Quote:
is it becasue of this reason (pls correct me, if i am wrong)
Since its a first order Xover (6 Db) it will still send in signals (at a reduced db) till its next octave. Example: If i use my Xover frequncy as 3 Khz, @ 6 db slope/ocatve, it will send frequncies till 6 Khz (however the loudness (db) of the signal reduces constantly till it reaches 6 Khz.
|
okay - im not going to get into the coils and caps part if it
but lets only talk about the crossover slope and how it works
say for simplicity's sake you have a midrange speaker which has a frequency response from 200hz to 8000hz this means that it can play from 200hz to 8000hz but at the absolute limits you cant really play it loud - so to reduce that you want to be one octave away from the limits so you decide to bandpass between 400hz and 4000hz - so the speaker will play in a linear manner from 400hz of 4000hz let us say for example again at 100db SPL
now once again lets concentrate the example to the upper low pass of the speaker at 4000hz - if you use a first order filter the frequencies above 4000hz will reduce by 6db when the curve reaches 8000hz ........ so while the speaker plays 400hz to 4000hz at 100db you will still be getting 8000hz playing but 6db lower ie at 94db
then if you used a second order filter the slope then becomes 12db/octave so while 400hz to 4000hz play at 100db you will have 8000hz playing at 88db - and if you used a third order filter this then makes the slope 18db/octave so that 8000hz will still be playing but at 82db and with a fourth order filter the slope is 24db/octave and hence that 8000hz will still be playing at around 76db
when that 4000hz plays at 100db and the 8000hz plays around 20db lower you dont hear it at all - so the higher slopes are generally considered better
but the story doesnt end there because changing the slope also changes the phase as well - and phase is not only just the difference between changing positive and negative - thats polarity - and swopping polarity only changes phase by 180 degrees - phase has more to do with the arrival times of the wave form to its destination ie your ear - its all about whether the wave is in a crest or trough and how high up the crest or how low down the trough and this is measured in degrees - so differing slopes will change the phase as well - so you cant just say im going to have one slope at 6db/octave or another at 12db/octave because you will still have the same identical frequencies coming from both the drivers because the tweeter plays that range at a rate thats reducing according to the slope and the midrange also plays the same frequency at a rate thats reducing according to the slope - have those at locations that have way differing pathlengths then those frequencies could land up at the destination ie your ear totally out of phase and cause cancellations of those particular frequencies that you wont be able to EQ out ie even if you raise that particular EQ band to become louder the null causes it to cancel even more and that frequency basically ceases to exist in your system
so designing crossovers is not as simple as just placing a set of caps and inductors in series with the speaker - you have to look at the complete picture and how well the speaker plays at its limits and at point distortion will set in and what slope actually works better with a particular driver - for example you could be using that same speaker we used as an example above and with a steeper slope ie at 24db/octave it might even be able handle playing up to 6000hz at that 100db but at a 6db/octave slope you might need to actually crossover at 3000hz
all of this is theory though - yet to be honest i would be far happier if you used second order filters for your crossover ie a 12db/octave crossover - which makes it a bit more complex but it does help a lot IMHO in preserving your speakers
this is why if you want a three way front stage plus sub (effectively a 4 way setup) its far better to be doing it off a proper processor which gives you the 4 way crossover and adjustable slopes as well as the T/A to compensate for the pathlength differences - i reckon a JBL MS8 or the audison bit one is ideal but since you already have the headunit performing most of those functions for you - you will have to compromise somewhere along the line
i understand that the speaker depth was also a problem and that the smaller driver is hence more effective but maybe you could also consider rebuilding that A-pillar and just buying that component set instead - it makes it easier in terms of the crossover because you do get a crossover designed for the particular parameters of those speakers but then again if i was faced with your predicament i would also want the CDM54 or CDM88 and a good tweeter (like the ones you said you were after) instead of the lower end component set
oh and one more small thing - it depends on the tweeter you get but for example the piccolo has an impedance of 6 ohms not the typical 4 ohms so you have to also take that into account for the capacitor you use (caps and inductors if you go to a higher order filter)
in order to know more about passive crossovers - dont relate it too much to digital signal processing - an excellent reference for crossover building is still "the loudspeaker design cookbook" by Vance Dickason and you can also google lots of webpages on speaker crossover design - those most of those will have tables that give you the circuit design and the different values of the caps and inductors required for each slope as well