Quote:
Originally Posted by YC.BALENO.CHD PS: My kindest apologies for you, seems that you get hurt and quite emotional when it comes to criticsm for TATA products. As for my car, even if it had 0.25 star rating, it does not have an old age engine (as in Indica), has electricals that may survive those of 5 indicas, does not breakdown, pollutes less and has a far better driving experience than any of the TATA cars.
And it will really be appreciable if you may stop with your worthless comparos. Next you may compare an Indigo with a W124 and then talk about
Indigo being a better deal because it has clear lens headlamps.
So please keep it to swift and vista only. You may go on with your silly statements in some other thread and I may reply appropriately there. |
+ 1 to that.
Greenhorn going on and on about a mediocre car.
Now coming to the ACI figures .
Swift Vista
0-60 5.22 6.35
0-100 13.87 16.36
20-80 11.96 11.79 (beats the swift in 20-80 acceleration by 0.17s)
40-100 14.14 14.87 (has a comparable 40-100 timing,0.73 secs behind)
So,a 0.17s means beating the swift and 0.73s behind means
comparable,now thats what I call TATA marketing although some might call it weak in maths
Exactly your words as mentioned in the previous post.
Top Sp 160 151 (OMG,stops at 151 only,Swift will be ahead)
FE(City) 14.4 13.6 (More FE in city)
FE(Higway) 19.1 16.7 (More FE even on highways)
ABS Option No (Greenhorn,ABS isnt a safety feature I assume)
And lets not forget,Swift although more expensive than the Vista,sells much much more than the Vista.
And Safety features which the TATA have never heard are ABS,EBD,Airbags(nowhere in the Vista,Indica,Indigo etc).Maruti was the 1st mass manufacturer in India to come up with ABS,EBD,Airbags even in small cars.Give credit where due.
So,taking into account all the above things,I feel the Vista is better.I hope Greenhorn would agree to this as well