Team-BHP > The Indian Car Scene
Register New Topics New Posts Top Thanked Team-BHP FAQ


Reply
  Search this Thread
28,147 views
Old 12th February 2008, 11:24   #1
Senior - BHPian
 
ram_hyundai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calicut ,trisur
Posts: 2,020
Thanked: 53 Times
the truth about-swift ddis,palio mjd-engines

mods please shift this thread to appropriate section.
there is a popular belief running arround the automotive circles that fiat is supplying engines to msil for the swift diesels.
the truth is -gm,fiat,and msil have obtained rights from bosch to manufacture and sell the engine in question.
swift ddis engine is never a fiat engine
fiat mjd engine wont be manufactured by msil
gm in all its capacity would be making them on their own
there would be capacity hike and small changes regarding this platform for different manufacturers

ram
ram_hyundai is offline  
Old 12th February 2008, 11:27   #2
Senior - BHPian
 
srishiva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bengaluru
Posts: 4,375
Thanked: 2,256 Times

Well Bosch or Delphi manufacture the common rail, pumps for all such engines. Don't the car manufacturers have their own design inputs and custom solutions for engines ?
srishiva is offline  
Old 12th February 2008, 11:29   #3
BHPian
 
gkrishn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 626
Thanked: 93 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by ram_hyundai View Post
there is a popular belief running arround the automotive circles that fiat is supplying engines to msil for the swift diesels.
The popular belief was, fiat designed this engine...
gkrishn is offline  
Old 12th February 2008, 11:34   #4
Senior - BHPian
 
greenhorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: KL-01
Posts: 7,745
Thanked: 4,397 Times

wonder if tata will be making them on their own as well, since they are pretty cozy with fiat these days
greenhorn is offline  
Old 12th February 2008, 11:35   #5
BHPian
 
mahadev_kc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bengaluru
Posts: 328
Thanked: 48 Times

Multijet was designed along with Bosch, GM-FIAT alliance. Suzuki were never involved in the design. Since, GM had around 19% shares of Suzuki, that's how the Suzuki got the license for Multijet engine.
mahadev_kc is offline  
Old 12th February 2008, 11:57   #6
Senior - BHPian
 
gemithomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Trivandrum
Posts: 2,366
Thanked: 143 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by mahadev_kc View Post
Multijet was designed along with Bosch, GM-FIAT alliance. Suzuki were never involved in the design. Since, GM had around 19% shares of Suzuki, that's how the Suzuki got the license for Multijet engine.
Yes. Thats what i also have heard.
gemithomas is offline  
Old 12th February 2008, 12:00   #7
Senior - BHPian
 
snaronikar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bengaluru
Posts: 2,845
Thanked: 29 Times

Whatever said and done, ultimately, the customers are getting the benefit of the technology. Thanks to them.
snaronikar is offline  
Old 12th February 2008, 12:30   #8
BHPian
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Jose USA, Panaji, Goa
Posts: 89
Thanked: 341 Times

There are a couple of things to note:
1) Indirect injection of fuel
2) Direct injection of fuel
3) Direct, multiple injection

#1 is the old, conventional diesel technology that was very common on cars.
#2 is also old, but it was mainly found in trucks, buses, generators etc. It is more efficient than #1, but suffers from greater levels of noise and less refinement. That is why #1 though less efficient, found fancy in cars.

It was Fiat that first drove the development of # 3 -Direct multiple Injection technology, with Bosch playing the role of supplier. There are several key pieces of this technology, the main ones being the multi-injection sequence of the fuel, with the other being the high pressure delivery of the fuel via a common-rail or pump-duse (VW tech). The multi-injection aspect of it was one of the keys for the greater refinement now observed in the new diesels. This aspect was pioneered by Fiat.

Since this pioneering development in the late 80s and early 90s, the technology challenge has now moved on towards increasing the delivery pressure. Here, the suppliers such as Bosch and Delphi have taken leading roles. Increasing delivery pressure in conjunction with turbo charging and intercooling (for denser O2 supply) allows for more efficient burning of the fuel (the burn center occurs deeper in the center of the cylinder as a result of the higher push pressure) which leads to more power and reduced emissions. The current state of the art is 2000 psi, for which the German autos like VW/Audi and perhaps BMW and Mercedes also have with Bosch. I suspect the Fiat Diesel use the older 1300 psi injection system. The multi-jet engines being manufactured in India are under licence from Fiat, not Bosch. Bosch is just a supplier of the common-rail component only.
goacom is offline  
Old 12th February 2008, 13:01   #9
BHPian
 
kaustubh_vaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pune
Posts: 224
Thanked: 53 Times

