveness and fuel efficiency.

The Air Pump that you mention here, is basically a electrically driven supercharger. Usually, which are belt driven by the crank pulley.

Google Superchargers Vs Turbochargers to get more info regarding this topic.
dhanushs is offline   (1) Thanks Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2015, 11:09   #119
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 320
Thanked: 213 Times
Default Re: Air Compressor as Turbo?

The speed of a supercharger which is engine driven or a turbocharger which is driven by the exhaust gas varies with the speed of the engine. With an air pump, it will be extremely difficult to control the amount of air being supplied to the engine intake. Needless to say, the exhaust emission will vary significantly and most probably not comply with BS IV or later versions.

Even if you can accurately vary the flow of air into the intake depending on engine speed, you will utilize a fair amount of power (and therefore fuel) for operating the air pump.

One crazy idea is to have a compressed air tank and connect a line to the engine intake through a valve, the opening of which can be connected to the throttle/accelerator pedal
rpunwani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2015, 12:54   #120
Team-BHP Support
 
.anshuman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Good-Gaon
Posts: 7,708
Thanked: 8,929 Times
Default Re: Air Compressor as Turbo?

Audi is working on such a system. The RS5 TDI prototype with 3.0 TDI engine gets a 48v electrically driven Supercharger, which provides initial boost till the Turbocharger spools up and takes over from there on.

Which is more effective Turbocharger or Supercharger ?-audi3.0literv6dieselenginewithelectricturbocharger201.jpg

Picture Source.
.anshuman is offline   (1) Thanks Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mercedes Benz C230, supercharger ideas wishlist Super-Cars & Imports in India 5 23rd February 2010 18:50
Cheated by Tuners Inc (won't give me my supercharger!) v1p3r Shifting gears 16 25th November 2009 11:34
Supercharger upgrade for Palio maruthi Modifications & Accessories 45 17th May 2007 06:01
LOL! Mkt Head Ferrari claims Indian Octavia with Quad cam,Turbo,Supercharger,7 Speed mktgheadferrari The Indian Car Scene 44 7th March 2006 10:14
Supercharger or turbocharger? sridhar24 Technical Stuff 1 22nd September 2004 11:13


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 04:20.

Copyright 2000 - 2017, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks