Team-BHP > Shifting gears > Et Cetera
Register New Topics New Posts Top Thanked Team-BHP FAQ


Reply
  Search this Thread
3,643,155 views
Old 20th October 2012, 22:44   #15031
Senior - BHPian
 
kpzen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Faridabad
Posts: 5,610
Thanked: 1,876 Times
Re: The Official non-auto Image thread

Tommy Bahama !!
The Official non-auto Image thread-20121018kps_4503-large.jpg
kpzen is offline  
Old 21st October 2012, 00:09   #15032
BHPian
 
Gandhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 958
Thanked: 206 Times
Re: The Official non-auto Image thread

Few clicks from drive to 17 mile drive and Big Sur.

The Official non-auto Image thread-2012101517milebigsur052.jpg

The Official non-auto Image thread-2012101517milebigsur058.jpg

The Official non-auto Image thread-2012101517milebigsur167.jpg
Gandhi is offline  
Old 21st October 2012, 14:38   #15033
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,112
Thanked: 403 Times
Re: The Official non-auto Image thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandhi View Post
Few clicks from drive to 17 mile drive and Big Sur.
Awesome pics! Bay area is the place to be if you love photography. Within 1000 miles, you have beaches, deserts, green forests, redwoods, Las Vegas(it has a category of its own ), snow capped mountains and what not. Enjoy!


My first attempt in Rose Macro. Comments and Suggestions welcome
(Please click on the image to view a clearer image.)
The Official non-auto Image thread-ds1_69092p3.jpg
Nikon D7000, Nikkor 18-105mm, Raynox DCR-250.
blue_pulsar is online now  
Old 21st October 2012, 15:31   #15034
BHPian
 
Torqueguru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 277
Thanked: 165 Times

@Samurai
I think fall should be ripe right now along the East coast. She's having a Fujifilm X10 around her neck. Keen observation and question Samurai!
Torqueguru is offline  
Old 23rd October 2012, 09:00   #15035
BHPian
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 38
Thanked: 12 Times
Re: The Official non-auto Image thread

Its off peak in Maine right now and I guess it must be peak at NJ/NY. A picture of the present situation.

The Official non-auto Image thread-fall_01.jpg
KameshR is offline  
Old 23rd October 2012, 10:52   #15036
BHPian
 
Torqueguru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 277
Thanked: 165 Times
Re: The Official non-auto Image thread

@Prajeesh
Super shot! Great lighting.
@Kamesh
wow! Beautiful light Kamesh!

Snoqualmie Fall, Washington.
The Official non-auto Image thread-8113381439_092a2e7a1f_b.jpg
Regards,
TG.

Last edited by Torqueguru : 23rd October 2012 at 10:53.
Torqueguru is offline  
Old 23rd October 2012, 17:20   #15037
Senior - BHPian
 
ajay_satpute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Pune
Posts: 1,955
Thanked: 1,704 Times
Re: The Official non-auto Image thread

Angry Birds Rio on a tablet at a restaurant.

The Official non-auto Image thread-dsc04946-copy.jpg
ajay_satpute is offline  
Old 26th October 2012, 01:14   #15038
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,286
Thanked: 1,011 Times
Re: EVIL Cameras

First pic in my life in which I was able to isolate my subject from the background.

Heres a crop of the same. No post processing done, it was shot in jpeg only. I have not yet started shooting RAW.

The Official non-auto Image thread-1.jpg

Camera settings: 50mm (Olympus 12-50 kit lens), 1/160, f6.3, ISO 200

Critique invited. I am pretty happy with myself though for this mini achievement
joslicx is offline  
Old 26th October 2012, 07:58   #15039
Team-BHP Support
 
Samurai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bangalore/Udupi
Posts: 25,828
Thanked: 45,532 Times
Re: The Official non-auto Image thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by blue_pulsar View Post
My first attempt in Rose Macro. Comments and Suggestions welcome
I feel the image is a bit soft, need more DOF. Composition is very good.

Quote:
Originally Posted by joslicx View Post
Critique invited. I am pretty happy with myself though for this mini achievement
Composition is missing. Feels like the image is bit OOF. When you shoot something with blurred background, the foreground subject should be sharp.
Samurai is offline  
Old 26th October 2012, 08:34   #15040
Senior - BHPian
 
vivekiny2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: cincinnati, jabalpur,chennai
Posts: 1,264
Thanked: 209 Times
Re: EVIL Cameras

Quote:
Originally Posted by joslicx View Post
First pic in my life in which I was able to isolate my subject from the background.

Heres a crop of the same. No post processing done, it was shot in jpeg only. I have not yet started shooting RAW.

Attachment 1005682

Camera settings: 50mm (Olympus 12-50 kit lens), 1/160, f6.3, ISO 200

Critique invited. I am pretty happy with myself though for this mini achievement
as far as I can see, it's backlit (light behind the subject). It can work wonders if you intentionally wanted it, else it's a disaster.

And as Samurai said, there has to be something of interest in focus.
vivekiny2k is offline  
Old 26th October 2012, 09:09   #15041
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,112
Thanked: 403 Times
Re: The Official non-auto Image thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samurai View Post
I feel the image is a bit soft, need more DOF. Composition is very good.
Thanks Samurai, for the comments. Please take one more look at this.
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8325/8...f9f55aee_h.jpg
This image is more sharper than the one uploaded here (It is the same image). The Raynox has an extremely shallow DOF. Getting used to it.
Also, learning how to pick up the right roses for future shots!

But yes, like you said, the edges of the petals should have been sharper, isn't it?
blue_pulsar is online now  
Old 26th October 2012, 09:39   #15042
Team-BHP Support
 
Samurai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bangalore/Udupi
Posts: 25,828
Thanked: 45,532 Times
Re: The Official non-auto Image thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by blue_pulsar View Post
But yes, like you said, the edges of the petals should have been sharper, isn't it?
Yes, but the new one is much better. I can see some sharper elements, but I see you are working with very shallow DOF.

When you work with very shallow DOF, you have to be very careful about what you want in focus. It depends on your composition skills. Some examples of shallow DOF from my collection: http://samurai.smugmug.com/Photograp...775210&k=zVCRe

Last edited by Samurai : 26th October 2012 at 09:49.
Samurai is offline  
Old 26th October 2012, 12:51   #15043
BHPian
 
gr8guzzler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Navi Mumbai
Posts: 653
Thanked: 87 Times
Re: The Official non-auto Image thread

Sunset captured from Airoli with Mulund skyline
Attached Thumbnails
The Official non-auto Image thread-1img_5901.jpg  

The Official non-auto Image thread-1img_5898.jpg  

gr8guzzler is offline  
Old 26th October 2012, 17:47   #15044
Senior - BHPian
 
jkdas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Thiruvananthapu
Posts: 9,687
Thanked: 1,492 Times
Re: The Official non-auto Image thread

Neighbor wanted me to take his dog's pix and hence.
Attached Thumbnails
The Official non-auto Image thread-r_dsc_1178.jpg  

jkdas is offline  
Old 26th October 2012, 19:15   #15045
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,286
Thanked: 1,011 Times
Re: EVIL Cameras

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samurai View Post
Composition is missing. Feels like the image is bit OOF. When you shoot something with blurred background, the foreground subject should be sharp.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vivekiny2k View Post
as far as I can see, it's backlit (light behind the subject). It can work wonders if you intentionally wanted it, else it's a disaster.

And as Samurai said, there has to be something of interest in focus.
Thanks for the points. I think I get what you guys are saying. Basically these are the problems:
1. focus issue. I guess there is a focus ring on the lens i need to play with?
2. There is no particular object of interest in the image. Actually the whole image was that of a Tulsi pot on the balcony's parapet. I took a crop of the leaves (as whole pic is quite big at about 8MB).
3. Lighting issue. Background is more lighted than the subject (which was true as it was bright sunny outside but the pot was in shade). Any pointers as to how to take pics of such subjects (where there is more light in the background than on the subject)

Will work more on this pot and see if I can get better pics

I tried a macro shot today. The object was the eye of a toy fish. I intentionally kept another fish behind it about 50-60cms.
Camera settings: Macro mode on 12-50 lens, 1/40, f6.3, ISO 800, IS Off

The Official non-auto Image thread-pa260067.jpg


Tried taking picture of a flying helicopter with the 12-50. it was a disaster
joslicx is offline  
Reply

Most Viewed


Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks