Hyundai's 'public car' to take on Tata Nano

ashutoshb · 31st January 2008, 05:40

look at the brighter side. now, the decision makers will be forced to do (much more than ever before) something about the roads!!

kryptik83 · 31st January 2008, 11:13

If I was a major in the industry and you try to push down my sales figures by introducing an inexpensive little prick on the road, even I would not have let you go. I only hope the output of this healthy little competition that is raising its hood in the Indian automobile industry ends with the customer bearing the fruits of all the efforts that these majors in their domains put in.

vivekiny2k · 1st February 2008, 00:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by BUSA

Companies are making cheap(price wise) cars, but the government has other plans. Not everyone will be able to buy the Nano, Read this

Quote:

Posted by BUSA at 1:19 AM

promoting your own blog (and your opinion, without any suporting facts)?

you could have copied the same 7 lines here on the forum. no copyright violation either.

viper316 · 1st February 2008, 01:45

Hi,

It would take the Bajaj , Renault , Hyundai and others 3 to 4 years of R & D to catch the NANO . By then i would have created a market share which would be tuff to beat

Mayavi · 1st February 2008, 01:55

Lol, its funny read T-BHP members opposing new cheap cars citing insufficient infrastructure. How many of you gave a thought to it before buying your car? How many of you expressed concern when analysts predicted car sales of 1 million a year by 2010? It seems people are only concerned when the price is 1 lakh. A 2 lakh maruti 800 didn't worry anyone!

1100D · 1st February 2008, 04:53

I think Mr Tata asked us to think beyond, we are still talking Nano. Instead we should think in terms of a 2 lakh rear wheel drive sedan with fuel efficiency to match the 800 and performance to match the skyline.

motorheadinc · 1st February 2008, 12:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1100D

I think Mr Tata asked us to think beyond, we are still talking Nano. Instead we should think in terms of a 2 lakh rear wheel drive sedan with fuel efficiency to match the 800 and performance to match the skyline.

Liked that one

Then Tata would be the only surviving automaker not only in India but also in the world. LOLzzzzz

ankit.jhamb · 1st February 2008, 15:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1100D

I think Mr Tata asked us to think beyond, we are still talking Nano. Instead we should think in terms of a 2 lakh rear wheel drive sedan with fuel efficiency to match the 800 and performance to match the skyline.

and to add ::a 3 lakh TATA safari (with rear engine)

Car-Agey · 1st February 2008, 15:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by ankit.jhamb

and to add ::a 3 lakh TATA safari (with rear engine)

Then may be a 4 lac rear engine Jaguar

and a 5 lac rear engine Land Rovercheers:

rohitv122 · 17th July 2009, 22:41

The Indian arena will be in a state where in you throw a stone up in the air, it would either fall on a Nano or a Pulsar.
By the time hyundai comes up with the car, we will have millions of Nano's going around like germs, Everybody will be fed up of Cars...

loving_alaap · 17th July 2009, 23:02

does anybody have photos of the car?

discoverwild · 17th July 2009, 23:19

This thread is over a year and a half old and deserves to be locked as there is no information if Hyundai is in fact bringing in a small car.

31st January 2008, 05:40	#31
ashutoshb Senior - BHPian Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: NOIDA Posts: 1,756 Thanked: 4,288 Times View My Garage	look at the brighter side. now, the decision makers will be forced to do (much more than ever before) something about the roads!!
	() Thanks

31st January 2008, 11:13	#32
kryptik83 BHPian Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Calcutta Posts: 34 Thanked: 0 Times	If I was a major in the industry and you try to push down my sales figures by introducing an inexpensive little prick on the road, even I would not have let you go. I only hope the output of this healthy little competition that is raising its hood in the Indian automobile industry ends with the customer bearing the fruits of all the efforts that these majors in their domains put in.
	() Thanks

1st February 2008, 01:45	#34
viper316 BHPian Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: BeNgAlUrU/PoNdY Posts: 61 Thanked: 2 Times	Hi, It would take the Bajaj , Renault , Hyundai and others 3 to 4 years of R & D to catch the NANO . By then i would have created a market share which would be tuff to beat
	() Thanks

1st February 2008, 01:55	#35
Mayavi BHPian Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Scottsdale Posts: 682 Thanked: 9 Times View My Garage	Lol, its funny read T-BHP members opposing new cheap cars citing insufficient infrastructure. How many of you gave a thought to it before buying your car? How many of you expressed concern when analysts predicted car sales of 1 million a year by 2010? It seems people are only concerned when the price is 1 lakh. A 2 lakh maruti 800 didn't worry anyone!
	() Thanks

1st February 2008, 04:53	#36
1100D Senior - BHPian Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Calcutta Posts: 4,390 Thanked: 4,096 Times View My Garage	I think Mr Tata asked us to think beyond, we are still talking Nano. Instead we should think in terms of a 2 lakh rear wheel drive sedan with fuel efficiency to match the 800 and performance to match the skyline.
	() Thanks

17th July 2009, 22:41	#40
rohitv122 BHPian Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: bangalore Posts: 22 Thanked: 0 Times	The Indian arena will be in a state where in you throw a stone up in the air, it would either fall on a Nano or a Pulsar. By the time hyundai comes up with the car, we will have millions of Nano's going around like germs, Everybody will be fed up of Cars...
	() Thanks

17th July 2009, 23:02	#41
loving_alaap BHPian Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Ahmedabad Posts: 808 Thanked: 9 Times	does anybody have photos of the car?
	() Thanks

17th July 2009, 23:19	#42
discoverwild Senior - BHPian Join Date: May 2009 Location: BLR/CBE Posts: 1,296 Thanked: 3,650 Times	This thread is over a year and a half old and deserves to be locked as there is no information if Hyundai is in fact bringing in a small car.
	() Thanks