| || ||Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|30th April 2007, 09:27||#1|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Thanked: 89,445 Times
Tested and RIPPED : Chevrolet Spark 1.0 LS
Before we begin, I must add that I haven’t driven a small car in ages. So maybe I wasn’t the best choice to test-drive the Spark.
In the sea of myriad entry to mid-level hatchbacks, what really is the differentiator today? Each one is reliable, fuel-efficient, has peppy performance in the city, offers an average but acceptable level of ride and handling, can seat 4 people in “cozy close” comfort and come with near identical equipment levels. The key differentiators will be:
2. Quality of after-sales service.
3. Diesel engine option.
The Spark surely makes a statement with its cute chubby looks, which are only enhanced by the snazzy colours GMI is offering it in (several shades of bright metallics including greens, reds and some kind of yellow). The profile is identical Matiz, but the mild facelift ensures that it doesn’t look outdated today. The light treatment (front and back) is pretty good and gives it a certain level of uniqueness. On the inside, it’s a bore! The center-mounted instrument panel and the 3:45 stalk steering wheel are the only saving grace, with everything else reflecting a lackluster design in an even more lackluster shade of grey. Space is seriously at a premium (again, I haven’t sat in a Santro or Wagon R in a long time), but the car was at best a 4 seater. The front seats offer decent support; however the rear seat is slab sided, thin, very bench like and is not a comfortable place to be. With 4 in the car, it did feel pretty cramped.
I tested the mid-equipped version (air-con + power steering only) which presumably will be the most popular. Out on the open road, the engine made the Spark surprisingly peppy with 4 on board. It was fun to put through its paces and redline in each gear (btw no rpm gauge on any version). Coarseness does set in as you climb up the revs, and it was nowhere as smooth as say…the old Zen. The low end was above-average but the short gearing offers good urban drivability. The gearshift wasn’t slick and had a mushy feeling to it, but it was good in feel and offers precise-slotting.
On the handling front, there was hardly any body roll and the Spark felt very go-kartish to push around. On the limit, it does understeer but in a very predictable fashion. The steering is direct and even with only 60 odd bhp, made for an interesting drive. Of special mention are the excellent brakes; we had a situation where we slammed on the brakes at 80 kph and the car decelerated in a steady straight line with no tyres locking. The ride quality was above average but slight stiff at lower speeds. Road undulations could clearly be felt at low to mid speed ranges. However, as the speedo climbs up the ride gets better.
Overall a Spark offers a decent package as a product. BUTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT I feel that General Motors has gone a little over-board with the pricing. Here are the Mumbai on-road prices for individual registration:
1.0 E : 366,926 (no air-con)
1.0 : 393,384 (air-con only)
1.0 LS : 425213 (air-con + power steering)
1.0 LT : 460059 (above + front power windows and some frills)
1.0 LT OP : 500925 (Fully loaded).
As you can see, the 1.0 mid-equipped version is at 4.25 lacs!! And with no front power-windows but everything else (and more), the Swift retails for 4.6 lacs on the road. What would anyone really opt for? That 35,000 more gets you a whole lot more car (power, resale, space etc.). Heck, this makes the over-priced Aveo (4.70 on road) suddenly look like a value price.
|30th April 2007, 09:37||#3|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Thanked: 19,385 Times
GM has totally messed up the pricing on this car. in comparison the Zen Estilo, WagonR and santro are much more cheaper.
In bangalore the prices are as it is on the higher side. If you see the prices of these cars,
Zen Estilo LXi - 4.02L onroad (AC, PS, front power windows)
WagonR LXi - 4.08L onorad (AC, PS)
Santro XL - 3.96L onroad (AC, PS, front power windows and discounts)
So going by this the Spark LS model will be 4.4-4.6L which is more than the top end VXi of both the maruti's and the top end XO of the Santro.
And how will they justify the price to the general public who's first question will be why is it more expensive when engine is only 1.0L.
|30th April 2007, 09:41||#4|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Thanked: 117 Times
Nice review GTO
Agree on the pricing bit. GM needs to study the market in a more detailed manner before pricing their product.
They tend to overprice the car and then slash down on the price with heavy discounts, by then it is too late
When they go headon with Maruthi, they got to be conscious of their pricing...cos thats where Maruthi..beats competition
|30th April 2007, 09:42||#5|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Thanked: 173 Times
even I have seen people zipping past on the mathura road here in the test drive Spark, but the pricing, is more on the premium side of the segment.
Which again raises the question, is GM gonna go the same way with spark as Daewoo went with erstwhile Matiz, i.e price cuts & discounts due to competetion in the long run.?
|30th April 2007, 10:29||#8|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Thanked: 89,445 Times
I have a feeling GM is deliberately trying to cash in as they are restricted to only 2000 Sparks per month, until their new plant is up and running.
On another note, the General has slowly yet steadily expanded their range! I realised this when I walked into National Garage - a GM showroom which barely had any models to display previously - was filled with models yesterday. The Spark, Aveo, UV-A, Tavera, Optra and the SR-V.
|30th April 2007, 10:58||#9|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Thanked: 180 Times
Woah! I did not expect the Spark to cost so high onroad! Oh well, It is the Indica Turbo for me then!!!!!
Thanks for the first Spark TD on TBHP.
Last edited by DriverR : 30th April 2007 at 11:00. Reason: Additions
|30th April 2007, 11:09||#10|
Senior - BHPian
Join Date: Aug 2006
Thanked: 2 Times
Fantastic review again,its really a pleasure going through these.
Regarding the pricing had raised the issue in another thread,that GM certainly has messed around with the pricing and that the U-va base model is priced very close to the higher variants of the spark.Makes more sense to go for the U-va instead.
Last edited by rahul_intlad : 30th April 2007 at 11:13.
|30th April 2007, 11:14||#11|
Senior - BHPian
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ahmedabad - Tor
Thanked: 118 Times
there is quite some misconception here. Though the engine is just 1.0 litre, there's lots of innovations involved to make the car easy to drive.
Also, how come its wrong for GM to price a new car at a premium, while its ok if Maruti does it? There is no way swift vdi is worth the price at the moment. And zen wagonR top model is prices similar to base Swift. Matiz has always been seen as a good car in India( except the lack of power with a/c on, which again was due to the a/c being too powerful.)
The central dash is certainly a put off but the car is certainly a better buy than the zen if abs and airbags will be offered as an option.
And I think Gm is also giving a 3 year warranty which others give at an extra price. Plus Gm service is constantly improving.
Last edited by devarshi84 : 30th April 2007 at 11:15.
|30th April 2007, 11:22||#12|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Thanked: 9,025 Times
i m surprised to read a small car review by GTO.i think GM needs to rethink the pricing which is on higher side and wont benefit spark sales as chevrolet brand is even closely popular as Hyundai or Maruti in this segment.
|30th April 2007, 16:31||#14|
Senior - BHPian
Join Date: Oct 2005
Thanked: 154 Times
Zen Estilo, WagonR, Santro, Palio, Indica and due to their absurd pricing it has gone into the Swift, Getz, U-VA segment also.
How do you expect the car to suceed if the overall impression is that of over pricing & poor VFM? Secondly, apart from Novelty & Looks I don't really see a USP for the Spark. GM is already hyping that the car will give 27kmpl but we all know how true that is going to be.
A friend just TD'ed one today & came away unimpressed by the back seat space (cramped & only for 2 people according to him) and also another customer there told him that with discount he can get the Santro top model for around 3.80L. So he's now much more interested in the Santro over the Spark.
|30th April 2007, 16:57||#15|
Senior - BHPian
Join Date: Sep 2005
Thanked: 257 Times
What I cannot fathom is why manufacturers who have been around for a while in this market are failing miserably when it comes to pricing.
First the Logan, now the Spark, what next? Everyone is hoping like hell I guess that Maruti don't screw up on the SX4 pricing!
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Tested & Ripped:Ford Fiesta 1.6S Duratec...surely FIDA!!!(with alot of detailed pics)||katalysm76||Test-Drives & Initial Ownership Reports||56||20th October 2009 23:09|
|Tested and Ripped: Hyundai i10 Kappa||DCEite||Test-Drives & Initial Ownership Reports||176||11th October 2009 22:02|
|Tested & Ripped : 2008 Honda Accord||vcash||Test-Drives & Initial Ownership Reports||67||29th December 2008 10:04|
|Tested and RIPPED : BMW 320d!||GTO||Test-Drives & Initial Ownership Reports||60||23rd May 2008 09:56|
|Twin Tested & Ripped: New Honda CRV AT v/s New Suzuki Grand Vitara MT||Dippy||Test-Drives & Initial Ownership Reports||23||29th July 2007 00:19|