Ok. Let me try and answer some of Mr. v1p3r's queries in as simple a form as possible.
Quote:
What was the b-Zen doing in the 1600 class? Next the Dolphin with the Esteem engine is going to do 14 secs or less, and there is no way in hell an Esteem can match that in India.
|
Quote:
Ah, so then why was there a separate Zen 1400 class? And then why hasn't anyone else taken the same route? On the other hand, why is Rtech saying rules evolve, and hindsight is 20:20? Is this some sort of admission that there was a loophole?
|
I already answered this in post #8. The current regs were blurry on that, so someone played that to his advantage. Thats motorsport for you. It happens at all levels. Take F1 as its the most well known here. When Schumi won a race in the pits, rules were altered. When BAR had a seperate gas tank within a gas tank, rules were altered. When Michelin had a different definition of how the grooves on the tyres are to be measured, the rules were altered.
Why is it that only in India do we like to have a conspiracy behind everything?
"Admission that there was a loophole". Geez, grow up guys. Yes, there was a grey area in the regs, just as there will be many more in the future which keen drivers will pick up on. There is no such thing as the perfect set of regulations.
THERE IS NO CONSPIRACY HERE!!! Sorry to disappoint
Quote:
So who is running the rules, MAI or ACI? Next time Pantaloons sponsors Burnout, do they get to create their own classes?
|
Quote:
I'm sorry for sounding a little antagonistic, but it seems that a very twisted view of the sport is emerging from the controlling body, MAI (or is it ACI?).
|
Not sure how creating a seperate class for Ezen's is such a big issue? Or is it just that you must argue for the sake of arguing. Ezen class has been around since the inception of the speedrun. A lot of people have gone ahead and plonked in Esteem engines in their zens. To suddenly take away that class would have left those guys out in the cold. However, before you say "why don't you run a Bzen class then as well", let me just say that there is no limit to the number of classification you can make and every organiser has the right to run whichever classifications they deem appropriate.
Its very immature on your part to make comments like the ones you did above an doesn't say much about your understanding of the sport. However, you are pretty much a newbie to the sport, so hopefully you will be willing to understand it from all perspectives and not close your eyes like many others have done.
Quote:
Rtech, 2l8, can you please tell us whose interests you support? Are you a part of the MAI, ACI, FMSCI etc?
|
Why do I need to answer that question here? Why are you so concerned about that? We are just here discussing things and keeping the sport we all love as the prority, so no need to get into personal details.
Quote:
EDIT: Also have to agree with a lot of incredulous faces that there's pretty much no way an NA Indian Lancer can pull off 15.338 after a 1.179 RT. That means he took only 14.6 or 14.7 for the 400m? I have my doubts.
|
Everyone had their doubts. Thats why the cars were scrutineered after the event. In front of all the other teams/tuners. it passed. In motorsport, that is the end of the story, like it or not.
And no, the ET did not include the RT.
At the risk of sounding like a broken record, I repeat:
THERE IS NO CONSPIRACY HERE!!!
You guys are too young to be sitting there and thinking like this. At this rate you will never enjoy the sport and just get more suspicious by the day and end up doubting everyone and everything. I don't know about you, but I can't live like that.
Peace out!