Go Back   Team-BHP > Under the Hood > Technical Stuff

Technical Stuff Want to know your Vtec, ABS or intercooling better?


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 18th September 2007, 09:12   #61 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: pune
Posts: 245
Default thanks !

thanks a lot man ,
u made my day!
Quote:
Originally Posted by finetuning View Post
Hi TURBOSAM,

I agree with Ricky_63 about pleasure in reading your post.I do feel that it comes from direct experience and sharing without any expectation.I too felt many times the depth of the subject presented in a very simple way.I appreciate your effort.
TURBOSAM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2007, 09:25   #62 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: pune
Posts: 245
Default about thinner oil

Note from the Team-BHP Support : Please type in full and proper english, with the correct use of punctuation. SMS / Slang / Short-form typing is strictly prohibited on Team-BHP.

hi
we can go for sinthetic oil for better protection and slightly better fuel efficiency
5- w 50 or 10 w 50 is recomanded if u belive in fill it forget it for next 10 k kms
if u put 0 w 40 oil its still better but the problem is it evaporates very fast @ 500-1000 ml/10000kms.
u can definately top up the oil but the lighter fractions which evaporate in the sump and engine ,settle down in the throttle bodies,stepper motors, the planum chamber,tuned length ports inlet ports,inlet valves,and temp and pressure sensors, they may block the vacuum lines if its used somewhere else apart from brake booster<it has a non return valve working in opposite direction, so no probs>as now a days all the crank case vapours are circulated and and consumed by the engines . SO UNLESS AND UNTILL U ARE TOO KEEN ON CLEENING THEM ON REGULAR INTERVALS ... STAY AWAY FROM MOBIL OW40<OR EQUIVALENT>though its still the horsepower boss!!!

Last edited by GTO : 18th September 2007 at 10:25.
TURBOSAM is offline   Reply With Quote Received Infraction
Old 18th September 2007, 09:46   #63 (permalink)
BHPian
 
vivekiny2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Loveland, OH (cincinnati area), jabalpur, chennai
Posts: 662
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TURBOSAM View Post
if handlng and grip is not imp plus if u are ready to accept a bit noisey and a bit of harsher ride then, tyres inflated to the max- 1 to-2 psi recomanded by the tyre manufacturer will give you @ 5-15% more distance per lit . apard from lesser rolling resiestence, the tyre will deflect lesser so EFFECTIVE rolling radious will be more by @ 5-7% this difference will NOT show on the guage as number of revolutions will be translated in kms covered but when meter says 100 kms actually u have travelled 105 +kms as with larger radius, u will be needing lesser revolutions to cover the same distence .
its as god as fitting taller tyres ..
whoa, any basis for these numbers?

i really doubt. 1-2 PSi more means 5-7 % higher radius???? we are talking about tires, not baloons. Irags, where art thou?

and you assume that a litre will get you same number of revoltuions with larger tires? what about extra torque the engine will need to handle?
__________________
______________________________________
with great power, comes great responsibility.

bigger the car, longer the cleaning time.
vivekiny2k is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2007, 10:05   #64 (permalink)
BHPian
 
vivekiny2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Loveland, OH (cincinnati area), jabalpur, chennai
Posts: 662
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by srishiva View Post
Windows rolled down with no AC is better than AC with windows up. AAA in U.S recommends this and its tried and tested.
not really, look at test #4.

We Test the Tips
__________________
______________________________________
with great power, comes great responsibility.

bigger the car, longer the cleaning time.
vivekiny2k is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2007, 12:15   #65 (permalink)
BHPian
 
sathya_nars's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 569
Default

Thanks all (especially TURBOSAM) for more detailed answers to my query.
sathya_nars is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2007, 09:18   #66 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: pune
Posts: 245
Default hi

if u read it carefully i said 1- to -2 psi less than max pressure allowed by the tyre manufecturer.
its not 1-2 psi more its generally 8to 10 psi more.
the radial ply tyres have very soft side wall which deforms a lot with load<and causes extra heat too thats why its recomanded to pump up the tyres before hittying express highway>
the drop in rolling resistence will nearly compensate the increase in torque requirement and if u still have doubts then measure the height at 28 psi and 38 psi do the calculations 2*pai*radius .
easies than that.. try yourselves with one tank full test .
Quote:
Originally Posted by vivekiny2k View Post
whoa, any basis for these numbers?

i really doubt. 1-2 PSi more means 5-7 % higher radius???? we are talking about tires, not baloons. Irags, where art thou?

and you assume that a litre will get you same number of revoltuions with larger tires? what about extra torque the engine will need to handle?

Last edited by TURBOSAM : 19th September 2007 at 09:21.
TURBOSAM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2007, 09:41   #67 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: pune
Posts: 245
Default hi!

you are always welcome man!
Quote:
Originally Posted by sathya_nars View Post
Thanks all (especially TURBOSAM) for more detailed answers to my query.
TURBOSAM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2007, 09:45   #68 (permalink)
BHPian
 
vivekiny2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Loveland, OH (cincinnati area), jabalpur, chennai
Posts: 662
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TURBOSAM View Post
if u read it carefully i said 1- to -2 psi less than max pressure allowed by the tyre manufecturer.
its not 1-2 psi more its generally 8to 10 psi more.
I have observed a difference of upto 4 psi in my car in cold and running pressures.

if I put 1-2 psi less than max, in running it will be more than the max allowed. Are you sure you want to advise others of exceeding manufacturers limit on tyres?

you are talking about an extreme which i have never tried, and I personally suggest you to refrain from testing such measures for a gain in mileage. I won't want to see my tires deformed to such an extent. i would rather have bigger tires to reduce rolling resistance.

safety first bro! any mileage gain is not worth bursting tires on highway.

in spite of all that, I would be interested to see where did you see this data, since you have quoted hard numbers.
__________________
______________________________________
with great power, comes great responsibility.

bigger the car, longer the cleaning time.

Last edited by vivekiny2k : 19th September 2007 at 09:46.
vivekiny2k is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2007, 09:57   #69 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: pune
Posts: 245
Default crank case vacuum!

if the engine is 1600 cc, if u are idling the car its consuming close to 10% of 1600 cc of capacity BUT its churning 1600 cc air within the engine plus the air in the crank case and sump .
it costs power to rotate something like 4 pistons ,4 con rods ,one crank with 4 balance weights in air at 1000 to 5000 rpm .
when something rotates so fast it creats eddies inside the crank case and . the centre of the eddy is the centre of low pressure . so all the oil which is returning back to sump and which is tossed all over again and again in the sump suspends in crank case air is dumped on the crank shaft. then crank shaft throws it away by hitting it hard!again and again . it costs power too .
the piston ring seal is maintained majorly due to pressure difference between the piston top and crank case.
lower the pressure in the crank case, l more the pressure difference -more better the seal -lesser the crank case blow by better the work done on the piston crown.
if we make an arrangement to suck the air off from the crank case<negative pressure> it will assist better ring seal+marginally better fuel<due to lesser parasitic losses> efficiency+much better oil life<less contamination due to lesser blow by> lesser air to move around WITHIN the engine ..lets say 6 litres at .85bar absolute instead of 6 lit air at 1.025 absolute .
so lesser mass to create trouble !

Last edited by TURBOSAM : 19th September 2007 at 10:01.
TURBOSAM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2007, 10:10   #70 (permalink)
BHPian
 
gemithomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Trivandrum
Posts: 939
Default

i get 10km/l in city if i put 30psi and 8.5-9km/l if i put 28 psi. but the ride is like heaven and (slightly towards) earth!!!
__________________
"Our world is in its current state because of the choices WE made ...or failed to make"
gemithomas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2007, 09:04   #71 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: pune
Posts: 245
Default hi!

the tyre manufacturers recomand the max tyre pressure WITH MAX PAY LOAD when cold .
they know that its going to increase when hot , so considering all the logical possibilities, the max pressure is quated with a lot of factor of safety in reserve.
and u generally never load the car to the max allowed load on tyres .
in short ,its safe too,and its not crossing the mfg.s limits too.
tyre pressure should be checket only when cold.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vivekiny2k View Post
I have observed a difference of upto 4 psi in my car in cold and running pressures.

if I put 1-2 psi less than max, in running it will be more than the max allowed. Are you sure you want to advise others of exceeding manufacturers limit on tyres?

you are talking about an extreme which i have never tried, and I personally suggest you to refrain from testing such measures for a gain in mileage. I won't want to see my tires deformed to such an extent. i would rather have bigger tires to reduce rolling resistance.

safety first bro! any mileage gain is not worth bursting tires on highway.

in spite of all that, I would be interested to see where did you see this data, since you have quoted hard numbers.
TURBOSAM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2007, 09:06   #72 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: pune
Posts: 245
Default yes!

there is always a pay off ,and you have to accept it,or forget it !
Quote:
Originally Posted by gemithomas View Post
i get 10km/l in city if i put 30psi and 8.5-9km/l if i put 28 psi. but the ride is like heaven and (slightly towards) earth!!!
TURBOSAM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2007, 15:13   #73 (permalink)
BHPian
 
mahadev_kc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bengaluru
Posts: 216
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricky_63 View Post
@ TURBOSAM..

It has been a pleasure to read your posts, as they come from an "unassuming" & knowledgeable person (as is evident from all the above posts) - rather than from those of us who think "they are the most knowledgeable" or from those whose each sentence is full of spite & sarcasm.

Cheers
Completely with everything you wrote here.

WOW.. Kudos to TURBOSAM.

After reading through a lot of comments in team-bhp, I'm eagerly waiting to switch to automobile field from electronics field.. Damn interesting is automobile field...
__________________
Cheers,
Gudda
------
Some drive cars, I drive the Palio
FIAT Palio 1.6 Sports | APR-2006 | 24000 Kms
mahadev_kc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2007, 09:02   #74 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: pune
Posts: 245
Default most welcome!!!

yes!
we need people who are in this line by passion...
then its getting paid for your dream jobs.
you are most welcome .

Quote:
Originally Posted by mahadev_kc View Post
Completely with everything you wrote here.

WOW.. Kudos to TURBOSAM.

After reading through a lot of comments in team-bhp, I'm eagerly waiting to switch to automobile field from electronics field.. Damn interesting is automobile field...
TURBOSAM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2007, 09:29   #75 (permalink)
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: pune
Posts: 245
Default about synthetic oils!

using syn oil has its own benifits.
if we use 0 w 40 or 5 w 50 oil , then the windage losses, pumping losses will get reduced substentially.
0 w 40 is still the horsepower/mileage king..
as parasitic losses are minimum .
BUT 0 w 40 oil evaporates fast due to large number of light fractions present in it. u can ecpect from 500 ml to 4 lit of loss in 15000 kms depending upon the application and engine.
i have exp 250 ml loss in 15000 kms in gtx.
(shell syn lost sunstentially only 1675 ml left out of 3800 ml added in my friends palio gtx within 15000 kms- and there is no oil leakage and no oil somsumption problem to his car. now he has fiat oil and only 28 grams is less in 7000 kms)

more the oil evaporates , more it settles on the valves, combustion chambers, intake manifolds,throttle bodies, temperature and pressure sensors, planum chambers,etc..
using 5 w 50 reduces this problem majorly .
if u get mobil -1 -15 w 50 and use it then its the best ol u can use in the car but it wont give you the milage advantage .
so u can steele down to 5 w 50 with minimum worries!
and u may expect @ 5 to 15 % fuel saving with this oil. if u have trips less than 10 kms and your engine doesnot get up to the oprating conditions(oil is thicker when cold - so 15 w oil or 20 w oil will be much thicker than 5 w oil . so with 5 w oil lesser efforts to pick up, pump, circulate the oil.) then u will benifit @ 15%in pertol cars.
on freeways with long distence trips the benifits will deminish and come close to 5 %

Last edited by TURBOSAM : 24th September 2007 at 09:34.
TURBOSAM is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to achieve Max FE in an Opel Corsa? raj_7703 Technical Stuff 12 2nd November 2008 21:33
4 kmpl palio 1.6???? HELP!!! sajeeth Technical Stuff 66 6th October 2008 21:11
Autocar India & Ford Fiesta achieve 33 kpl? windsurfer The Indian Car Scene!! 52 2nd April 2008 05:35
F.E. =150 Kmpl !! DCEite Shifting gears 12 30th March 2008 15:53
Is Swift Mileage 8-9 kmpl ?? shobhit15 The Indian Car Scene!! 60 6th April 2007 19:00


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 10:27.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Team-BHP.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488