[Latheesh]

Sidindica - Its already 23 Dec, few days left for the real show. Time for some teasers.. please

[Sudan_NFS]

Sid please atleast post some pics for us

Here is the pics taken from ACI website in an article for Indicruze



This looks very much similar to production model and suits very well with spy pics which we got.Look at the head lights and late lights which is not like concept one.

Edit:I am sorry,I didn't noticed the pic posted in previous page

[canonball]

Must say the above pic similar to display cars at past autoshows is very much like the cars seen testing, Tata's have decided to keep the show version as is whilst going to market. The headlights, grill, and door mirrors are identical to the last pic posted by tushky

[sachinayak]

Originally Posted by grules

Am I the only one here who hates how the 3rd row window's shape.
Are they trying to copy the CRV's design? I didn't like it in the CRV either.

Attachment 249873

+1
See no value in such a design. Did the M&M front grille designer join TM ???

[indian21r]

By the way both the pics do not match. The last window shows that they are different designs. So this might be Autocar's view

[akhilesh51]

Some irregularities in the pic:

1. No ORVM mounted indicators - Even Grande and Safari have these. Tata would not leave them out of their flagship model.

2. 3rd quarter design is not same in both pics.

3. Grille seems to be excessively flared.

4. Rear design is iffy. Rear lights look like larger version of Nano.


Sid, can you at least confirm or deny the shortfalls in pic.

[enthu]

Indicruze might be priced at USD 25,600-27800 as per the report Luxurious Tata Indicruz Crossover To Debut in India
The site contains the same photos which are already circulated in this forum. Hope to see in actuals.

[shortbread]

I like the way the rear glass line tapers down and cuts off the tail lights. it looks different and classy, gives the Indicruz its own identity from the rear profile. I thought they must've stuck to the regular tower lights like rest of their cars. The front end is typical new gen Tata, but perhaps they could work on that huge grill.

[basilmabraham]

The grill looks too wide, like an open mouth. I feel that the whole vehicle does not fit together, for some reason.

[sidindica]

Those CGI renderings are hideous.The actual thing is very contemporary.

[Latheesh]

Thanks Sid for clearing the doubt. Any plans for some teasers?

[Trapezio]

Originally Posted by sidindica

Those CGI renderings are hideous.The actual thing is very contemporary.

You did a great service to this vehicle.

Otherwise it would have got buried before it was born!

[Latheesh]

Originally Posted by Trapezio

You did a great service to this vehicle.

Otherwise it would have got buried before it was born!

Still it looks 100 times better than the Xylo

[akhilesh51]

Originally Posted by akhilesh51

Some irregularities in the pic:

1. No ORVM mounted indicators - Even Grande and Safari have these. Tata would not leave them out of their flagship model.

2. 3rd quarter design is not same in both pics.

3. Grille seems to be excessively flared.

4. Rear design is iffy. Rear lights look like larger version of Nano.


Sid, can you at least confirm or deny the shortfalls in pic.

Originally Posted by sidindica

Those CGI renderings are hideous.The actual thing is very contemporary.

Thanks Sid ! or else we would have had another 20 pages discussing how TATA designers had dozed off and all only to find that the actual thing is very different...Now only if we could have had a rendering from your side...sigh!

[vinaydas]

lol i felt the cgi guy has given the car some consideration and made it look decent.
imo the test mules looked hideous compared the CGI
hope im wrong