Go Back   Team-BHP > Indian Cars > Team-BHP Reviews > Test-Drives & Initial Ownership Reports

Test-Drives & Initial Ownership Reports First hand enthusiast reviews of test-driving and owning (initial stages) an Indian car


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 23rd October 2009, 12:32   #31 (permalink)
BHPian
 
sathee46's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Chennai
Posts: 306
Default

Congrats buddy, That is awesome. Black is one of my favourites after Aquaris. Your inspiration is even better
__________________
Fiesta 1.6S | Harman/Kardon - CA470 - CA1500M | Infinity Kappa - 680.9cs - 693.9i | IDQ 12 V2 D4 | JVC AVX800
sathee46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd October 2009, 20:30   #32 (permalink)
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 4
Default

[FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]Great buy. Congratulations.[/SIZE][/FONT]
__________________
Fiesta 1.6S | Karizma | RD 350
DipantS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th October 2009, 02:18   #33 (permalink)
ABZ
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pune
Posts: 38
Default

Mods - Request your help in editing the title of this thread to also say "Pics Added".

Fiesta owners - I need your suggestions for deciding on the sun film for front, sides and back of this Black 1.6S. I've gone through a lot of posts on T-BHP and think that Lumar / 3M should be the ones to consider as V-Kool and Huperoptik might be more expensive.

My requirements (in order of priority)
1. RTO approved.
2. Heat Resisting capacity.
3. Cost (Range: up to 10K)
4. Help reduce glare from oncoming traffic.
5. Help enhance the look of the car.
6. Warranty Period.

Please reply with the sunfilms you think would suit my requirements.
ABZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th October 2009, 21:34   #34 (permalink)
BHPian
 
kumar7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pune
Posts: 248
Default

If you looking for metallic finish then its available in 3M (RE 35) & its not dark film but cuts the heat and you don't feel too dark (Specially rear glass) when you sit inside the car.

I didn't applied film on front windshield but I researched and found 3M CR70 is good.

This combination should come around Rs 9000/- to Rs 9500/-

3M office is at KP, 4th lane so you can get it done directly from company else approach any dealer and tell them to send people at home. 3M people do job with perfection and they are trained accordingly.

If you want to go for darker films then go for Lumar.
__________________
Cheers

Josh Machine 1.4 ZXi TDCI - Sept 2009
Maruti 45000 KM [Sold]
Hero Honda [Sold]

Last edited by kumar7 : 29th October 2009 at 21:35.
kumar7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th October 2009, 21:58   #35 (permalink)
BHPian
 
anachronix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Madras
Posts: 878
Default

How did I miss this thread!? Congratulations ABZ.

Black does look awesome in the 1.6S.
__________________
Interviewer: The helmet has a special meaning for many drivers! How important is it to you?

Kimi: It protects my head.
anachronix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th October 2009, 01:19   #36 (permalink)
ABZ
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pune
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kumar7 View Post
If you looking for metallic finish then its available in 3M (RE 35) & its not dark film but cuts the heat and you don't feel too dark (Specially rear glass) when you sit inside the car.

I didn't applied film on front windshield but I researched and found 3M CR70 is good.

This combination should come around Rs 9000/- to Rs 9500/-

3M office is at KP, 4th lane so you can get it done directly from company else approach any dealer and tell them to send people at home. 3M people do job with perfection and they are trained accordingly.

If you want to go for darker films then go for Lumar.
Thanks buddy!

Does the 35 in RE35 mean it provides 35% visibility? I thought for being RTO approved, the minimum visibility required is 50%.

I stay quite close to KP; shall check out Lane 4 this weekend itself.
ABZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th October 2009, 01:40   #37 (permalink)
BHPian
 
kumar7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pune
Posts: 248
Default

When I approached accessories shop they said its RTO approved! I think its should be because its not at all dark and you can easily locate people sitting inside the car provided you looking from close because at certain angle it shines as it has metallic touch.

Below are details from 3M site -

E 35
Total Solar Energy Rejected: 56% Visible Light Transmission: 37% UV reduction: 99%
RE 50
Total Solar Energy Rejected: 43% Visible Light Transmission: 51% UV reduction: 99%
RE 70
Total Solar Energy Rejected: 34% Visible Light Transmission: 70% UV reduction: 98%

My suggestion will be first go for side glasses and once you comfortable with it then go for front windshield. The reason behind is that when you will put the sun film on front it will have reflection(sometimes) so its better go step by step.
__________________
Cheers

Josh Machine 1.4 ZXi TDCI - Sept 2009
Maruti 45000 KM [Sold]
Hero Honda [Sold]

Last edited by kumar7 : 30th October 2009 at 01:42.
kumar7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th October 2009, 12:26   #38 (permalink)
ABZ
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pune
Posts: 38
Default

@ kumar7 - I did go through your thread with the pics of the sunfilms. They look pretty good but am still worried that the RE 35 may not be RTO approved. Always thought that the visibility rating (in this case, 37%) needs to be 50% for sides and back and 70% for the front.

Am I missing something here?
ABZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th October 2009, 12:32   #39 (permalink)
BHPian
 
nairrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Payyannur-Kannur district
Posts: 639
Default

I dont think RTO/Police going to check each and every car to see what is the film
visibility percentage?
The cop need to see you from outside, thats all they require.
Incase they are not able to see the driver or passengers inside the car, then they can claim /trouble you that the film which fixed in the door glasses are not visible/not approved by RTO ?
Thanks
nairrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th October 2009, 15:59   #40 (permalink)
ABZ
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pune
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nairrk View Post
I dont think RTO/Police going to check each and every car to see what is the film
visibility percentage?
The cop need to see you from outside, thats all they require.
Incase they are not able to see the driver or passengers inside the car, then they can claim /trouble you that the film which fixed in the door glasses are not visible/not approved by RTO ?
Thanks
Are you saying that the RE 35 is not RTO approved but I need not be worried since as kumar7 said this film is on the 'lighter' side?

Then again, with a metallic finish, isn't the cop most likely to see himself instead of me?
ABZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th October 2009, 16:40   #41 (permalink)
BHPian
 
nairrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Payyannur-Kannur district
Posts: 639
Default

Sorry, I am not telling the RE 35 is not RTO approved.The shop guy will definitely explain you what all grades are RTO approved.If you are still worried about metallic finish, then opt for non-metallic films?
nairrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th October 2009, 18:03   #42 (permalink)
ABZ
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pune
Posts: 38
Default

@nairrk - The issue is not metallic/non-metallic. It's just that I have heard of stories where cops have removed sunfilms then-and-there since it was not as per RTO norms.

I'll anyways be checking with the dealer but dealers tend to say things to sell their stuff that may not necessarily be true.

So, am just trying to ascertain facts from knowledgeable folks like you.
ABZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th October 2009, 19:02   #43 (permalink)
BHPian
 
yogi1771's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: mumbai
Posts: 549
Default

Films with minimum 50% light transmission are RTO approved I think.
yogi1771 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th October 2009, 21:11   #44 (permalink)
BHPian
 
kumar7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pune
Posts: 248
Default

ABZ@ As per dealer they only keep RTO approved films on display even though they have non- RTO approved films but they kept small sample of it and they kept that in drawers. So if you go for specific series then usually dealers don't recommend anything because they understand that you did research and thats why you asking for that particular series.

I was looking for partially mirror type film but then dealer said its not RTO approved so he recommended me to go for RE 35. Please bare in mind that its not darker so it may happen that you will find Lumar (with 50% visibility) look darker in comparison with it!

You have decided 2 brands - Llumar & 3M (Both are good brands)
You looking for darker or lighter shades ? - As per dealer 3M RTO approved films are not in dark colors.
Metallic/Non-metallic? - Metallic available only in 3M (as per dealer)
Warranty - 3M comes with 3 year warranty. Am not sure about Llumar (they may have same)
Most important - Price factor ? Llumar is comparatively costlier by 1 - 1.5K

Its different issue which ever film you go for but I don't think cops will force you to remove film on the spot because its not easier to remove as you need sharp blades. Cops are busy in collections so don't worry!
__________________
Cheers

Josh Machine 1.4 ZXi TDCI - Sept 2009
Maruti 45000 KM [Sold]
Hero Honda [Sold]

Last edited by kumar7 : 30th October 2009 at 21:12.
kumar7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th October 2009, 21:23   #45 (permalink)
ABZ
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pune
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kumar7 View Post
ABZ@ As per dealer they only keep RTO approved films on display even though they have non- RTO approved films but they kept small sample of it and they kept that in drawers.
================
Cops are busy in collections so don't worry!
Thanks kumar7. To answer some of your questions.

Brand: 3M / Llumar
Shade: I think darker would look better given the color of the car - Black.
Metallic/Non-metallic: Assuming that the metallic mean a more mirror-like effect?
Warranty: Anything around 3 years should be fine.
Price: 10K (max)
ABZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My new black Ford Fiesta nairrk Test-Drives & Initial Ownership Reports 160 21st November 2009 12:25
Go Fida ... My new Ford Fiesta 1.6S ..Aquarius Blue nityanand.s.s Test-Drives & Initial Ownership Reports 63 30th October 2009 11:22
Tested & Ripped:Ford Fiesta 1.6S Duratec...surely FIDA!!!(with alot of detailed pics) katalysm76 Test-Drives & Initial Ownership Reports 56 21st October 2009 00:09
go figga out the go fida! 1.6 new ford fiesta sxi bIte tHe bulLet Test-Drives & Initial Ownership Reports 29 26th October 2008 19:45
Ford launches limited version Fiesta (1.6 fida edition) diwa The Indian Car Scene 19 7th January 2008 16:42


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 03:42.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Team-BHP.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607