@LNG, that would be like comparing pyjamas with trousers. Both cover the legs, but differ completely in usage, cost, and most importantly in the perception of associated quality.
- Sound in normal broadcast TV is low bandwidth in transmission itself. Video is the primary objective, audio serves only to complete the program. TV audio bandwidth is much less than that encoded in DVD programs, where the objective is a complete experience - video, audio that can support spatial resolution etc. TV audio components hence need to be just good enough to reproduce what is transmitted, and can be optimized for cost. DVD audio, as associated with home theater (not even CD-based home "hi-fi", though increasingly home theater is catching up), is correspondingly costlier
- ICE can only be compared with at worst home theater, or at best "hi-fi" where the need for quality is much, much higher. And high quality comes at a high cost in everything, right?
- With that logic, it is not advisable to use low-quality TV components for listening to in a car, even if they can be practically mounted. However, human mind works in different ways - if someone wants to do it, there is nothing to stop them! |