Quote:
Originally Posted by JayPrashanth
We've managed to gathered a bunch of details about the various changes on the facelifted model of the car. - The car will get the new Urban Brown paint job, the same colour seen on the Indigo eCS facelift.
- The front bumper to see a redesign and will look similar to what the facelifted Indigo eCS offers.
- Chrome surrounds for the fog lamps
- Grille gets a dollop of chrome (current eV2 grille has a grey finish)
- Hatch lid will get a chrome strip somewhat similar to the chrome detailing on the Indigo Marina, but wider
- New alloy wheel design for the top end variant
- Beige colour scheme on the dashboard
- Silver accents will replace wood finish on the center console
- 1.4 Liter CR4 turbo diesel engine might get a slight tweak (Not confirmed)
The Indica eV2 will continue to play the role of a diesel price warrior and will continue with the 1.4 liter CR4 turbo diesel engine as its mainstay. The engine, good for 70 Bhp-140 Nm, is mated to a 5 speed manual gearbox. The Indica eV2 comes with a high ARAI fuel efficiency rating of 25 Kmpl and this mileage figure will continue to be the major selling point of the car. An end-June launch is what we anticipate for the Indica eV2 facelift. |
The "New" Indica may promise a zillion "new" features and may also promise in excess of 25kmpl ARAI, but as long as two crucial features are missing, the Indica will still INDICA-te a lost cause. The two crucial features, QUALITY and RELIABILITY, are, in my opinion, severely lacking in the Indica eV2.
I have read numerous posts by aggrieved customers complaining about lack of quality and reliability of their Tata cars on this forum. I have also seen so many Indicas making all the wrong/worrying sounds (squeeks, vibrations, etc.), that I would want to stay away from a Tata EV2, even if I were to be offered one for free. Heck, the pain/cost of sending the car to the garage for frequent repairs could far outweigh the joys of owning one of these 'white elephants' on wheels.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deep Blue I find it funny that they need to camouflage this car for testing! It is been around for so long that I dont think people would give it a second look.
What are they testing for? |
Forget about the mechanical tests, Tata could well be conducting a "psychological" test on the EV2!
For all you know, they could be conducting a test to evaluate if...
* People are actually looking/drawn towards a Tata test car because/in spite of its stickers with lines scribbled all over them?
* If so, how many of them, in what age/sex/economic group, and why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayPrashanth From the looks of it, lots of fellow BHPians don't seem to be very happy about this facelift from Tata Motors but the trouble is there's only this much the engineers at Tata Motors can do in the limited time they have, to come up with something to satisfy the senior management. |
The fact that this "face-lift" does not appeal to fellow BHPians, but was (or should have been) approved by Tata Chairman Cyrus Mistry is, indeed, well...ummm a 'mystery' to me. Just what did he see in the product that looks nothing new from the earlier edition, that he or his juniors even endorced/sanctioned the "test" car/s in the first place?
Quote:
Originally Posted by VeluM The source should be fired by Tata.
These vendors should have been replaced a while ago. |
On the contrary, the source is only reflecting the attitude of the company right from the very top. How is it that a "refurbished" car is being allowed to be marketed and sold in a country which is marked by cut-throat competition? Damn, by now, even cabbies will have aspirations and they may not want to be seen in an EV2 in the near future!
In my opinion, it is the company that should clearly specify what type of parts they want and how (good) they want them, before scouting out for vendors. If Tata doesnt mind bumpers that lose their shine within a few months as long as they can save costs, they will find vendors headquartered in scrap yards. But, if Tata is willing to spend on quality parts, they will surely find vendors who will not compromise on quality.
In my opinion, Tata should first give itself a "facelift" to rebuild the (
T)rust of its (
A)udience by changing its (
T)hought and (
A)ttidude.
1. Given the many complaints (quality and reliability) surrounding most of its vehicles, Tata is rapidly losing the TRUST of its customers. How many people today can confidently walk into a Tata showroom and state that they fully TRUST Tata cars?
2. Tata also needs to re-evaluate its target AUDIENCE to find out WHO exactly wants to buy a Tata car? And more importantly, WHY do they want to buy them, especially when there are so many other options available to them.
For the above two to happen, Tata needs to seriously revamp its THOUGHT process and ATTITUDE towards the sale of its cars. People now have the means to buy more/better cars than before (more people bought a DZire than an Alto last month) and if Tata continues with its "cut-corners-to-cut-losses" thought process, what will be the attitude of the company and dealers towards the customers?
My wife and I have had a dismal experience whenever we have visited a Tata showroom here in Goa and I am not one bit surprised to see a number of dusty Nano cars lined up outside the Tata showroom at Verna before June. And with the monsoons having set in, I will not be surprised if corrosion also sets in on these seemingly forlorn Nano cars that almost appear to be pleading "please-take-me".
But these are my observations and satisfied Tata customers will surely think otherwise.