Hey goacom,
Thanks for the explanation. Its a detailed one and if this is the exact truth, hats off to Fiat for coming up with this technology.
Regards,
Kaustubh
kaustubh_vaze is offline  
Old 12th February 2008, 13:07   #10
Senior - BHPian
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Faridabad/Delhi
Posts: 1,704
Thanked: 780 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by ram_hyundai View Post
mods please shift this thread to appropriate section.
there is a popular belief running arround the automotive circles that fiat is supplying engines to msil for the swift diesels.
the truth is -gm,fiat,and msil have obtained rights from bosch to manufacture and sell the engine in question.
swift ddis engine is never a fiat engine
fiat mjd engine wont be manufactured by msil
gm in all its capacity would be making them on their own
there would be capacity hike and small changes regarding this platform for different manufacturers

ram
Your information is only partly correct. True, Fiat isn't supplying engines to MSIL. However, their manufacture by MSIL is under license from Fiat. Check this:

GLOBAL SUZUKI

Also note that MSIL advertises the fact that the engine won "International Engine of the Year Award" in Europe which, as everyone knows, was the Fiat 1.3 engine. Check this:

Maruti Swift - The Technology

Please provide some authoritative source in support of what you say.

Last edited by directinjection : 12th February 2008 at 13:18.
directinjection is offline  
Old 12th February 2008, 13:14   #11
BHPian
 
spindoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Madras
Posts: 356
Thanked: 293 Times

The Fiat Multijet/JTD engines are from Fiat-GM Powertrain (now defunct, except in Poland i think). Both GM and Fiat have shared ownership of the engine. I think Fiat Powertrain still has the liberty to build newer variants for its exclusive use, as mentioned in this press release:
"The engine will be sold to both captive and non-captive customers, with the higher power output reserved to FGA applications."
Source:
http://www.fptpowertrain.com/eng/pdf/Comunicato_uk.pdf
spindoc is offline  
Old 12th February 2008, 13:19   #12
BHPian
 
spindoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Madras
Posts: 356
Thanked: 293 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by directinjection View Post
Your information is only partly correct. True, Fiat isn't supplying engines to MSIL. However, their manufacture by MSIL is under license from Fiat. Check this:

GLOBAL SUZUKI

Please provide some authoritative source in support of what you say.
Not just Fiat... Fiat and GM!
This is mentioned in the web page you have linked to:
Product License Agreement with FIAT AUTO S.p.A (Italy) and Adam Opel AG (Germany) to obtain Technology...
spindoc is offline  
Old 12th February 2008, 13:36   #13
BHPian
 
grvanand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 211
Thanked: 0 Times

AFAIK, GM were never at the development stage, it was wholly Fiat, GM bought a stake in Fiat through which they got hold of the technology. It was very recently that Fiat got back its stake held by GM due to GMs goodwill with which Fiat is still surviving, else it would have been another Daewoo. Have just made a BIG story short.
grvanand is offline  
Old 12th February 2008, 13:50   #14
BHPian
 
jaibir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 317
Thanked: 50 Times

Suzuki was not involved in the development stage. They got it through GM. Suzuki seems to have no internal capabilities on developing diesels. That said, they've done a brilliant job of adapting the Multijets into their global flagship cars (Swift and SX4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by grvanand View Post
AFAIK, GM were never at the development stage, it was wholly Fiat, GM bought a stake in Fiat through which they got hold of the technology. It was very recently that Fiat got back its stake held by GM due to GMs goodwill with which Fiat is still surviving, else it would have been another Daewoo.
OT
As far as I remember, GM was desparate to get out and had to pay Fiat to be allowed to leave. Fiat has a five year option to sell themselved to GM. GM paid $2 billion to be allowed to exit that agreement. They realised they lose enough money on their own without adding Fiat's losses to their woes

Last edited by jaibir : 12th February 2008 at 13:52.
jaibir is offline  
Old 12th February 2008, 13:51   #15
Senior - BHPian
 
srishiva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bengaluru
Posts: 4,375
Thanked: 2,256 Times

Whatever one thinks about Fiat, credit should be given where its due. The technology was developed by Fiat Research. It doesn't matter who owns the technology in whatever way.
srishiva is offline   (1) Thanks
Reply

Most Viewed


Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks