25th November 2007, 22:19
| #16 |
| Senior - BHPian Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: NYC/MAA
Posts: 1,430
Thanked: 603 Times
| |
|
| |
|
25th November 2007, 22:34
| #17 | |
| BHPian Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bombay
Posts: 484
Thanked: 27 Times
| Hmmmm Quote:
| |
|
|
|
25th November 2007, 23:10
| #18 |
| Senior - BHPian  | |
|
|
|
26th November 2007, 09:23
| #19 |
| Distinguished - BHPian   | |
|
|
26th November 2007, 11:32
| #20 | |
| Senior - BHPian Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: N.A
Posts: 7,046
Thanked: 2,751 Times
| Quote:
Parvath - this thing is bigger than Innovas or Taveras. We came across hordes of these Wingers during our trip to Sabarimala last week - it seems to have become a big hit with the pilgrims, or at least with the tour operators that the pilgrims use. I doubt if you can use it like an Innova or a Tavera. This is more in the Tempo Traveller market, without being as big as that vehicle. | |
|
|
|
26th November 2007, 11:42
| #21 | |
| Senior - BHPian | Quote:
So how much would be the luxury variant of the winger would cost? We are currently looking at the tavera with PS ans AC, which is comming to around 8lakhs OTR. Shall we consider the winger also. Remind you that the vehicle will be carrying 4 people - a driver, myself in the passenger seat in the front, my parents in the middle row. The front and middle row comfort should by high. Oh!, btw, I am 6'2'' tall and my dad is 5'10'' tall. Our main usage will be to go to farm-house(over 100km on highway) in the week-ends. Will be ferrying labour in the rear seats once in a month. Also will be carrying lots of fruits and few vegetables in the rear. Please comment. P.S. sorry for hijacking the thread. | |
|
|
|
9th December 2007, 10:25
| #22 |
| BHPian Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bombay
Posts: 484
Thanked: 27 Times
| I saw something queer in the PDF Brochure. The Turning Radius of the Luxury Edition is more than the Basic Version. How is that possible ? btw I saw a few Wingers on the move. The Vehicle is very strong and can carry many people.  |
|
|
|
9th December 2007, 10:49
| #23 | |
| Distinguished - BHPian | Quote:
The problem with using the Winger for cargo is limitation of space. The cargo will have to be limited to inside the body. And trust me, no matter how much care you take when you load and un-load stuff, the interiors are bound to get dirty. Some of these stains will not go. It will be a pain to maintain the interiors as clean as you want it to be. Or, a better option : De-couple your personal transport from the needs for your farm-house. Use your regular vehicles for your own transport. And get yourself a 207 DI, or a Bolero Pick-up, even if they are used. That will take care of all your cargo handling, and can also be used to ferry labourers. Get some foldable bench seats in the back, which the labourers can use to sit on, for that 2 hour ride. This option may look like you'll spend more and have an extra vehicle, but in the long run, it is your best bet. | |
|
|
|
9th December 2007, 10:57
| #24 | |
| Distinguished - BHPian | Quote:
Luxury version : 4920 mm overall length, 3200 mm WB. Turning radius: 6.40m Basic versions : 4520 mm overall length, 2800 mm WB. Turning radius: 5.65m This should explain the difference. | |
|
|
|
9th December 2007, 19:16
| #25 |
| Senior - BHPian  | alright now that there is so much of talk about winger, I shall substantiate what the author noticed, I see this everyday! pretty huge must say but just the same vanilla vehicle all over and over again.   |
|
|
|
9th December 2007, 21:41
| #26 | |
| BANNED Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Kochi
Posts: 2,522
Thanked: 752 Times
| Quote:
| |
|
|
| |
|
9th December 2007, 22:58
| #27 |
| Distinguished - BHPian | |
|
|
|
10th December 2007, 18:50
| #28 |
| Senior - BHPian  | |
|
|
|
16th December 2007, 13:40
| #29 |
| BHPian Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bombay
Posts: 484
Thanked: 27 Times
| Thanks Condor for explaining the difference in Turning Radius. It is like Normal S Class or Long Wheelbase Version.  |
|
|
 |
Most Viewed