Team-BHP > The Indian Car Scene
Register New Topics New Posts Top Thanked Team-BHP FAQ


View Poll Results: Should we have mandatory fuel efficiency standards? Post a Poll
Yes 8 53.33%
No 7 46.67%
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
1,670 views
Old 12th November 2010, 20:54   #1
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: miami. fl
Posts: 452
Thanked: 205 Times
Should we have mandatory fuel efficiency standards?

Should we have mandatory fuel efficiency standards in india?

For me the answer is yes. I would even go forward and say we should have additional tax on least efficient vehicles in india.

Why?
1. Pollution levels in india are among the wrost.
2. Fuel is finite resource.
3. Lion's share of our imports are fuel related.

I am sure I can come with more but I will leave it there.

Why did I open this thread. Read Mr. Ramesh's statement. His original message of having mandatory fuel efficiency standards is lost and everyone starts debating about BWM's and Audi's part. So unfortunate.

Link for that thread:

http://www.team-bhp.com/forum/indian...am-ramesh.html
airbender is offline  
Old 13th November 2010, 00:49   #2
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: miami. fl
Posts: 452
Thanked: 205 Times

Anyone voting please post proper reasoning for voting for that option.
airbender is offline  
Old 13th November 2010, 00:58   #3
Senior - BHPian
 
AbhiJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kolkata
Posts: 1,476
Thanked: 1,207 Times

I voted No.

Why?

Cars are more than just a medium to get to A to B.

Cars are a passion for a lot of people, including me.

A mandatory F. E. standard will mean one will never be able to buy any Ferrari/Lamborgini in India. Although I doubt I ll be able of afford those cars in this lifetime, I would sure like to have the option of buying them ...

Its a free country. Banning non F.E. cars is wrong. However, one can make a minimum F.E. Standard and increase taxes to 2x for all cars not meeting the same.
AbhiJ is online now  
Old 13th November 2010, 01:07   #4
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: miami. fl
Posts: 452
Thanked: 205 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by AbhiJ View Post
However, one can make a minimum F.E. Standard and increase taxes to 2x for all cars not meeting the same.
That would be a good start. BTW, a good car doesnot mean lousy economy.
airbender is offline  
Old 13th November 2010, 01:14   #5
Senior - BHPian
 
AbhiJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kolkata
Posts: 1,476
Thanked: 1,207 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by airbender View Post
That would be a good start. BTW, a good car doesnot mean lousy economy.
Agreed.

But I doubt most V8's / V12's will pass the F.E. bar...
AbhiJ is online now  
Old 13th November 2010, 01:28   #6
BHPian
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: miami. fl
Posts: 452
Thanked: 205 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by AbhiJ View Post
Agreed.

But I doubt most V8's / V12's will pass the F.E. bar...
US passed the fuel efficiency standards bill and you already see the impact in the form of newer vehicles. Auto makers did not phase them out but cameup with better engines. Old V'8 are now better V6's.
airbender is offline  
Old 13th November 2010, 19:49   #7
Distinguished - BHPian
 
Dr.AD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bangalore/Pune
Posts: 1,803
Thanked: 18,627 Times

I voted No. Although I do appreciate the need to save fuel and environment, I am against most 'mandatory' things. As someone said, it is a free country. We can't go about solving our problems by making everything mandatory.

Quote:
Originally Posted by airbender View Post
Why?
1. Pollution levels in india are among the wrost.
2. Fuel is finite resource.
3. Lion's share of our imports are fuel related.
Regarding point 1, less fuel efficiency does not necessarily mean more pollution. Hence to take care of pollution, there must be direct norms for pollution (which we already have), and there is no need to link that to fuel efficiency.

Regarding point 2, yes it is true. But then why a special case for fuel? We have many other resources which are finite, and there are no mandatory standards on consumption levels in all cases.

I think a better way out is to keep higher taxes on vehicles with lower fuel efficiency. For example, the current tax cuts for smaller than 1.2L petrol and 1.5L diesel engines can be given to vehicles with higher than a certain level of fuel efficiency (what is the logic behind linking taxes to engine size anyway?)

In summary, I appreciate the spirit and it is fine to campaign (and even have tax and other incentives) in favour of fuel efficient vehicles, but let us keep out the "mandatory" word.
Dr.AD is offline  
Reply

Most Viewed


Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks