Quote:
Originally Posted by vinod_nookala DKG-You had B275 engine on your jeep earlier to petrol with 4.27 diff ratio and now you have silky smooth hurricane petrol with 5.38 ratio. Even though you had a higher diff ratio which engine had better engine braking? |
Very interesting discussion. Just read through it from start. Here's what I can say in the hope it answers questions from both sides
a. The very term engine braking refers to use of vacuum within an engine to retard.
On that score we have to concede to Sankar who so patiently has been harping this accurate techical fact all along.
As Sankar has repeatedly said by virtue of the design of a petrol engine and its intake system where there is the double effect of a venturi and a closed throttle valve creating an engine vacuum inherently yes a petrol engine enjoys engine braking naturally when you lift off the throttle.
b. All drivetrains experience some frictional lossses. However these frictional losses are not of much consequence to induce engine braking
c. The compression ratio, flyhweel weight, gearbox ratios and final drive ration all affect the overall retardation of a vehicle during deceleration. This is not and should not be confused with the term engine braking
Engine braking purely refers to retardation on account of vacuum. So techically and in actuality a petrol engined vehicle will have superior engine braking.
A lot of guys are engaging in this lively discussion based on their personal driving experiences and their actual experiences are contrary to what has been stated by Sankar correctly. Their experience in my understanding is referring to retardation on account of other factors other than engine braking.
So while we must concede the discussion to Sankar on grounds that technically when we are talking about engine braking its referring to primary use of vacuum there are other elements which aid retardation.
In most diesels the intake of air is not controlled by a throttle valve. The power strokes are controlled more by the quantum of fuel injected into the combustion chamber.Now on idle a typical diesel engine will not have any vacuum. Only lesser fuel injected.
So diesel engines do not "engine brake" (considering the term refers to use of vacuum to retard)
Having said this lets discuss real life experiences.
1.Compare a low compression engine to a high compression engine. Its obvious you need more power to put a high compression engine through its compression stroke.
So on account of compression the engine provides greater resistance which can retard a vehicle bring driven by wheels (downhill scenario)
So diesels have a natural resistance advantage to petrols here.
2. Heavier flywheel. This has a upside and a downside in terms of retardation. On a short downhill a heavier mass will have more inertial mass retarding the effect of wheels attempting to turn the engine. BUT this is shortlived. In no time does the flywheel gather energy as it rotates and this actually has the opposite effect and makes the engine keep revving.
Again Sankar rightly observed that a low mass flywheel will retard better over a longer downhill slope compared to a high mass flywheel. Advantage to petrols as they naturally don't require heavier flywheels
3. Gearing and final drives
As a layman speaking a smaller gear driving a larger gear will have torque multiplication when driving and torque reduction when driven. So its harder to turn a 5.38 axle based drivetrain with the wheels as compared to a 4.27 axle. ie More resistance encountered by wheels when attempting to reverse turn a 5.38
Same applies for gearbox rations. What multiplies torque when driving will work against the wheels when being driven
So a car retards more when driven by a lower ratio drivetrain.
So in summary guys, Sankar is right when it comes to the term engine braking. It refers ONLY to use of vacuum to retard a vehcle. Petrols inherently enjoy more manifold/cylinder vacuum while diesels enjoy none (most cases) and hence if the discussion is purely referring to the term engine braking a petrol always brakes better on account of engine braking.
But diesels have advantages on account of compression but not enough to surpass that of vacuum. Which is why diesel engines employ the aid of jake brakes or exhaust brakes to create vacuum within to retard a vehicle.
To answer your question Vinod if I am coming downhill from Ooty which do I think will retard more efficiently, my previous diesel config or the petrol. I think the petrol