Why did the dealer undervalue a new Skoda Rapid? Hello Team-BHPians,
Hope you are all well.
I’m new here and this is my first post. It may be a long one but your answers will really help me, therefore please bear with me and go through my query in detail.
Regarding myself, I’m from Bangalore, a regular reader of the posts, news and reviews on this portal. Wrote to GTO regarding the below query and was advised to get a membership here and ask you guys. So here I am.
Coming to my concern, in 2016 I came across an advertisement in the newspaper regarding Skoda Rapid being available at 0% interest. I called the toll free number and registered as interested and was contacted back by Skoda within 5 minutes. Later that day a sales guy from Tafe Access on St. Marks Road came to my house with a diesel Ambition variant. This was the variant I had requested. He explained the entire process of the financing, the options and the whole gamut. His approach was very methodical and clear and crisp in every way. Apart from this he also offered me freebies like rear parking sensors, leatherette seats etc which were coming up to approximately 45k. I gave him the cheque for 50k immediately as booking amount. That day I was flooded with calls from various people from Tafe thanking me for the booking. I guess I got around 7 or 8 calls from finance guys and showroom manager included. Next day I provided all the documents for finance requirements.
The sales guy came over to my house and collected them. Everything was smooth and crystal clear until I was called to the showroom to sign the loan documents and see the car. The details are as below.
Down payment 50k.
Loan amount 8 lacs for 4 years at 2.xx%.
Remaining cash to be paid 4.5 lacs including registration and insurance etc.
On road price of Skoda Rapid Ambition variant 13 lacs.
As I was about to sign the loan documents I had a gut feel that something was amiss. The math was wrong. I felt I must ask about the breakdown. That’s when things went wrong. I was told that the 8 lacs loan that I was availing was not entirely from VW Finance. Only 7 lacs was from VW Finance and 1 lac would be from Tafe. So the ex showroom price of the vehicle would be undervalued by 1 lac there. Further they were also reducing the price of the freebies that were providing from the ex showroom price of the car. Ex showroom price of the vehicle which was originally 11 lacs was now 9.xx lacs and this was the rate at which they were going to register and insure it at.
My question to them regarding reduction in registration and insurance costs that they were charging me had to then reduce, had no answers. I argued that if the value of the car was 9.xx lacs then insurance and registration with lifetime road tax will also be lesser than a car costing ex showroom 11 lacs. No answers again. Someone said, Sir, it’s market practice. So basically they were taking 13 lacs from me for a car costing 11.xx lacs and pocketing the rest. I refused to sign the loan documents and left the showroom. Hailing from a middle class background this was a special moment for me as it would have been my first car and a good one too but the dishonesty was more than I could handle. I cancelled the booking and asked for a refund of the booking amount. It was returned to me by cash over a period of 3 or 4 months in 3 separate instalments of 20, 20 and 10. I was under the impression that this should have been returned by cheque or demand draft. Anyways I accepted the cash and moved on.
Now, in 2019 I have a young family and need a car and would like to purchase one, preferably a Rapid or Vento because I’m in love with them. Which one would you guys recommend? Also, is it “market practice”? What should I look out for this time around? I understand that my query is long but I would appreciate some help here.
Looking forward to your responses.
Cheers,
BR
Hi Mods,
I searched for similar topics, found many Skoda cheating cases but nothing related to this query. If there is something similar please merge to that thread.
Thanks
Last edited by Aditya : 20th June 2019 at 08:36.
Reason: Paragraph spacing
|