| || ||Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|12th June 2010, 10:26||#76|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Some Points about PD tech.
1. Better emissions (Even at low idle). Uses a part called STC for better emissions at low idle.
2. PD Tech is basically used for heavy diesel engines. Cummins is using this Tech in INDIA for its K & V series Engines.
3. Advantage for this Tech is basically Excellent torque & better emmisions.
4. Disadvantage :- Basically a mechanical process. Not too much of electronics involved.
|13th June 2010, 16:50||#77|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Thanked: 1,415 Times
I am not a tech wizard and do not much know the technological advantages of one over the other but I know this, newer is not always better. Manufacturers often push something down our throats saying "it is latest" which actually means " hey dumbos, this is cheaper and easier for us to manufacture." And we buy their stories hook, line and sinker. Why am I saying this? Because there is an Octavia TDi one of my relatives has. It's not CRDi and heck it's not even PD, but who cares. It's an '03 model car and is nearing 4 lakhs. Still runs like new and flies on higways. Try pushing a PD or CRDi to 4 lakh Kms. They shine for 1st 1 lakh Kms and thereafter start disintegrating. So much for technological advances. I think these are primarily use and throw engines.
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Nano Diesel with CRDI technology coming? EDIT: Plans scrapped for now||bullock-Car||The Indian Car Scene||469||24th November 2015 18:38|
|Migrating from Petrol to Diesel CRDI cars:How to drive better ?||GSMINC||The Indian Car Scene||33||16th December 2011 19:17|
|Types of Diesel Technology||Mohnish||Technical Stuff||21||1st February 2009 10:53|
|is k&n replacement better or a cold intake better?||redsfx||Modifications & Accessories||1||31st May 2007 16:58|
|Better roads.. better late (than never)||Laxminarayan||Street Experiences||1||12th April 2006 03:14|