Quote:
Originally Posted by R17 Im gonna refute a few points since Im a true German car enthusiast and Im in a forum of auto enthusiasts:-
1) Yea, Im pretty sure Im not getting the point here - The Tiguan is a "crossover SUV". So is the CRV. And the Tucson, the Captiva, even the BMW X3 for that matter. So the Tig is as much of a genuine SUV as most of the other solutions offered in this class in India - or anywhere in the world.
2) Youre affirming my point by highlighting the fact that the Fortuner is based on the Innova's IMV platform. Its ok for a 10 Lakh MUV developed for India, Thailand and rest of the 3rd world countries but with all due respect, it doesnt hold a candle to the A5 platform.
3) Btw, the Hyundai i10, the Hyundai Getz, the Suzuki Ritz have all scored 4 stars. Meanwhile, even the Punto and the i20 have scored 5 stars. On the other hand, Id like to know of any other vehicle in India (including all the Mercs, Volvos, BMWs etc) which has aced all the 3 crash tests including the roof crush test.
4) Engineering integrity doesnt start and end with reliability. By that definition, the Maruti 800 has perhaps the highest engineering integrity in the world. Developing the most innovative safety products, the sweetest handling cars, the soundest structural solutions are some of the USPs that 'German Engineering' provides.
5) Also, if the German cars were either lacking in engg, or unsuitable or untested for Indian roads, the Mercs, BMWs, Audis etc wouldnt be the gods of our world's automotive landscape. And while on the subject of reliability, I cant recollect any protracted session of complaints about the Jetta or the Passat drinking excess oil, every brand draws poor experiences from a small set of owners - not that I think 'drinking engine oil' is a sin big enough to label these cars chronically unreliable. |
1) And here is where the fortuner is better. Thanks to its design, it can do offroading. So in front of Fortuner ( and even GV ), Tiguan is not a genuine SUV. In the face of cars like Captiva and CR-V, Tiguan holds head high as they are also softroaders and not true SUV. But fortuner is thanks to its design and overall proportions.
2) Depends on application. IIRC, some Fortuer crew cabs are sold as hilux in developed markets. So overall, I think that as an SUV that can handle offroading better, A5 is not as good as IMV which was specifically developed to handle rough roads,etc. But for on road dynamics, obviously Tiguan, Crv, Outlander are better. Tiguan is less than 1700mm in height, where as Fortuer is above 1800mm ( high set car as its SUV ) so its obvious that when the products were developed, different criteria were set for both of these vehicles.
3) My point here was that Tiguan does not hold a significant advantage here as competition has come up in standards.
4) But it does include reliability, right ? In my book atleast, reliability is included in engineering. Any car has to be engineered such that it is reliable. I know that the aspect of safety is quite important too along with various ( a huge number ) of parameters. But reliability cannot be ignored at any cost in engineering of any car. As far as handling goes, althought Europeans are ahead, the margin again is not very high.
The safety aspect again, the Japs have caught up. As far as handling goes, they are coming up too. CRV ( and upto a lesser extent the Outlander ) has good good handling. In case of small cars and sedans, Swift, SX4, Civic, Lancer Cedia, Fiesta ( US car maker! ) have good handling.
5) I have read in TBHP itself about these car makers facing one or the other issue with their products. And on the net too, I have read about the same. And the oil drinking habits were there on ACI ( AutoCar India ) itself. There is a thread about Passat's DSG giving trouble. Superb has similar issue IIRC.
Moreover, for Russian quereis reveiced by Skoda, they did admit there is some problem, but for India, Skoda group just bluntly replied that its an issue between Skoda India and the customer.
In short, my points are :
1) The advantage regarding engineering is not very high for VW.
2) Reliability has to be a part of their products which includes Skoda products too. Fabia, Supberb, Passat are examples of what I am trying to say.
3) The attitude of VW. They are not very high above average car makers. They are trying to prove to Indians that they are the best car makers in the world, like premium car makers. In reality they are not the best car makers IMHO.
4) Failure to sort out current issue. Skoda is part of VW and ensuring good A.S & S. is responsibility of car maker. VW has conveniently escaped from this.