Team-BHP > The Indian Car Scene
Register New Topics New Posts Top Thanked Team-BHP FAQ


Closed Thread
  Search this Thread
728,573 views
Old 28th March 2007, 12:22   #46
Senior - BHPian
 
supremeBaleno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chennai / Kochi
Posts: 5,546
Thanked: 2,698 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zappo
My Indica has a green tinted glasses. They are factory fitted. So even if I remove those light tints from the glasses it will still be a green hued glass all around.
Are you sure that it is green film pasted on your windows ? I would think it is the glass manufactured with a tint (ie. without using film). Many cars have that and since there is no film involved, you obviously cannot remove it. And since it is factory fitted and does not really block visibility, I dont think it should be a problem.
supremeBaleno is offline  
Old 28th March 2007, 12:31   #47
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 3,717
Thanked: 449 Times

Problem is this rule has some exemptions. The judge that passed this order will cite security concerns and get exemptions from removing tints. If this rule applied to all, including politicians, celebrities and other officials in authority, then no judge would have passed this stupid order.
amit is offline  
Old 28th March 2007, 12:51   #48
Senior - BHPian
 
iraghava's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bhaiyyaland
Posts: 8,033
Thanked: 265 Times

The only fine I'm worried about is the Speeding one, 900 bucks is going to pinch. I don't commit the other offences so no problems for me there. Let's see how sternly this is implemented.

Quote:
Originally Posted by khaadu75 View Post
Look at the bright side guys , the hot babes can't hide behind them dark tints .... everything has a silver lining , u just have to look for it
Khaadu teri biwi paregi to bahut maaregi, sharam kar!!!
iraghava is offline  
Old 28th March 2007, 16:18   #49
BANNED
 
khaadu75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: same as the proposed venue for F1 ;-)
Posts: 1,156
Thanked: 16 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by iraghava View Post
Khaadu teri biwi paregi to bahut maaregi, sharam kar!!!
No way man , that wud happen only if I was to touch ... looking has no issues
khaadu75 is offline  
Old 28th March 2007, 19:59   #50
Senior - BHPian
 
vivekiny2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: cincinnati, jabalpur,chennai
Posts: 1,264
Thanked: 209 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rtech View Post
So it's more dangerous to talk on the mobile phone than it is to drive while drunk? Atleast that's what they imply by that list of fines.
I think it's because rich talk on mobile, while aam aadmi tends to drink more often.

aam aadmi deserves concession.
vivekiny2k is offline  
Old 9th April 2007, 09:54   #51
BHPian
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: delhi
Posts: 125
Thanked: 4 Times

About the bus drivers being 12th pass could somebosy tell me if all police personnel starting from a hawaldar are at least 12th pass.

I understand its good if the drivers are educated but curios to know if Delhi police's house is in order before bringing somebody else's house in order.

Also let me remind all of you that some(don't know how many) years ago there did not use to be a 10+2. I think it was just upto class 11th and then graduation.
compenn is offline  
Old 9th April 2007, 12:08   #52
BHPian
 
rishibravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 579
Thanked: 11 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by compenn View Post
About the bus drivers being 12th pass could somebosy tell me if all police personnel starting from a hawaldar are at least 12th pass.

I understand its good if the drivers are educated but curios to know if Delhi police's house is in order before bringing somebody else's house in order.

Also let me remind all of you that some(don't know how many) years ago there did not use to be a 10+2. I think it was just upto class 11th and then graduation.
I totally agree with you. I dont think a 12th pass guy would want to be a driver of a blue line bus. This new law is totally against the aam janta ( by aam i mean the real aam janta not the middle class and upper middle class)
rishibravo is offline  
Old 9th April 2007, 12:34   #53
Senior - BHPian
 
manveet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 1,094
Thanked: 732 Times

Today's paper carries a half page Advert regarding the Rules that go into effect from today i.e. 9th April.

The Advert mentions 2 links in bold
Upon following the link, you'll realize that it doesn't lead to the specific Article or Order - it's just one further from the Home Page.
And I quote form the website
"Use of dark, black or reflective glasses in vehicles is not permitted as per law. As provided in Rule 100 of Central Motor Vehicle Rules 1989, the glass of windscreen and rear window of motor vehicles should have a visibility of at least 70% and that of side windows a minimum visibility of 50%. The specification of glass should conform to Indian Standards [ IS:2553 - Part 2 - 1992 ]. The front windscreen shall be of laminated safety glass, whose pieces do not fly in the event of a crash and edges would be less jagged than in case of ordinary glass."

Frankly, this just validates my apprehension about Tabloids like the TOI.

So, question arises - are articles just being written to scare the public or is there any substance in it?

Because, if I recollect correctly - None of the official Traffic Police Adverts conclusively mention anything to the effect that indicates that even 70% visibility sun-film is not allowed.

Perhaps someone can provide a scanned image of todays newspaper advert to clarify, I may be wrong.

Last edited by manveet : 9th April 2007 at 12:42.
manveet is offline  
Old 9th April 2007, 13:16   #54
Senior - BHPian
 
DCEite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NCR
Posts: 3,417
Thanked: 2,551 Times

Now i am all the more confused. Just removed my sun film today in the morning. Got late to office by 1 hour because of that. And i dont even live in Delhi. (Gurgaon).
And now i see this (post 54).
DCEite is offline  
Old 9th April 2007, 13:18   #55
Team-BHP Support
 
tsk1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 23,717
Thanked: 22,825 Times

dceite, all tints have been banned. Reason "Equipment to check % is expensive".
Same dumb logic was given when this was done in chandigarh.
tsk1979 is offline  
Old 9th April 2007, 13:27   #56
BHPian
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 107
Thanked: 5 Times

So this mean that even in the case where there is 70% visibility & 50% visibility in rear & the side windows in the vehicle,one is likely to be challened?? I haven't removed the tint in my cars so far..Guess will wait & watch..

Can this order be challenged??
AshOnTheRocks is offline  
Old 9th April 2007, 13:29   #57
BHPian
 
rishibravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 579
Thanked: 11 Times

Heres are some pics of the Ad.





rishibravo is offline  
Old 9th April 2007, 13:30   #58
BHPian
 
rishibravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 579
Thanked: 11 Times

this is the link for the high court judgement. The link is given at the bottom of the Advertisement

Last edited by rishibravo : 9th April 2007 at 13:33.
rishibravo is offline  
Old 9th April 2007, 13:35   #59
Senior - BHPian
 
DCEite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NCR
Posts: 3,417
Thanked: 2,551 Times

Advt says order applicable to all vehicles plying in Delhi.

Does that mean this rule is not applicable in Gurgaon/Noida/Fbad ?
DCEite is offline  
Old 9th April 2007, 13:38   #60
Team-BHP Support
 
tsk1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 23,717
Thanked: 22,825 Times

Of course not, but if you go to delhi, you will be challaned due to tints.
tsk1979 is offline  
Closed Thread

Most Viewed


Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks