Re: Tesla “may have shot itself in the foot” by trying to hyper-automate its factory Spread over an area of 5.3 million square feet, Tesla’s factory in Fremont, California, is the third largest factory in the world and it is one of the most automated manufacturing plants. Tesla is aiming to double the foot print to 10 million square feet in the coming years. Operating such a huge facility, with a product lineup of four cars and producing a couple of thousand cars per year is unwarranted. Ideally they should have started their operations in a rather moderate scale and should have scaled up, when the technology becomes mainstream and market demand grows up. Such large scale sophisticated levels of automation and the huge costs involved justifies the losses Tesla has made so far.
1) Existing levels of automation in manufacturing industries are semi-intelligent in nature, meaning they are capable enough to take control over repetitive and tedious tasks done by humans, but not capable of handling deviations or irregularities. Human intervention is required to handle these situations.
2) What happens when the intelligence of automation is increased so that there is less and less dependency on human beings ? The automation system should be robust enough to control the process, by taking continuous feed back from the results of the operations performed. Robotic systems are quite capable at it.
3) Automation is supposed to improve the productivity, quality and efficiency. Then, where do we have a problem with automation ? What is over automation or hyper automation ?
4) What I believe is that the Tesla's highly intelligent automation systems, like any other automation system are designed for performing under a set of operating conditions, which when done yields results, much superior to manually controlled systems.
5)But, when the boundary conditions are not met, when there is a deviation in the operating parameters, the system becomes incapable of handling it and it either stops or it continues to operate in a faulty manner.
6) As quoted in the article, Elon Musk himself has come to realize that there should be a balancing act between human and machine skills. What one lacks, the other should supplement. Quote:
Founder and CEO Elon Musk, for years one of strongest proponents of a future where there are no people in the production process and his factory looks like an alien spaceship, is now acknowledging that the optimal level of automation remains a complex balancing act of design, productivity, quality, and human and machine skills.
He recently blamed an overly automated production process as the reason for missing Tesla’s output targets. “Humans are underrated,” he tweeted. And Musk added to CBS, “We had this crazy, complex network of conveyor belts… and it was not working, so we got rid of that whole thing.”
|
7) It is not the hyper automation which is to be looked down upon, but the improper application of it, that is to be blamed. What say ?
Last edited by BLACKBLADE : 10th May 2018 at 12:32.
Reason: Typos Corrected
|