Re: Mahindra's new design concept, the XUV Aero Quote:
Originally Posted by Latheesh Hope they did not forget the meaning of word "AERO" when designing the vehicle. |
LOL. That was my first reaction. I was almost going to tweet the definition of the word 'aero' to Anand Mahindra. Quote:
Originally Posted by needforspeed88 I mean what is it with Mahindra and overdone styling. The KUV and now the XUV Aero.. so many lines, a mishmash of shapes and very poorly proportioned. No disrespect to Mahindra but this will fit in to the weird and wacky thread without much difficulty. The vehicle looks like it is on a marriage procession with all the lights up front. Awful is the word i choose both in design and execution. |
You're right. I can't think of any other manufacturer present in India today that has such a consistently ugly range of vehicles. You can't count the Thar, because it's basically a Jeep design that hasn't changed in 75 years, the XUV just about gets away without being called ugly, but the rest of them - MY GOD. The Xylo looks like someone put wheels on a toaster-oven, the TUV looks like it's designer had a ruler-fetish, and I can't think of an uglier vehicle than the KUV100. Every time I see on of their hoardings for the KUV100 that says "born with good looking SUV genes" I burst out laughing uncontrollably. Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbanator This is what happens when you are trying to produce something by copying - every panel of this concept or whatever has been inspired by something else ( including Mahindra's own products ), this is downright ugly from any angle you see in my opinion, have seen enough of such cars in China where they copy far better......
Sorry but most of the guys who want this to be produced will come out with 100 different excuses for not buying if at all it goes for production. |
Spot on. Firstly, these Coupe-style SUVs are the MOST hideous segment of cars in existence. I have a friend who's an automotive designer in the US for Subaru, and he says that all designers LOATHE these Coupe SUVs, but they have to do them because they're money-rakers.
Secondly, they're completely stupid and pointless. Remember the TG review of the X6?? If that doesn't convince you, here's what Keith Edwards, the Product Manager for the GLC line at Merc had to say. “[Buyers are] really drawn to the vehicle, based off of exterior styling and the image of the car. A coupe, at the end of the day, is about showing off… You’re basically working with a high household income and a very trend-setting crowd. They’re certainly in the hands of the right customers in the right places.”
TRANSLATION: This car has less practical value than a sedan or traditional SUV, costs more, rides worse, and has no off-road capability whatsoever. People only buy them out of vanity.
Last edited by ghostrider : 29th June 2017 at 14:16.
|