Team-BHP > 4x4 & Off-Roading > 4x4 Technical


Reply
  Search this Thread
9,911 views
Old 26th November 2008, 15:20   #1
BHPian
 
inder_s1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 238
Thanked: 38 Times
GV vs Pajero <features/offroading capability>

Hi All,

Seen lots of comparisions on this forums.

Car vs Car, bike vs bike, Jeep vs Jeep

We have T-BHPians with Pajero's and GV's. Has anyone compared the two in terms of off-roading capability along with other features??

Just curious
inder_s1 is offline  
Old 26th November 2008, 15:23   #2
Distinguished - BHPian
 
sudev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Gurgaon
Posts: 3,838
Thanked: 3,179 Times

Prices do not match
Engines do not match
Fuels do not match
Type of chasis does not match
Performance do not match (As Samurai put it)
.....
.....

Then why?

Just curious.

Last edited by sudev : 26th November 2008 at 15:29.
sudev is offline  
Old 26th November 2008, 15:24   #3
Team-BHP Support
 
Samurai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bangalore/Udupi
Posts: 25,813
Thanked: 45,434 Times

That is one contest Pajero will win handsomely. GV is not even in the same league as Pajero.
Samurai is offline  
Old 26th November 2008, 15:50   #4
BHPian
 
Torque-ative's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 500
Thanked: 89 Times

The Vitara with the shorter wheel base and shorter overhangs is quite the mountain goat. I will not write it off all together !

On 22nd Nov OTR,..I saw the limitations of the Pajero (the current Indian version). With the LWB and lengthly overhangs it was at as much a disadvatage as the TLC Prado was.

What a revelation it is to actually have seen those jeeps in action. Gives new & "REAL" meaning to "make your own road". As one jeeper did with Wife and 8year~ old daughter on broad,...just took the leap of faith down a steep ravine in the Jeep fondly called 8181 !!!!
Torque-ative is offline  
Old 26th November 2008, 16:11   #5
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Tejas@perioimpl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bombay
Posts: 4,423
Thanked: 9,581 Times

i had seen a program on cnbc a year ago where they had compared the off-roading abilities of pajero, endeavor, the old vitara and the forester.

Endeavor lost badly.
Forester would have won due to best handling and control but for ground clearance.
There was a tie between the pajero and vitara.

Pajero was finally given winner only because of higher ground clearance.
Tejas@perioimpl is offline  
Old 26th November 2008, 16:36   #6
Senior - BHPian
 
iceman91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: melbourne/banga
Posts: 1,961
Thanked: 34 Times

A friend and me had done this excercise for the endeavour and the Pajero.
The endeavour 3.0 not the earlier model.
The endeavour won!!
He bought it too .
He owned a pajero earlier and was amazed to see the performance of the ford.
The only downside is the overhang of the endeavour.
iceman91 is offline  
Old 26th November 2008, 18:35   #7
GTO
Team-BHP Support
 
GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bombay
Posts: 70,483
Thanked: 300,252 Times

Quote:
A friend and me had done this excercise for the endeavour and the Pajero.
The endeavour 3.0 not the earlier model.
The endeavour won!!
Purely driver dependant. The Pajero will beat the Endy hands down in any terrain.
GTO is offline  
Old 26th November 2008, 18:42   #8
BHPian
 
aamir567's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Rawalpindi
Posts: 701
Thanked: 526 Times

No comparison between these two machines
aamir567 is offline  
Old 26th November 2008, 22:38   #9
Senior - BHPian
 
Mpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 10,409
Thanked: 1,729 Times

Frankly I think it will be a close contest
Quote:
Originally Posted by sudev View Post
Prices do not match
Engines do not match
Fuels do not match
Type of chasis does not match
Performance do not match (As Samurai put it)
Then why?
For someone looking for a midsize SUV with good off road capability in the 15-20lakh bracket, regardless of engine, fuel, chassis.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aamir567 View Post
No comparison between these two machines
Meaning? which one is better?
Mpower is offline  
Old 26th November 2008, 23:05   #10
Senior - BHPian
 
aaggoswami's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vadodara
Posts: 4,982
Thanked: 2,930 Times

Pajero is a bigger machine and is better as far as on road behavior is considered. And Offroad also Pajero ( earlier generation ) is better.

But if consider both the vehicles in their present era, both of them are equal with respective negative and positive points. Pajero has advantage of a diesel motor where as the J20 from Suzuki is not a perfect motor for off road driving.

But they are equal in my mind. The GV has capable underpinnings.

O.T. but if you really want to compare off roaders, then its better if we bring in Jimmy ( Gypsy and present generation sold in Europe ) as it is light weight and will have advantage.
Also bring in Lada Niva.
aaggoswami is offline  
Old 27th November 2008, 00:31   #11
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pune
Posts: 3,054
Thanked: 3,309 Times

Well...
pricing in India is nothing to go buy.
And Mitsubishi/HM cartel sucks way too much.

IMHO, there is absolutely no harm in comparing the two.

In my native place (in the Ratnagiri district in Konkan), both GV and Pajero will be equally useless.
anandpadhye is offline  
Old 27th November 2008, 00:55   #12
BHPian
 
CaliforniaKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: IND + DXB
Posts: 980
Thanked: 141 Times

I guess if you compare the 3.2 version of the GV to the 3.8 Petrol pajero, we might end up with some new conclusions.But definitely not with the 2.0 GV.
CaliforniaKnight is online now  
Old 27th November 2008, 02:36   #13
Senior - BHPian
 
iceman91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: melbourne/banga
Posts: 1,961
Thanked: 34 Times

Rush.. Agree to an extent but i personaly have taken terrains with ease wher the mitsubishi struggled. Also the pajero has after sales issues and the engine is a 94 model. I am talkin the whole deal here not just otr capabilities
iceman91 is offline  
Old 27th November 2008, 09:45   #14
BHPian
 
GoSlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Noida
Posts: 507
Thanked: 78 Times

This is what Torquative meant "With the LWB and lengthly overhangs it was at as much a disadvatage as the TLC Prado was"... Pajero in OTR

But dont discount he beast by this pic. It went through most other obstacles though the driver was not as adventourous as Torquative and his friend Arjun in their Toyota Landcruiser Prado.
Attached Thumbnails
GV vs Pajero <features/offroading capability>-dsc_0315.jpg  

GV vs Pajero <features/offroading capability>-dsc_0316.jpg  

GV vs Pajero <features/offroading capability>-dsc_0311.jpg  

GoSlow is offline  
Old 27th November 2008, 11:08   #15
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 4,008
Thanked: 4,189 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tejas@perioimpl View Post
i had seen a program on cnbc a year ago where they had compared the off-roading abilities of pajero, endeavor, the old vitara and the forester.

Forester would have won due to best handling and control but for ground clearance.
Forester's lower ground clearance is more of a perception. With self leveling suspension (which means it doesnt come down further with load), in reality it will equal the GC of GV in my opinion. But yes the overhangs could pose problem.
Guna is online now  
Reply

Most Viewed
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks